Construction · head to head
GCPay vs Reconstruct

GCPay
Construction
Subcontractor pay application and lien waiver exchange for general contractors in North America
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Reconstruct
Construction
Reality capture and progress tracking that aligns site imagery to the model and the schedule
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: GCPay the subcontractor is a compelled user who did not choose the tool, so adoption friction and support load fall on the general contractor, and small trades with one bookkeeper resent every extra portal.; Reconstruct pricing is quoted with nothing published, so a buyer cannot sanity-check a proposal against a list rate and has no way to know whether the price scales with projects, square footage or users until deep in the sales process.
- They diverge on capability: GCPay covers Pay application workflow, Reconstruct covers Device-agnostic capture.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GCPay and Reconstruct actually diverge.
| Attribute | GCPay | Reconstruct |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web | Web, iOS, Android |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Construction).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GCPay
- Pay application workflow
- Lien waiver exchange
- Compliance tracking
- Change order management
- ePayments
- Retainage handling
- ERP integration
- Subcontractor portal
Only in Reconstruct
- Device-agnostic capture
- Photogrammetry and mesh generation
- 4D schedule alignment
- Design overlay
- Time slider
- Measurement tools
- Issue tracking
- Remote walkthrough
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GCPay
- A general contractor in a strict lien state that has been burned by a missing unconditional waiver and needs waiver status tied to each payment rather than filed in a shared drivenot Reconstruct
- A contractor whose accounts payable team spends the first week of every month rekeying pay applications from PDF emails into Sage or Viewpointnot Reconstruct
- An owner-facing GC that must produce a clean audit trail of who was paid what and when, with insurance compliance evidence attachednot Reconstruct
- A construction group standardising on Autodesk Construction Cloud that wants payment application data in the same estate as the project recordnot Reconstruct
Reconstruct
- A general contractor whose monthly progress claim is regularly challenged by the owner, needing dated visual evidence tied to schedule activities rather than a folder of photosnot GCPay
- An owner running projects in several countries who wants to cut executive site visits without accepting the contractor’s self-reported percentage completenot GCPay
- A healthcare or data centre fit-out where above-ceiling services must be recorded before they are closed up, so later maintenance does not require demolitionnot GCPay
- A delay or defect dispute where the decisive question is what was physically in place on a specific date and the only other evidence is contested emailnot GCPay
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GCPay
- The subcontractor is a compelled user who did not choose the tool, so adoption friction and support load fall on the general contractor, and small trades with one bookkeeper resent every extra portal.
- Pricing is entirely quoted and keyed to annual subcontracted construction value, which means a contractor with a few very large subcontracts can pay far more than one with many small ones for identical functionality.
- The ePayment fee structure is decided per general contractor, so a subcontractor cannot predict its cost of getting paid across clients and may be charged on one job and not another for the same work.
- It is a payment and compliance system, not job costing; commitments still have to reconcile against the ERP, and integration gaps mean many contractors run a manual check anyway.
- Autodesk acquired parent Payapps in 2024, and the strategic direction is convergence with Autodesk Construction Cloud, so buyers on Procore or a non-Autodesk stack should ask directly what the roadmap commitment to their platform is.
Reconstruct
- Pricing is quoted with nothing published, so a buyer cannot sanity-check a proposal against a list rate and has no way to know whether the price scales with projects, square footage or users until deep in the sales process.
- The whole value depends on disciplined recurring capture, and site teams treat walking the building with a camera as a low-priority chore, so datasets go stale exactly when a dispute makes them valuable.
- Photogrammetry from handheld footage is less accurate than laser scanning, so it is fine for progress and coordination but should not be relied on for tight as-built tolerances or prefabrication dimensions.
- Schedule alignment requires a well-structured schedule with activities that map to physical locations; on projects where the programme is a coarse rolled-up bar chart the progress calculation is close to meaningless.
- It is another platform alongside Procore or Autodesk Construction Cloud rather than a replacement, so buyers add a subscription and a workflow rather than consolidating one, and the business case has to survive that.
Pricing, plan by plan
GCPay
On request- GCPay for General Contractors$undefined/year
- Priced on project count, subcontractor count and annual subcontracted volume
- Unlimited free subcontractor accounts
- Lien waiver and compliance tracking
- ePayments and Waiver Exchange$undefined/month
- Per-transaction fee disclosed at submission
- General contractor may absorb the fee or pass it to the subcontractor
- Subcontractor must acknowledge the fee before submitting
Reconstruct
On request- Reconstruct$undefined/year
- Quoted per project or per portfolio
- Unlimited capture devices
- 4D schedule alignment
Which should you pick?
Choose Reconstruct if
- You need device-agnostic capture.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want photogrammetry and mesh generation.
Questions people ask
- Is GCPay or Reconstruct better?
- Neither clearly leads. GCPay starts at On request and Reconstruct at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GCPay or Reconstruct?
- GCPay starts at On request and Reconstruct at On request.
- Does GCPay or Reconstruct run on more platforms?
- GCPay runs on Web. Reconstruct runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is GCPay best used for?
