Softwr

Field Service · head to head

MaintainX vs Zuper

MaintainX logo

MaintainX

Field Service

Mobile-first maintenance and work order management for frontline teams

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Zuper logo

Zuper

Field Service

Field service management with an API-first architecture and heavy integration surface

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Only MaintainX has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • Each has a real cost: MaintainX per-user pricing punishes organisations with many occasional users, and the requester-only seat model does not solve this as cleanly as it appears; Zuper zuper publishes no pricing at all, and third-party reports span 50 to 150 US dollars per user per month, so you cannot even estimate a budget without a sales conversation.
  • They diverge on capability: MaintainX covers Mobile work orders, Zuper covers Work order management.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which MaintainX and Zuper actually diverge.

Attributes where MaintainX and Zuper differ
AttributeMaintainXZuper
Starting priceFreeOn request
Pricing modelFreemium, per user per monthquote
Free tierYesNo

Identical on both: platforms (Web, iOS, Android), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Field Service).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in MaintainX

  • Mobile work orders
  • Offline mode
  • Preventive maintenance
  • Digital procedures
  • Parts inventory
  • Asset history

Only in Zuper

  • Work order management
  • Intelligent dispatch
  • Technician mobile
  • Inventory
  • Job costing
  • Open API and webhooks
  • AI agents
  • Customer portal

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

MaintainX

  • Maintenance teams replacing paper work orders and whiteboardsnot Zuper
  • Plants needing technicians to log work at the machine rather than back at a terminalnot Zuper
  • Multi-site facilities operations wanting one asset history across locationsnot Zuper
  • Organisations that must evidence preventive maintenance for audit or insurancenot Zuper

Zuper

  • A service business whose customer records already live in Salesforce or HubSpot wants field execution underneath rather than a platform that insists on owning the customer.not MaintainX
  • A solar or utility contractor needs work orders driven by an external asset or billing system through an API rather than entered by a dispatcher.not MaintainX
  • A multi-location or franchise operation needs consistent job workflows and reporting across sites with an existing enterprise finance system to feed.not MaintainX
  • A support organisation already running Zendesk or Freshdesk wants field visits raised from tickets and closed back into them without a middleware project.not MaintainX

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

MaintainX

  • Per-user pricing punishes organisations with many occasional users, and the requester-only seat model does not solve this as cleanly as it appears
  • Reporting is adequate rather than deep, and teams wanting genuine reliability analytics generally export to a BI tool
  • Parts inventory sits behind the Premium tier, which is a steep jump from Essential for a feature many maintenance teams treat as core
  • Integration with heavyweight ERP is available but real SAP or Oracle projects need work beyond the connector
  • Less suited to complex asset hierarchies and condition-based maintenance than an established enterprise asset management platform

Zuper

  • Zuper publishes no pricing at all, and third-party reports span 50 to 150 US dollars per user per month, so you cannot even estimate a budget without a sales conversation.
  • At the reported rates it costs several times a Jobber or Housecall Pro seat, which makes it hard to justify for a small contractor who will use a fraction of the configuration surface.
  • The flexibility that makes it a good execution layer means it needs configuring: custom statuses, forms and workflow rules are strengths for a business with an operations analyst and a burden for one without.
  • Accounting is integration-only and the finance depth is thin next to platforms with native ledgers, so complex tax, multi-entity or progress billing scenarios push work back into the ERP.
  • It is a younger and smaller vendor than ServiceTitan or FieldEdge with a correspondingly thinner partner and implementation network, so if you need local implementation help outside the main markets you may be dealing directly with the vendor or doing it yourself.

Pricing, plan by plan

MaintainX

Free
  • BasicFree
    • Unlimited work orders
    • Unlimited assets
    • 2 procedure templates
  • Essential$21/user/month
    • Unlimited procedures
    • Preventive maintenance
    • Advanced reporting
  • Premium$69/user/month
    • Parts inventory
    • Purchase orders
    • Meter-based triggers
  • Enterprise$undefined/user/month
    • SSO and SCIM
    • Custom integrations
    • Dedicated success manager

Zuper

On request
  • Starter$undefined/month
    • Core work orders, scheduling and mobile app
    • Standard integrations
    • Priced per user on application
  • Growth$undefined/month
    • Adds inventory, job costing and advanced workflows
    • Quoted on application
  • Enterprise$undefined/month
    • Custom workflows, API access at scale and dedicated support
    • Quoted on application, typically with an annual commitment

Which should you pick?

Choose MaintainX if

  • You need mobile work orders.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want offline mode.
MaintainX review

Choose Zuper if

  • You need work order management.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want intelligent dispatch.
Zuper review

Questions people ask

Is MaintainX or Zuper better?
Neither clearly leads. MaintainX starts at Free and Zuper at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, MaintainX or Zuper?
MaintainX has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for MaintainX and On request for Zuper.
Does MaintainX or Zuper run on more platforms?
Both run on Web, iOS, Android, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
Can I use MaintainX for free?
Yes. MaintainX has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Zuper starts at On request.
What is MaintainX best used for?
MaintainX is most often used for maintenance teams replacing paper work orders and whiteboards, plants needing technicians to log work at the machine rather than back at a terminal, multi-site facilities operations wanting one asset history across locations, organisations that must evidence preventive maintenance for audit or insurance. Of those, maintenance teams replacing paper work orders and whiteboards and plants needing technicians to log work at the machine rather than back at a terminal are not what Zuper is typically brought in for.
What can MaintainX do that Zuper cannot?
MaintainX covers Mobile work orders, Offline mode, Preventive maintenance, Digital procedures. Zuper covers Work order management, Intelligent dispatch, Technician mobile, Inventory.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

MaintainX: Is the free tier actually usable?

Yes. It allows unlimited work orders and assets with the full mobile app, and small teams run on it indefinitely. The limits that push teams to pay are procedure templates, preventive maintenance scheduling and reporting.

Zuper: How much does Zuper cost?

It is not published. Independent reports put it roughly between 50 and 150 US dollars per user per month depending on tier and volume, usually on an annual commitment.

MaintainX: How does it compare to UpKeep?

Both are mobile-first CMMS aimed at the same buyer. MaintainX is generally stronger on procedures and the free tier; UpKeep has a longer history with parts and purchasing. The decision usually comes down to which mobile app the technicians prefer in a trial.

Zuper: Can Zuper run under Salesforce or HubSpot?

Yes, that is one of its main positions. It integrates as a field execution layer rather than requiring you to move the customer record.

MaintainX: Does it work without signal?

Yes. Offline mode is a core feature rather than an add-on, which matters in plant areas and basements where a web-only CMMS is unusable.

Zuper: Does it work offline?

The technician mobile app is built to capture work offline and sync when connectivity returns.

MaintainX: Can it handle multiple sites?

Yes, from the Premium tier. Multi-site asset hierarchies and cross-site reporting are not available on Essential.

Zuper: Is Zuper suitable for a five person contractor?

Usually not on cost. At the reported per-seat rates, Jobber or Housecall Pro deliver the same day-to-day job flow far cheaper.

MaintainX: What is the real cost for a 20-person team?

On Premium at list, roughly 16,560 USD a year before negotiation. Most of the saving comes from designating occasional staff as requesters rather than full users, so count your true licensed seats before comparing quotes.

Share

Related pages

More on MaintainX

More on Zuper

Keep looking

Other head to heads