Aidocvs
Lunit
Lunit: Lunit is the stronger option where the priority is mammography and chest radiography screening rather than acute triage
Aidoc
FDA cleared radiology AI for triage and notification of time critical findings
As of 1 September 2026, Aidoc's pricing is not published; the vendor quotes on request. Aidoc runs algorithms over CT and X-ray studies as they arrive and flags suspected time critical findings for prioritised review. Softwr lists it under Healthcare. Aidoc is made by Aidoc Medical, available on Web, iOS, Android.
Overview
What Aidoc does
Aidoc is an Israeli radiology artificial intelligence company selling algorithms that analyse imaging studies at the point they land in the archive and flag suspected findings. Its cleared indications cover intracranial haemorrhage on head CT, pulmonary embolism including incidental pulmonary embolism, large vessel occlusion, cervical spine fracture, pneumothorax on chest X-ray, intra abdominal free gas and brain aneurysm. It also sells the aiOS platform layer, which orchestrates multiple algorithms including third party ones over one integration to the PACS. The regulatory wording is the thing that decides how it can be used. Aidoc clearances are 510(k) clearances for computer aided triage and notification, in the FDA CADt category. That means the software may reorder a worklist and send a notification, and it may not provide a diagnostic interpretation or be relied upon as the primary read. A radiologist must still read every study. Sites that pitch Aidoc internally as a way to reduce reading volume are describing a use the clearance does not permit, and this is the single most common source of failed business cases. Buyers are hospitals and radiology groups, usually funded by a stroke, trauma or cardiovascular service line rather than by radiology itself, because the measurable benefit is time to treatment for the receiving specialty. The trade off is that a triage algorithm tuned for sensitivity produces false positives, and every false positive costs a radiologist an interruption. Sites that do not measure their own positive predictive value in their own population find that clinicians stop trusting the notifications within months.
What people use it for
- A regional stroke centre that wants large vessel occlusion flagged and the neurointervention team notified before the radiologist dictates
- A trauma centre wanting cervical spine fracture and intra abdominal free gas prioritised in an overnight queue read by one on call radiologist
- An oncology imaging programme that wants incidental pulmonary embolism caught on staging CTs ordered for a different question
- A health system that has bought AI from several vendors and wants one PACS integration through aiOS rather than one integration per algorithm
The honest half
Where it falls short
Concrete and checkable, so you can decide whether any of them matter to you. This is the half of a review a vendor will not write about Aidoc.
- The clearances are for triage and notification in the CADt category, so the software may reorder a worklist but may not deliver a diagnosis or replace a read, and business cases built on reduced radiologist workload do not survive contact with the regulatory wording.
- Triage algorithms are tuned for sensitivity, so false positives are routine, and each one interrupts a radiologist. Sites that do not measure positive predictive value in their own case mix see clinician trust erode within months.
- Pricing is per algorithm and per study volume with no published rate card, so the cost of a multi algorithm deployment escalates sharply and cannot be benchmarked before a sales conversation.
- The clinical benefit accrues to stroke, trauma and cardiology service lines while the cost usually lands in the radiology or IT budget, which makes internal funding harder than the return on investment slides suggest.
- Performance depends on scanner protocols and reconstruction settings, so results validated at one site do not transfer, and each deployment needs local validation work that is rarely budgeted for.
Cross-shopped
What people choose instead of Aidoc
Each pairing was judged by two reviewers asking whether a buyer would genuinely weigh the two against each other. The ones that failed were deleted rather than published.
- AidocvsPhilips IntelliSpace PACS
Philips IntelliSpace PACS: If AI adoption is failing because findings are not visible in the reading layout, fixing the PACS workflow may matter more than adding algorithms
Pricing
What Aidoc costs
Taken from the vendor's own pricing page. Prices move, so check before you buy.
Aidoc
On request
- Annual subscription priced by algorithm and by study volume
- aiOS platform integration licensed separately from individual algorithms
- Multi algorithm bundles negotiated for enterprise deployments
- PACS integration and validation quoted as professional services
- No published rate card
Capabilities
Features
Triage and notification
Flags suspected time critical findings and elevates the study in the radiologist worklist with a notification
Intracranial haemorrhage
Cleared algorithm for flagging suspected acute intracranial haemorrhage on non contrast head CT
Pulmonary embolism
Cleared for both suspected and incidental pulmonary embolism on CT, the latter catching findings on scans ordered for another reason
Large vessel occlusion
Flags suspected LVO to support stroke pathway activation
Pneumothorax on X-ray
Cleared algorithm for flagging suspected collapsed lung on chest radiographs
aiOS platform
Single integration layer that runs Aidoc and third party algorithms over one PACS connection
Clinical workflow notifications
Pushes alerts to care teams and mobile devices so the receiving specialty is activated before the formal report
Answered, with sources
Questions people ask
Each answer names the page it came from, so you can check it rather than take our word for it.
