Softwr

Accounting · head to head

SAP Concur vs Yooz

SAP Concur logo

SAP Concur

Accounting

Enterprise travel booking, expense claims and supplier invoice processing sold as separate modules

From
$29/month
Rated
-
Yooz logo

Yooz

Accounting

AP automation for mid-sized finance teams, with unlimited users included in the subscription

From
$199/month
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: SAP Concur implementation is done through SAP or a partner and commonly costs a substantial multiple of the first year subscription, because the value sits entirely in the configured policy, approval hierarchy and ledger mapping rather than in the software as shipped.; Yooz it is accounts payable only, with no requisitioning, sourcing or contract management, so procurement control has to come from somewhere else.
  • They diverge on capability: SAP Concur covers Expense capture, Yooz covers Automatic coding.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which SAP Concur and Yooz actually diverge.

Attributes where SAP Concur and Yooz differ
AttributeSAP ConcurYooz
Starting price$29/month$199/month
Pricing modelsubscriptionPer month by invoice volume
Founded1993Unknown

Identical on both: free tier (No), platforms (Web, Ios, Android), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Accounting).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in SAP Concur

  • Expense capture
  • Corporate card feeds
  • Policy engine
  • Approval routing
  • Travel booking
  • Travel agency integration
  • Duty of care
  • Purchase request

Only in Yooz

  • Automatic coding
  • Purchase order matching
  • Approval workflow
  • Fraud and duplicate detection
  • Payment initiation
  • Unlimited users
  • E-invoicing readiness

Both cover

  • Invoice capture

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

SAP Concur

  • A multinational with thousands of travellers where an audit committee has asked for evidence that travel policy is actually enforcednot Yooz
  • An organisation replacing spreadsheet expense claims and email approvals that cannot survive an external auditnot Yooz
  • A finance team trying to eliminate duplicate claims by matching corporate card feeds against submitted receiptsnot Yooz
  • A shared service centre processing high volumes of supplier invoices that needs capture and approval routing before postingnot Yooz

Yooz

  • A finance team with thirty occasional approvers that cannot justify per-seat AP automationnot SAP Concur
  • An accounting practice processing invoices on behalf of many client companiesnot SAP Concur
  • A French or European business preparing for mandatory electronic invoicing without buying an enterprise platformnot SAP Concur
  • A company losing early payment discounts because paper invoices sit in someone's tray for two weeksnot SAP Concur

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

SAP Concur

  • Implementation is done through SAP or a partner and commonly costs a substantial multiple of the first year subscription, because the value sits entirely in the configured policy, approval hierarchy and ledger mapping rather than in the software as shipped.
  • Pricing is driven by transaction volume, expense reports and invoices processed, rather than by seats, so a business with seasonal travel or a growth year sees the bill move in ways headcount based budgeting does not predict.
  • The configuration that makes it valuable is also what makes it rigid, and organisations frequently find that changing an approval chain or adding a cost centre dimension requires a partner change order rather than an administrator's afternoon.
  • Contracts are typically multi year with limited exit, so an organisation that concludes after twelve months that a lighter expense tool would have been enough is still paying for the heavier one for the remainder of the term.
  • The three modules are licensed separately and the strongest case for the product depends on having travel, expense and card feeds together, so buying expense alone gives you a costly receipt system without the control loop that justifies the price.

Yooz

  • It is accounts payable only, with no requisitioning, sourcing or contract management, so procurement control has to come from somewhere else.
  • Pricing is published only as a starting point and the real number depends on invoice volume and connector requirements, so the advertised figure understates what most buyers pay.
  • Country compliance depth is strongest in France and francophone Europe; buyers needing many national e-invoicing mandates at once are better served by a vendor built for that.
  • Extraction accuracy on unusual supplier layouts still requires human correction, and the learning improves only with volume, so small-volume users see less benefit from the automation they are paying for.
  • ERP connectors vary in depth between accounting systems, and a shallow connector turns the promised straight-through posting into a periodic file export that someone has to run.