- GCPay is most often used for a general contractor in a strict lien state that has been burned by a missing unconditional waiver and needs waiver status tied to each payment rather than filed in a shared drive, a contractor whose accounts payable team spends the first week of every month rekeying pay applications from pdf emails into sage or viewpoint, an owner-facing gc that must produce a clean audit trail of who was paid what and when, with insurance compliance evidence attached, a construction group standardising on autodesk construction cloud that wants payment application data in the same estate as the project record. Of those, a general contractor in a strict lien state that has been burned by a missing unconditional waiver and needs waiver status tied to each payment rather than filed in a shared drive and a contractor whose accounts payable team spends the first week of every month rekeying pay applications from pdf emails into sage or viewpoint are not what Reconstruct is typically brought in for.
- What can GCPay do that Reconstruct cannot?
- GCPay covers Pay application workflow, Lien waiver exchange, Compliance tracking, Change order management. Reconstruct covers Device-agnostic capture, Photogrammetry and mesh generation, 4D schedule alignment, Design overlay.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
GCPay: Who pays for GCPay, the GC or the sub?
The general contractor pays the subscription. Subcontractor accounts are free. Only the optional ePayment and waiver exchange transaction fee can be passed to the subcontractor, and only with their acknowledgement.
Reconstruct: How much does Reconstruct cost?
Not published. It is quoted per project or portfolio. Ask specifically whether the price scales by project count, square footage or capture volume, because those give very different totals.
GCPay: How much is the ePayment fee?
It is a flat per-transaction fee, disclosed at the point the pay application is submitted. GCPay has published a $15 figure for the ePayments and waiver exchange service, and the GC decides who bears it.
Reconstruct: Do we need a drone or a laser scanner?
No. It works from 360 cameras and even smartphone video. Drones and scanners improve exterior and accuracy-critical coverage.
GCPay: Is GCPay owned by Autodesk?
Yes. Autodesk agreed to acquire Payapps, which trades as GCPay in North America and Payapps elsewhere, in January 2024.
Reconstruct: How accurate is it?
Accurate enough for progress, coordination and dispute evidence. It is not a substitute for survey-grade laser scanning where tolerances matter.
GCPay: Does it replace our construction accounting system?
No. It handles the application, approval and compliance workflow and then pushes approved payments into your ERP.
Reconstruct: Who owns the captured data at closeout?
The customer. Confirm the export format and retention terms in the contract before handover, because a reality archive is only useful if you can still open it in five years.
GCPay: Can subcontractors export their own records?
Subcontractors can download their submitted applications and waivers, but the project record belongs to the general contractor's account, so a sub should keep its own copies rather than rely on continued portal access.
Reconstruct: Does it replace Procore?
No. It integrates with Procore and Autodesk Construction Cloud and adds the visual as-built layer.
Related pages
More on Reconstruct
Other head to heads
- GCPay vs Foundation Software
- GCPay vs Procore
- GCPay vs Oracle Textura Payment Management
- GCPay vs Trimble Pay
- GCPay vs Assignar
- GCPay vs Siteline
- GCPay vs Clearstory
- GCPay vs Kojo
- GCPay vs Adaptive
- GCPay vs Document Crunch
- GCPay vs HammerTech
- GCPay vs ConstructConnect
- GCPay vs Buildots
- GCPay vs Buildxact
- GCPay vs Chief Architect
- GCPay vs CMiC
- GCPay vs CoConstruct
- GCPay vs Dalux
- GCPay vs Skydio Dock for X10
- GCPay vs Autodesk Construction Cloud
- GCPay vs Propeller Aero
- GCPay vs Openspace
- GCPay vs HCSS
- GCPay vs HCSS HeavyBid
- GCPay vs Oracle Primavera Unifier
- GCPay vs Togal.AI
- GCPay vs Trunk Tools
- GCPay vs Briq
- GCPay vs Buildertrend
- GCPay vs Cubit Estimating
- GCPay vs BuildingConnected
- Reconstruct vs Foundation Software
- Reconstruct vs Procore
- Reconstruct vs Oracle Textura Payment Management
- Reconstruct vs Trimble Pay
- Reconstruct vs Assignar
- Reconstruct vs Siteline
- Reconstruct vs Clearstory
- Reconstruct vs Kojo
- Reconstruct vs Adaptive
- Reconstruct vs Document Crunch
- Reconstruct vs HammerTech
- Reconstruct vs ConstructConnect
- Reconstruct vs Buildots
- Reconstruct vs Buildxact
- Reconstruct vs Chief Architect
- Reconstruct vs CMiC
- Reconstruct vs CoConstruct
- Reconstruct vs Dalux
- Reconstruct vs Skydio Dock for X10
- Reconstruct vs Autodesk Construction Cloud
- Reconstruct vs Propeller Aero
- Reconstruct vs Openspace
- Reconstruct vs HCSS
- Reconstruct vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Reconstruct vs Oracle Primavera Unifier
- Reconstruct vs Togal.AI
- Reconstruct vs Trunk Tools
- Reconstruct vs Briq
- Reconstruct vs Buildertrend
- Reconstruct vs Cubit Estimating
- Reconstruct vs BuildingConnected
