Softwr

Accounting · head to head

Medius vs Yooz

Medius logo

Medius

Accounting

Accounts payable automation and supplier payments for mid-market finance teams, Marlin Equity owned

From
On request
Rated
-
Yooz logo

Yooz

Accounting

AP automation for mid-sized finance teams, with unlimited users included in the subscription

From
$199/month
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Medius the sourcing, contract and procurement modules are considerably less developed than the AP core, so buying Medius as a full source-to-pay suite means accepting weak upstream tooling.; Yooz it is accounts payable only, with no requisitioning, sourcing or contract management, so procurement control has to come from somewhere else.
  • They diverge on capability: Medius covers Invoice capture and coding, Yooz covers Invoice capture.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Medius and Yooz actually diverge.

Attributes where Medius and Yooz differ
AttributeMediusYooz
Starting priceOn request$199/month
Pricing modelquotePer month by invoice volume

Identical on both: free tier (No), platforms (Web, iOS, Android), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Accounting).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Medius

  • Invoice capture and coding
  • Matching and exception handling
  • Fraud and anomaly detection
  • Supplier payments
  • ERP integration

Only in Yooz

  • Invoice capture
  • Automatic coding
  • Purchase order matching
  • Fraud and duplicate detection
  • Payment initiation
  • Unlimited users
  • E-invoicing readiness

Both cover

  • Approval workflow

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Medius

  • A mid-market finance team where most spend arrives as an invoice with no purchase order to match againstnot Yooz
  • A group with several legal entities on different ERPs that wants one AP process across all of themnot Yooz
  • Reducing invoice fraud exposure with automated detection of supplier bank detail changesnot Yooz
  • Replacing a scanning bureau and a shared AP inbox with automated capture and exception-based reviewnot Yooz

Yooz

  • A finance team with thirty occasional approvers that cannot justify per-seat AP automationnot Medius
  • An accounting practice processing invoices on behalf of many client companiesnot Medius
  • A French or European business preparing for mandatory electronic invoicing without buying an enterprise platformnot Medius
  • A company losing early payment discounts because paper invoices sit in someone's tray for two weeksnot Medius

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Medius

  • The sourcing, contract and procurement modules are considerably less developed than the AP core, so buying Medius as a full source-to-pay suite means accepting weak upstream tooling.
  • Pricing is quote-only and driven by invoice volume, so a business with many low-value invoices pays disproportionately relative to the spend being controlled.
  • Payments are billed on transaction volume separately from the AP subscription, which is easy to omit from a cost comparison against a licence-only AP tool.
  • Private equity ownership since 2017 has produced an acquisition-driven product line, so payments and adjacent capability come from bought-in technology rather than the original platform.
  • ERP integration depth varies sharply by system, and organisations on less common or heavily customised ERPs face integration work that lengthens the implementation.

Yooz

  • It is accounts payable only, with no requisitioning, sourcing or contract management, so procurement control has to come from somewhere else.
  • Pricing is published only as a starting point and the real number depends on invoice volume and connector requirements, so the advertised figure understates what most buyers pay.
  • Country compliance depth is strongest in France and francophone Europe; buyers needing many national e-invoicing mandates at once are better served by a vendor built for that.
  • Extraction accuracy on unusual supplier layouts still requires human correction, and the learning improves only with volume, so small-volume users see less benefit from the automation they are paying for.
  • ERP connectors vary in depth between accounting systems, and a shallow connector turns the promised straight-through posting into a periodic file export that someone has to run.

Pricing, plan by plan

Medius

On request
  • Medius AP Automation$undefined/year
    • Two packaged AP automation tiers
    • Priced by invoice volume and entity count
    • Sourcing, contracts and procurement modules sold separately

Yooz

$199/month
  • Entry$199/month
    • Unlimited users
    • Invoice capture, coding and approval workflow
    • Volume allowance applies
  • Volume tiers$undefined/month
    • Priced by monthly invoice volume
    • European mid-market typically €300 to €600 a month at 200 to 500 invoices
    • Purchase order matching and fraud detection

Which should you pick?

Choose Medius if

  • You need invoice capture and coding.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want matching and exception handling.

Choose Yooz if

  • You need invoice capture.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want automatic coding.

Questions people ask

Is Medius or Yooz better?
Neither clearly leads. Medius starts at On request and Yooz at $199/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Medius or Yooz?
Medius starts at On request and Yooz at $199/month.
Does Medius or Yooz run on more platforms?
Both run on Web, iOS, Android, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
What is Medius best used for?
Medius is most often used for a mid-market finance team where most spend arrives as an invoice with no purchase order to match against, a group with several legal entities on different erps that wants one ap process across all of them, reducing invoice fraud exposure with automated detection of supplier bank detail changes, replacing a scanning bureau and a shared ap inbox with automated capture and exception-based review. Of those, a mid-market finance team where most spend arrives as an invoice with no purchase order to match against and a group with several legal entities on different erps that wants one ap process across all of them are not what Yooz is typically brought in for.
What can Medius do that Yooz cannot?
Medius covers Invoice capture and coding, Matching and exception handling, Fraud and anomaly detection, Supplier payments. Yooz covers Invoice capture, Automatic coding, Purchase order matching, Fraud and duplicate detection. Both handle Approval workflow.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Medius: Is Medius a procurement suite or an AP tool?

Primarily an AP automation platform with procurement modules attached. If sourcing is your main requirement, look elsewhere.

Yooz: How is it priced?

On monthly invoice volume, with unlimited users included. Entry pricing is around $199 a month, and European mid-market deployments commonly land at €300 to €600.

Medius: Who owns Medius?

Marlin Equity Partners, which acquired it in 2017 and has funded several bolt-on acquisitions since.

Yooz: Are there per-user charges?

No, and that is its main commercial advantage over competitors that meter approvers.

Medius: How is it priced?

By quote, driven by invoice volume and entity count, with payments billed separately on transaction volume.

Yooz: Does it do procurement as well?

No. It automates accounts payable. Requisitions, sourcing and contracts need a separate system.

Medius: Does it replace our ERP?

No. It sits alongside the ERP and posts approved invoices into it.

Yooz: Is it ready for European e-invoicing mandates?

Yes for France and francophone Europe in particular. For a wide multi-country mandate footprint, compare against a vendor built for that specific problem.

Share

Related pages

Other head to heads