Reconstructvs
Procore
Procore: If you need one project management platform first and can add reality capture later
Reconstruct
Reality capture and progress tracking that aligns site imagery to the model and the schedule
As of 1 September 2026, Reconstruct's pricing is not published; the vendor quotes on request. Turns 360 video, phone footage and drone imagery into a measurable, time-stamped 3D record of a site and compares it against the BIM model and the programme. Softwr lists it under Construction. Reconstruct is made by Reconstruct Inc, available on Web, iOS, Android.
Overview
What Reconstruct does
Reconstruct processes site imagery captured on almost any device, including 360 cameras, smartphones and drones, and produces a georeferenced, measurable reality model. That model is then aligned to design drawings, the BIM model and the construction schedule, so a user can pick a date and a location and see what was actually built there against what should have been. The distinguishing capability is the alignment rather than the capture. Plenty of tools stitch 360 walkthroughs. Reconstruct ties the captured geometry to schedule activities, which is what turns a visual record into a progress percentage and, more importantly, into evidence. Contractors use that evidence in two commercially serious places: monthly progress claims that an owner would otherwise dispute, and delay analysis where the question is what existed on a given date. Buyers are general contractors, owners and construction managers on commercial, healthcare, airport and infrastructure work, particularly where senior staff are travelling to sites mainly to see whether the reported percentage is real. The trade-off is capture discipline. Reconstruct depends on somebody walking the site consistently, and the moment weekly capture slips to fortnightly the schedule comparison degrades into a photo archive.
What people use it for
- A general contractor whose monthly progress claim is regularly challenged by the owner, needing dated visual evidence tied to schedule activities rather than a folder of photos
- An owner running projects in several countries who wants to cut executive site visits without accepting the contractor’s self-reported percentage complete
- A healthcare or data centre fit-out where above-ceiling services must be recorded before they are closed up, so later maintenance does not require demolition
- A delay or defect dispute where the decisive question is what was physically in place on a specific date and the only other evidence is contested email
The honest half
Where it falls short
Concrete and checkable, so you can decide whether any of them matter to you. This is the half of a review a vendor will not write about Reconstruct.
- Pricing is quoted with nothing published, so a buyer cannot sanity-check a proposal against a list rate and has no way to know whether the price scales with projects, square footage or users until deep in the sales process.
- The whole value depends on disciplined recurring capture, and site teams treat walking the building with a camera as a low-priority chore, so datasets go stale exactly when a dispute makes them valuable.
- Photogrammetry from handheld footage is less accurate than laser scanning, so it is fine for progress and coordination but should not be relied on for tight as-built tolerances or prefabrication dimensions.
- Schedule alignment requires a well-structured schedule with activities that map to physical locations; on projects where the programme is a coarse rolled-up bar chart the progress calculation is close to meaningless.
- It is another platform alongside Procore or Autodesk Construction Cloud rather than a replacement, so buyers add a subscription and a workflow rather than consolidating one, and the business case has to survive that.
Cross-shopped
What people choose instead of Reconstruct
Each pairing was judged by two reviewers asking whether a buyer would genuinely weigh the two against each other. The ones that failed were deleted rather than published.
- ReconstructvsAutodesk Construction Cloud
Autodesk Construction Cloud: Includes reality capture workflows in the same estate as the model and documents
- ReconstructvsDalux
Dalux: A cheaper route to model-linked site walkthroughs for teams that mainly want field BIM access
Pricing
What Reconstruct costs
Taken from the vendor's own pricing page. Prices move, so check before you buy.
Reconstruct
On request
- Quoted per project or per portfolio
- Unlimited capture devices
- 4D schedule alignment
- Onboarding and capture training
Capabilities
Features
Device-agnostic capture
Build reality models from 360 cameras, smartphone video, drones and laser scans
Photogrammetry and mesh generation
Produce measurable 3D meshes and point clouds from ordinary site footage
4D schedule alignment
Link captured reality to schedule activities to compute and visualise progress by date
Design overlay
Compare as-built geometry against BIM or 2D drawings to surface deviations
Time slider
Step backwards through captures to establish what existed at any point in the project
Measurement tools
Take dimensions directly from the reality model without returning to site
Issue tracking
Pin observations to a location and date and route them to a responsible party
Remote walkthrough
Let off-site stakeholders navigate the site as it was on a chosen date
Answered, with sources
Questions people ask
Each answer names the page it came from, so you can check it rather than take our word for it.
