Annalise.aivs
Rad AI


Rad AI: If reporting time rather than detection is the bottleneck, and you want to avoid a device validation programme

Multi-finding chest X-ray and head CT triage AI with FDA clearance on named findings, not on the whole model
As of 1 September 2026, Annalise.ai's pricing is not published; the vendor quotes on request. Annalise. Softwr lists it under Healthcare. Annalise.ai is made by Harrison.ai, available on Web, Self-hosted.
Overview
Annalise.ai is the clinical radiology arm of Harrison.ai, an Australian company founded by Aengus Tran and Dimitry Tran. Its two products are Annalise Enterprise CXR, which reports on more than one hundred and twenty findings on chest radiographs, and Annalise Enterprise CTB, which covers around one hundred and thirty findings on non-contrast head CT. The models run against studies as they arrive and push results into the worklist and the reading workflow, with active and passive notification for time critical findings. The distinguishing commercial fact is the regulatory split. In Australia, Europe and the United Kingdom, Annalise carries broad regulatory clearance covering the full multi-finding output as a decision support device. In the United States the position is different: roughly ten findings across chest X-ray and head CT have 510(k) clearance for triage and notification, including pneumothorax, pleural effusion and intracranial haemorrhage, and the device notifies rather than diagnoses. A United States buyer who evaluates the Australian product and then contracts in the United States will find a materially narrower cleared indication. Harrison.ai has also begun marketing the critical care offering under the Harrison.ai name, so the Annalise brand is being folded upward, which is worth clarifying in a multi-year contract. Buyers are hospital emergency and radiology departments, national screening programmes and teleradiology providers. The trade off is that triage AI changes worklist order rather than clinical decisions, and the benefit is only realised if the department actually restructures how urgent studies are picked up. Validation is real but specific: the published work reports improvement in radiologist detection of individual findings under reader study conditions, which is not the same as demonstrating shorter time to treatment in your own emergency department.
The honest half
Concrete and checkable, so you can decide whether any of them matter to you. This is the half of a review a vendor will not write about Annalise.ai.
Cross-shopped
Each pairing was judged by two reviewers asking whether a buyer would genuinely weigh the two against each other. The ones that failed were deleted rather than published.


Rad AI: If reporting time rather than detection is the bottleneck, and you want to avoid a device validation programme


Gleamer: If the priority is musculoskeletal trauma on plain film rather than chest and head


Sectra: If you would rather buy algorithms through an imaging platform marketplace than contract directly with each AI vendor
Pricing
Taken from the vendor's own pricing page. Prices move, so check before you buy.
Annalise Enterprise
On request
Capabilities
Annalise Enterprise CXR
Multi-finding chest radiograph analysis covering over one hundred and twenty findings
Annalise Enterprise CTB
Non-contrast head CT analysis covering around one hundred and thirty findings
Triage and notification
Active and passive alerting for time critical findings such as intracranial haemorrhage
Worklist reprioritisation
Reorders the reading queue rather than requiring a separate application
Localisation overlays
Highlights the region driving each finding on the image
Confidence output
Per finding confidence values rather than a single binary flag
PACS-native deployment
Results surface in the existing viewer and worklist
On-premise or cloud inference
Deployment choice for organisations with data residency constraints
Answered, with sources
Each answer names the page it came from, so you can check it rather than take our word for it.
Around ten across chest X-ray and head CT, for triage and notification only. The model reports far more findings than that; the rest are not cleared in the United States.
Yes. CE marking under the medical device regulation covers a broader decision support indication than the United States triage and notification clearances, so the same software is a different regulatory product depending on where you deploy it.
No. In the United States it is a triage and notification device: it flags studies for earlier review, and the radiologist makes the diagnosis.
The critical care offering is now marketed under the Harrison.ai name. Ask the vendor to name the contracted product explicitly before signing a multi-year deal.
Keep looking
CE marked and FDA cleared imaging AI suite for bone trauma and chest, now owned by RadNet
Generative reporting and follow-up tracking for radiology, positioned outside the diagnostic device boundary
Enterprise imaging and PACS from a Swedish vendor that also sells the pathology and cardiology modules on one platform
FDA cleared radiology AI for triage and notification of time critical findings
Cancer detection AI for breast, prostate and gastric pathology deployed in routine clinical service, not just pilots
Digital pathology AI holding the first FDA De Novo authorisation for a pathology algorithm, now part of Tempus
Enterprise radiology PACS and diagnostic image viewing from Philips
Enterprise imaging platform covering PACS, VNA, cardiology and 3D from Fujifilm Healthcare
Server-side streaming PACS built for radiologists reading very large studies over thin connections
FDA cleared and CE marked AI for mammography, tomosynthesis and chest radiography
AI digital pathology across clinical, veterinary and environmental laboratory disciplines
Digital pathology image management with an FDA cleared platform for primary diagnosis
Supplement dispensing for practitioners, free to use because it earns on the products
Free hospital and health information system from a small NGO, built on the Tryton framework
Practice management for allied health that charges nothing for the software and earns on payments
Softwr does not host reviews and shows no star rating for Annalise.ai, because a rating we did not collect is not ours to publish. What is here is the pricing and platform detail from the vendor’s own pages, limitations we could state concretely, and alternatives a reviewer confirmed people weigh against it. Tell us if any of it is wrong.
What people switch to, and what they give up
Every tier, and where the cost actually lands
Put it head to head with anything we hold
Its rating, and an embed for your own site
Clinical laboratory middleware and informatics from a diagnostics instrument manufacturer
quoteOpen source hospital information system and EMR for low-resource hospitals, built on OpenMRS
Open source, no licence feePeriod and cycle tracking app owned by German company Biowink, positioned around science based tracking and a published stance against sharing data with law enforcement
Free with a Plus subscriptionPeriod and cycle tracking app that settled with the US FTC in 2021 over sharing health data with third parties despite promising not to
Free with a Premium subscriptionOpen source health information platform run from the University of Oslo and used by national ministries
Open source, no licence fee