Is Aidoc FDA cleared?
Yes, it holds multiple 510(k) clearances, but they are for computer aided triage and notification. It may prioritise a worklist and notify a team. It may not provide a diagnostic interpretation or replace a radiologist read.
Does it reduce radiologist workload?
No. Every study still needs a full read. The benefit is in the order studies are read and how quickly a receiving specialty is activated, not in reading fewer studies.
Can I run other vendors AI through it?
Yes, that is what the aiOS platform layer is for, and for health systems with several AI vendors it is often the main reason to buy Aidoc at all.
Is pricing published?
No. It is quoted per algorithm and by annual study volume, and enterprise bundles are negotiated case by case.
Keep looking
Where to go from Aidoc
- Aidoc alternativesEvery product people weigh against it
- Aidoc pricingPlans, floors and what the tiers exclude
- Aidoc badgesWhich rules it meets, and the figure behind each
- All Healthcare softwareThe full category
- Best Healthcare softwareThe shortlist, and how it was cut
Best Healthcare software for
Compare Aidoc with
- Therapixel
- Lunit
- Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Annalise.ai
- PathAI
- Ambra Health
- Paige
- Figure 1
- UpToDate
- Visage Imaging
- Meru Health
- Sectra
- Cerner PowerWorks
- ChiroTouch
- Doctolib
- Doximity
- eClinicalWorks
- eClinicalWorks Prime
Other Healthcare software
French mammography AI with FDA clearances for 2D and tomosynthesis breast screening
Pricing on request11 researched notesFDA cleared and CE marked AI for mammography, tomosynthesis and chest radiography
Pricing on request11 researched notesEnterprise radiology PACS and diagnostic image viewing from Philips
Pricing on request12 researched notesMulti-finding chest X-ray and head CT triage AI with FDA clearance on named findings, not on the whole model
Pricing on request12 researched notesDigital pathology image management with an FDA cleared platform for primary diagnosis
Pricing on request11 researched notesCloud medical image exchange and vendor neutral archive, now part of Intelerad
Pricing on request12 researched notesDigital pathology AI holding the first FDA De Novo authorisation for a pathology algorithm, now part of Tempus
Pricing on request12 researched notesServer-side streaming PACS built for radiologists reading very large studies over thin connections
Pricing on request12 researched notesTwelve week therapist led mental health programme combining an app, a clinician and HRV biofeedback
Pricing on request12 researched notesEnterprise imaging and PACS from a Swedish vendor that also sells the pathology and cardiology modules on one platform
Pricing on request12 researched notesRevenue cycle management and financial solutions from Cerner
Pricing on request4 researched notesPatient booking and practice management for European healthcare professionals
Pricing on request12 researched notesAI-powered cloud EHR for modern healthcare practices
From $180/mo9 researched notes
Softwr does not host reviews and shows no star rating for Aidoc, because a rating we did not collect is not ours to publish. What is here is the pricing and platform detail from the vendor’s own pages, limitations we could state concretely, and alternatives a reviewer confirmed people weigh against it. Tell us if any of it is wrong.
More on Aidoc
Aidoc alternatives
What people switch to, and what they give up
Aidoc pricing
Every tier, and where the cost actually lands
Compare Aidoc
Put it head to head with anything we hold
Aidoc badge
Its rating, and an embed for your own site
Best Healthcare software alternatives
Clinical laboratory middleware and informatics from a diagnostics instrument manufacturer
quote
Open source hospital information system and EMR for low-resource hospitals, built on OpenMRS
Open source, no licence fee
Period and cycle tracking app owned by German company Biowink, positioned around science based tracking and a published stance against sharing data with law enforcement
Free with a Plus subscription
Period and cycle tracking app that settled with the US FTC in 2021 over sharing health data with third parties despite promising not to
Free with a Premium subscription
Open source health information platform run from the University of Oslo and used by national ministries
Open source, no licence feeMulti-finding chest X-ray and head CT triage AI with FDA clearance on named findings, not on the whole model
quote