How much does Reconstruct cost?
Not published. It is quoted per project or portfolio. Ask specifically whether the price scales by project count, square footage or capture volume, because those give very different totals.
Do we need a drone or a laser scanner?
No. It works from 360 cameras and even smartphone video. Drones and scanners improve exterior and accuracy-critical coverage.
How accurate is it?
Accurate enough for progress, coordination and dispute evidence. It is not a substitute for survey-grade laser scanning where tolerances matter.
Who owns the captured data at closeout?
The customer. Confirm the export format and retention terms in the contract before handover, because a reality archive is only useful if you can still open it in five years.
Does it replace Procore?
No. It integrates with Procore and Autodesk Construction Cloud and adds the visual as-built layer.
Keep looking
Where to go from Reconstruct
- Reconstruct alternativesEvery product people weigh against it
- Reconstruct pricingPlans, floors and what the tiers exclude
- Reconstruct badgesWhich rules it meets, and the figure behind each
- All Construction softwareThe full category
- Best Construction softwareThe shortlist, and how it was cut
Best Construction software for
Compare Reconstruct with
- Dalux
- Skydio Dock for X10
- Procore
- Autodesk Construction Cloud
- Buildots
- Propeller Aero
- Openspace
- HCSS
- HCSS HeavyBid
- Oracle Primavera Unifier
- Togal.AI
- Trunk Tools
- Briq
- Buildertrend
- ConstructConnect
- Cubit Estimating
- Dalux
- BuildingConnected
Other Construction software
BIM viewing, snagging and field quality control for construction and facilities teams
Free plan12 researched notesWeatherproof autonomous drone base for remote-operated inspection and site documentation flights
Pricing on request13 researched notesUnified platform for construction project delivery
Pricing on request11 researched notesHard hat mounted 360 cameras and computer vision that score build progress against the BIM model
Pricing on request12 researched notesDrone survey processing and earthworks volume measurement for sites that measure stockpiles weekly
Pricing on request12 researched notesEstimating, field time and equipment software for heavy civil and infrastructure contractors
Pricing on request12 researched notesHeavy civil estimating software built around crews, equipment and production rates
Pricing on request12 researched notesCapital programme cost, contract and facilities management for owners running multi-year portfolios
Pricing on request13 researched notesAutomated drawing takeoff that measures and labels spaces without manual tracing
From $299/mo12 researched notesAnswers questions from a project document set with citations, so field staff stop hunting drawings
Pricing on request12 researched notesFinancial automation and forecasting for contractors sitting on top of construction ERP
Pricing on request12 researched notesConstruction project management for home builders and remodelers
From $199/mo11 researched notesAustralian estimating and on-screen takeoff in one window, priced openly per user per month
From A$167/mo12 researched notesBIM viewing, snagging and field quality control for construction and facilities teams
Free plan12 researched notes
Softwr does not host reviews and shows no star rating for Reconstruct, because a rating we did not collect is not ours to publish. What is here is the pricing and platform detail from the vendor’s own pages, limitations we could state concretely, and alternatives a reviewer confirmed people weigh against it. Tell us if any of it is wrong.
More on Reconstruct
Reconstruct alternatives
What people switch to, and what they give up
Reconstruct pricing
Every tier, and where the cost actually lands
Compare Reconstruct
Put it head to head with anything we hold
Reconstruct badge
Its rating, and an embed for your own site
Best Construction software alternatives
Hard hat mounted 360 cameras and computer vision that score build progress against the BIM model
quote
Subcontractor pay application and lien waiver exchange for general contractors in North America
quote
Generative construction scheduling that produces and compares millions of build sequences
quoteAustralian estimating and on-screen takeoff in one window, priced openly per user per month
Per user per month
Heavy civil estimating and bidding built on crew, equipment and production rates rather than unit prices
quote