Pricing, plan by plan

SAP Concur

$29/month
  • Professional$8/month
    • Expense reporting
    • Receipt capture
    • Approvals
  • Premium$12/month
    • Travel booking
    • Invoice management
    • Analytics

Yooz

$199/month
  • Entry$199/month
    • Unlimited users
    • Invoice capture, coding and approval workflow
    • Volume allowance applies
  • Volume tiers$undefined/month
    • Priced by monthly invoice volume
    • European mid-market typically €300 to €600 a month at 200 to 500 invoices
    • Purchase order matching and fraud detection

Which should you pick?

Choose SAP Concur if

  • You need expense capture.
  • You work on Web, Ios, Android.
  • You also want corporate card feeds.

Choose Yooz if

  • You need automatic coding.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want purchase order matching.

Questions people ask

Is SAP Concur or Yooz better?
Neither clearly leads. SAP Concur starts at $29/month and Yooz at $199/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, SAP Concur or Yooz?
SAP Concur starts at $29/month and Yooz at $199/month.
Does SAP Concur or Yooz run on more platforms?
SAP Concur runs on Web, Ios, Android. Yooz runs on Web, iOS, Android.
What is SAP Concur best used for?
SAP Concur is most often used for a multinational with thousands of travellers where an audit committee has asked for evidence that travel policy is actually enforced, an organisation replacing spreadsheet expense claims and email approvals that cannot survive an external audit, a finance team trying to eliminate duplicate claims by matching corporate card feeds against submitted receipts, a shared service centre processing high volumes of supplier invoices that needs capture and approval routing before posting. Of those, a multinational with thousands of travellers where an audit committee has asked for evidence that travel policy is actually enforced and an organisation replacing spreadsheet expense claims and email approvals that cannot survive an external audit are not what Yooz is typically brought in for.
What can SAP Concur do that Yooz cannot?
SAP Concur covers Expense capture, Corporate card feeds, Policy engine, Approval routing. Yooz covers Automatic coding, Purchase order matching, Approval workflow, Fraud and duplicate detection. Both handle Invoice capture.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

SAP Concur: Do we need SAP ERP to use Concur?

No. It integrates with SAP systems particularly well but it is regularly deployed alongside Oracle, NetSuite, Workday and other ledgers. The integration work is a line item in the implementation either way.

Yooz: How is it priced?

On monthly invoice volume, with unlimited users included. Entry pricing is around $199 a month, and European mid-market deployments commonly land at €300 to €600.

SAP Concur: Is it worth it for a company of a hundred people?

Usually not. Below a few hundred travellers the implementation cost and the contract commitment are hard to justify against lighter expense tools. The case turns on policy enforcement and audit, not on receipt scanning.

Yooz: Are there per-user charges?

No, and that is its main commercial advantage over competitors that meter approvers.

SAP Concur: How is it priced?

Broadly on the volume of expense reports and invoices processed, with the modules licensed separately. Because pricing is quoted rather than published, get the volume assumptions written into the contract and check what happens when you exceed them.

Yooz: Does it do procurement as well?

No. It automates accounts payable. Requisitions, sourcing and contracts need a separate system.

SAP Concur: Can it handle multiple countries and currencies?

Yes, that is one of its stronger areas, including per country tax treatment and VAT reclaim identification. Confirm coverage for your specific countries during the sales process rather than assuming global means every jurisdiction.

Yooz: Is it ready for European e-invoicing mandates?

Yes for France and francophone Europe in particular. For a wide multi-country mandate footprint, compare against a vendor built for that specific problem.

SAP Concur: How long does implementation take?

Plan in months, not weeks, for anything beyond a single entity with simple approvals. Multi entity rollouts with travel and invoice modules commonly run across a year in phases.

SAP Concur: What does the audit service actually do?

It has a team review a sample or all of your submitted claims against receipts and policy before approval, which some organisations use in place of internal reviewers. It is priced separately from the expense subscription.

Share

Related pages

Other head to heads