Lyra Healthvs
Headspace


Headspace: Headspace is far cheaper per employee where the need is preventative wellbeing rather than clinical therapy

Employer purchased mental health benefit with a curated provider network and measurement based care
As of 1 September 2026, Lyra Health's pricing is not published; the vendor quotes on request. Lyra replaces the traditional employee assistance programme with a network of vetted therapists delivering evidence based therapy, billed to the employer per employee per month. Softwr lists it under Healthcare. Lyra Health is made by Lyra Health, Inc., available on Web, iOS, Android.
Overview
Lyra Health is a workforce mental health benefit bought by employers, not by individuals or health plans. It combines a curated network of therapists and coaches, self guided digital programmes, and higher acuity services for substance use and complex conditions. Its stated differentiator is measurement based care: clinicians are selected and retained on the basis of validated symptom measures rather than availability, and outcomes are tracked with instruments such as PHQ-9 and GAD-7 across an episode. The commercial model is the thing buyers need to understand. Lyra charges the employer a per employee per month fee across the eligible population, and separately the employer funds a contracted number of covered sessions per member per year. Those two numbers are negotiated independently, and the session allowance varies meaningfully between clients. Two companies both saying they have Lyra may be giving employees eight sessions or twenty five. When members exhaust the employer funded allowance, care either transitions to the health plan network, with its deductibles and copayments, or stops. That transition point is the single most consequential detail in the contract and it is not on any public page. Buyers are mid sized and large employers, and the benefit is nearly always positioned against an incumbent employee assistance programme that has poor utilisation. The trade off is that Lyra costs several times what a traditional EAP costs, and the business case rests on utilisation actually rising. An employer that pays a per employee per month fee across the whole workforce and sees single digit utilisation has bought an expensive benefit for a small fraction of staff.
The honest half
Concrete and checkable, so you can decide whether any of them matter to you. This is the half of a review a vendor will not write about Lyra Health.
Cross-shopped
Each pairing was judged by two reviewers asking whether a buyer would genuinely weigh the two against each other. The ones that failed were deleted rather than published.


Headspace: Headspace is far cheaper per employee where the need is preventative wellbeing rather than clinical therapy


Calm: Calm covers sleep and stress at low cost but does not provide clinical care


Ginger: Ginger provides on demand behavioural health coaching with a different acuity profile
Pricing
Taken from the vendor's own pricing page. Prices move, so check before you buy.
Lyra Health
On request
Capabilities
Curated provider network
Therapists and coaches selected for evidence based modalities rather than accepted on network application
Measurement based care
Symptom tracking with validated instruments across an episode, used to manage clinician performance
Self guided digital programmes
Structured cognitive behavioural content for members who do not need or want a therapist
Coaching tier
Lower acuity support delivered by coaches, which absorbs demand that would otherwise consume therapy sessions
Dependant and household coverage
Eligibility typically extends to dependants and household members, which is a large driver of utilisation
Higher acuity pathways
Routes for substance use, eating disorders and complex conditions beyond short term therapy
Employer reporting
Aggregate utilisation and outcome reporting for the benefits team, without individual clinical detail
Global delivery
Provider coverage in multiple countries for multinational employers, with quality and availability varying by market
Answered, with sources
Each answer names the page it came from, so you can check it rather than take our word for it.
Per employee per month across the eligible population, billed to the employer. The rate is quoted, never published, and depends on headcount, dependant eligibility and the contracted session allowance.
It depends entirely on what the employer bought. Session allowances vary widely between clients, so ask your benefits team for the contracted number rather than assuming a standard.
The employer pays the per employee per month fee and funds the covered sessions. After the allowance is exhausted, cost typically shifts to the health plan and the member.
Lyra does not publish one, but it sells primarily to mid sized and large employers and the commercial model does not suit small companies.
Keep looking
Employer and health plan digital mental health, acquired by PsychPlus in June 2026
Twelve week therapist led mental health programme combining an app, a clinician and HRV biofeedback
Guided digital cognitive behavioural therapy with a published randomised trial evidence base
Care navigation and virtual care in one contract for self funded employers and health plans
Healthcare navigation for self insured employers, delivered by pods of human care coordinators
Practice management and EHR for mental health and therapy
Consumer online therapy and psychiatry app billed by subscription or insurance copay
Australian allied health practice management priced per practitioner with usage charges on top
Unified clinical trial data collection and randomisation on one Oracle Life Sciences platform
Patient intake, registration and payments platform for medical practices
Twelve week therapist led mental health programme combining an app, a clinician and HRV biofeedback
Softwr does not host reviews and shows no star rating for Lyra Health, because a rating we did not collect is not ours to publish. What is here is the pricing and platform detail from the vendor’s own pages, limitations we could state concretely, and alternatives a reviewer confirmed people weigh against it. Tell us if any of it is wrong.
What people switch to, and what they give up
Every tier, and where the cost actually lands
Put it head to head with anything we hold
Its rating, and an embed for your own site
Clinical laboratory middleware and informatics from a diagnostics instrument manufacturer
quoteOpen source hospital information system and EMR for low-resource hospitals, built on OpenMRS
Open source, no licence feePeriod and cycle tracking app owned by German company Biowink, positioned around science based tracking and a published stance against sharing data with law enforcement
Free with a Plus subscriptionPeriod and cycle tracking app that settled with the US FTC in 2021 over sharing health data with third parties despite promising not to
Free with a Premium subscriptionOpen source health information platform run from the University of Oslo and used by national ministries
Open source, no licence feeMulti-finding chest X-ray and head CT triage AI with FDA clearance on named findings, not on the whole model
quote