Construction · head to head
Dalux vs Reconstruct

Dalux
Construction
BIM viewing, snagging and field quality control for construction and facilities teams
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Reconstruct
Construction
Reality capture and progress tracking that aligns site imagery to the model and the schedule
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Dalux has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Dalux no pricing is published for any paid module, so comparing Dalux against Procore or Autodesk Construction Cloud on cost requires entering a sales process and waiting for a quote you cannot benchmark.; Reconstruct pricing is quoted with nothing published, so a buyer cannot sanity-check a proposal against a list rate and has no way to know whether the price scales with projects, square footage or users until deep in the sales process.
- They diverge on capability: Dalux covers Mobile BIM viewer, Reconstruct covers Device-agnostic capture.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Dalux and Reconstruct actually diverge.
| Attribute | Dalux | Reconstruct |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android, Windows | Web, iOS, Android |
Identical on both: pricing model (quote), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Construction).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Dalux
- Mobile BIM viewer
- Field snagging
- Dalux Box
- InfraField
- Dalux FM
- Handover
- Checklists and forms
- Free viewer tier
Only in Reconstruct
- Device-agnostic capture
- Photogrammetry and mesh generation
- 4D schedule alignment
- Design overlay
- Time slider
- Measurement tools
- Issue tracking
- Remote walkthrough
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Dalux
- A Nordic main contractor wants every subcontractor raising and closing snags in one system without paying a seat fee for each trade, so the free Field Basic tier carries the supply chain.not Reconstruct
- An engineering consultancy needs site staff to interrogate a federated model on a phone in a basement with no signal, where a browser-based viewer would be useless.not Reconstruct
- A public asset owner wants the as-built model and asset register to survive handover into an FM system rather than arriving as a pallet of ring binders.not Reconstruct
- A rail or highways contractor needs quality records located by chainage along a route rather than by level and grid on a building floor plan, which is what InfraField exists for.not Reconstruct
Reconstruct
- A general contractor whose monthly progress claim is regularly challenged by the owner, needing dated visual evidence tied to schedule activities rather than a folder of photosnot Dalux
- An owner running projects in several countries who wants to cut executive site visits without accepting the contractor’s self-reported percentage completenot Dalux
- A healthcare or data centre fit-out where above-ceiling services must be recorded before they are closed up, so later maintenance does not require demolitionnot Dalux
- A delay or defect dispute where the decisive question is what was physically in place on a specific date and the only other evidence is contested emailnot Dalux
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Dalux
- No pricing is published for any paid module, so comparing Dalux against Procore or Autodesk Construction Cloud on cost requires entering a sales process and waiting for a quote you cannot benchmark.
- There is no cost management, estimating, budgeting or payment application functionality, so commercial teams keep a separate system and someone reconciles the two by hand.
- The integration catalogue is thin next to the American incumbents, and ERP or finance connections generally mean custom work through the API rather than a listed connector.
- Support, documentation and product terminology are strongest in Danish and Northern European construction conventions, and teams working to AIA or other North American contract norms will find the workflows do not map cleanly.
- The free tier is deliberately limited: Field Basic has no checklists, no document control and no reporting, so the free users your subcontractors get are consumers of information rather than participants in a controlled process, and upgrading them is a paid conversation.
Reconstruct
- Pricing is quoted with nothing published, so a buyer cannot sanity-check a proposal against a list rate and has no way to know whether the price scales with projects, square footage or users until deep in the sales process.
- The whole value depends on disciplined recurring capture, and site teams treat walking the building with a camera as a low-priority chore, so datasets go stale exactly when a dispute makes them valuable.
- Photogrammetry from handheld footage is less accurate than laser scanning, so it is fine for progress and coordination but should not be relied on for tight as-built tolerances or prefabrication dimensions.
- Schedule alignment requires a well-structured schedule with activities that map to physical locations; on projects where the programme is a coarse rolled-up bar chart the progress calculation is close to meaningless.
- It is another platform alongside Procore or Autodesk Construction Cloud rather than a replacement, so buyers add a subscription and a workflow rather than consolidating one, and the business case has to survive that.
Pricing, plan by plan
Dalux
Free- BIM Viewer and Field Basic$undefined/year
- Federated model viewing on desktop and mobile
- Basic snagging against drawings and BIM
- Unlimited invited project members at no cost
- Dalux Field, Box, InfraField, Handover, FM$undefined/year
- Full quality, safety and document control workflows
- Handover and tender modules
- Facilities management on the as-built model
Reconstruct
On request- Reconstruct$undefined/year
- Quoted per project or per portfolio
- Unlimited capture devices
- 4D schedule alignment
Which should you pick?
Choose Dalux if
- You need mobile bim viewer.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Windows.
- You also want field snagging.
Choose Reconstruct if
- You need device-agnostic capture.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want photogrammetry and mesh generation.
Questions people ask
- Is Dalux or Reconstruct better?
- Neither clearly leads. Dalux starts at Free and Reconstruct at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Dalux or Reconstruct?
- Dalux has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Dalux and On request for Reconstruct.
- Does Dalux or Reconstruct run on more platforms?
- Dalux runs on Web, iOS, Android, Windows. Reconstruct runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Dalux for free?
- Yes. Dalux has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Reconstruct starts at On request.
- What is Dalux best used for?
- Dalux is most often used for a nordic main contractor wants every subcontractor raising and closing snags in one system without paying a seat fee for each trade, so the free field basic tier carries the supply chain., an engineering consultancy needs site staff to interrogate a federated model on a phone in a basement with no signal, where a browser-based viewer would be useless., a public asset owner wants the as-built model and asset register to survive handover into an fm system rather than arriving as a pallet of ring binders., a rail or highways contractor needs quality records located by chainage along a route rather than by level and grid on a building floor plan, which is what infrafield exists for.. Of those, a nordic main contractor wants every subcontractor raising and closing snags in one system without paying a seat fee for each trade, so the free field basic tier carries the supply chain. and an engineering consultancy needs site staff to interrogate a federated model on a phone in a basement with no signal, where a browser-based viewer would be useless. are not what Reconstruct is typically brought in for.
- What can Dalux do that Reconstruct cannot?
- Dalux covers Mobile BIM viewer, Field snagging, Dalux Box, InfraField. Reconstruct covers Device-agnostic capture, Photogrammetry and mesh generation, 4D schedule alignment, Design overlay.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Dalux: Is Dalux really free?
BIM Viewer and Field Basic are genuinely free with unlimited invited users. Dalux Box, the full Field product, InfraField, Handover, Tender and FM are paid and quoted privately.
Reconstruct: How much does Reconstruct cost?
Not published. It is quoted per project or portfolio. Ask specifically whether the price scales by project count, square footage or capture volume, because those give very different totals.
Dalux: Does Dalux work offline on site?
Yes. Models, drawings and snags sync to the device and the mobile apps are built to work in basements and lift shafts, syncing when signal returns.
Reconstruct: Do we need a drone or a laser scanner?
No. It works from 360 cameras and even smartphone video. Drones and scanners improve exterior and accuracy-critical coverage.
Dalux: Can Dalux replace Procore?
Not on the commercial side. It covers field quality, safety, documents and handover, but has no cost control, budgets or payment applications.
Reconstruct: How accurate is it?
Accurate enough for progress, coordination and dispute evidence. It is not a substitute for survey-grade laser scanning where tolerances matter.
Dalux: Is it available outside Europe?
It is sold globally and the apps are multilingual, but the customer base, partner network and support hours are centred on Northern Europe.
Reconstruct: Who owns the captured data at closeout?
The customer. Confirm the export format and retention terms in the contract before handover, because a reality archive is only useful if you can still open it in five years.
Reconstruct: Does it replace Procore?
No. It integrates with Procore and Autodesk Construction Cloud and adds the visual as-built layer.
Related pages
More on Reconstruct
Other head to heads
- Dalux vs Fieldwire
- Dalux vs Procore
- Dalux vs Autodesk Construction Cloud
- Dalux vs Buildots
- Dalux vs RIB CostX
- Dalux vs Togal.AI
- Dalux vs Raken
- Dalux vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Dalux vs HCSS
- Dalux vs Cubit Estimating
- Dalux vs CMiC
- Dalux vs CoConstruct
- Dalux vs Contractor Foreman
- Dalux vs Document Crunch
- Dalux vs GCPay
- Dalux vs HammerTech
- Dalux vs Autodesk Revit
- Dalux vs Skydio Dock for X10
- Dalux vs Propeller Aero
- