Bafflevs
Skyflow


Skyflow: Vaults sensitive fields in a separate service rather than encrypting them in place, which changes the architecture more but isolates data better

Transparent proxy that encrypts, tokenises and masks database fields without application code changes
As of 31 August 2026, Baffle's pricing is not published; the vendor quotes on request. Baffle sits in front of databases and data pipelines as a proxy and applies field-level encryption, tokenisation and masking without touching application code. Softwr lists it under Cybersecurity. Baffle is made by Baffle, Inc., available on Linux, Web.
Overview
Baffle protects structured data at field level. It deploys as a transparent proxy between applications and data stores, intercepting traffic and applying encryption, tokenisation, format-preserving de-identification or dynamic masking on the way in and out, with role-based control over who sees real values. It supports customer-held keys, and works across PostgreSQL, MySQL and equivalent managed cloud databases, plus analytics targets including Snowflake, Amazon Redshift, S3 and Kafka streams, and increasingly data flowing into AI pipelines. The distinguishing property is that applications do not change. Most field-level encryption approaches require developers to call an SDK at every read and write, which means finding every code path and re-testing everything. Baffle intercepts at the wire instead, so a legacy application that nobody wants to modify can be brought into scope for encryption in weeks. For organisations facing an audit finding on data at rest in a system they cannot safely refactor, this is often the only realistic option. Buyers are financial services, healthcare and any enterprise carrying regulated fields in databases that predate their current security standard. The trade-off is architectural: you are inserting a component into the production data path, so latency, failover, connection pooling behaviour and support for your exact driver and SQL feature set all have to be proved in your environment rather than assumed. Queries against encrypted columns are also constrained; what operations remain possible depends on the protection mode chosen, and choosing a stronger mode can break reporting that used to work.
The honest half
Concrete and checkable, so you can decide whether any of them matter to you. This is the half of a review a vendor will not write about Baffle.
Cross-shopped
Each pairing was judged by two reviewers asking whether a buyer would genuinely weigh the two against each other. The ones that failed were deleted rather than published.


Skyflow: Vaults sensitive fields in a separate service rather than encrypting them in place, which changes the architecture more but isolates data better


Very Good Security: Aimed at taking payment and sensitive data out of scope at the network edge rather than at the database


HashiCorp Vault: Cheaper and more general if you are willing to have applications call an encryption API rather than run a transparent proxy


Immuta: If the need is policy-based masking for analytics users rather than encryption of data at rest
Pricing
Taken from the vendor's own pricing page. Prices move, so check before you buy.
Baffle Data Protection Services
On request
Capabilities
Transparent proxy deployment
Sits between application and database so no application code changes are required
Field-level encryption
Encrypts individual columns rather than whole volumes, so a stolen backup or a curious DBA sees ciphertext
Tokenisation
Replaces sensitive values with tokens, useful for taking systems out of compliance scope
Format-preserving de-identification
Keeps value shape so downstream systems and validations continue to work
Dynamic data masking
Shows different values to different roles at query time
Bring your own key
Keys held in the customer key management service rather than by the vendor
Analytics and pipeline support
Protection extended to Snowflake, Redshift, S3 and Kafka as well as transactional databases
AI pipeline protection
De-identification of data flowing into model and retrieval workflows
Answered, with sources
Each answer names the page it came from, so you can check it rather than take our word for it.
No. That is the central design choice. Baffle intercepts traffic as a proxy rather than requiring an SDK call at every read and write.
Partly, and it depends on the protection mode. Some modes preserve equality matching and format, stronger modes restrict what SQL operations remain possible, so this must be tested against your actual queries.
Tokenisation can reduce scope by ensuring card data never lands in the protected system, but scope reduction is an assessor judgement, not a product setting.
You do, through your own key management service. Baffle supports bring your own key rather than holding customer keys itself.
Keep looking
Tokenisation proxy that keeps card and personal data out of your own systems and out of PCI scope
Privacy-first VPN with one flat price and no email required to sign up
Long-standing VPN service with a large server network and flexible multi-year plans
Privacy-focused VPN with anonymous account numbers instead of email signup
Consumer VPN with a limited free tier and a bear-themed, beginner-friendly app
Offline-first password manager that stores your vault locally instead of the cloud
Open-source password manager for teams with self-hosted or cloud deployment
Real-time transaction fraud and financial crime detection for banks and payment processors
Unified video, access control and licence plate platform sold in perpetual channel licences plus an annual maintenance contract
Customer identity platform built around passwordless and fraud signals
Privacy management platform with regulatory research and the TRUSTe certification programme
Data security platform that maps effective permissions, content classification and access activity across file shares, Microsoft 365 and SaaS.
Cloud-delivered endpoint protection and EDR, now owned by Broadcom and positioned alongside Symantec.
Softwr does not host reviews and shows no star rating for Baffle, because a rating we did not collect is not ours to publish. What is here is the pricing and platform detail from the vendor’s own pages, limitations we could state concretely, and alternatives a reviewer confirmed people weigh against it. Tell us if any of it is wrong.
What people switch to, and what they give up
Every tier, and where the cost actually lands
Put it head to head with anything we hold
Its rating, and an embed for your own site
Large Chinese video platform that US federal buyers and federal contractors cannot lawfully use
quoteManaged video loss prevention with human auditors for restaurants, convenience stores and retail
quoteWorkforce and customer authentication from a certificate authority
Per user per monthPrivileged access management, endpoint privilege management and secure remote access
quoteCloud video surveillance billed per camera per month, where retention length drives the bill more than anything else
Per camera per monthAI video search that runs on cameras you already own, starting near five dollars per camera per month
Per camera per monthPhishing-resistant passwordless authentication with device trust enforced at every login
quote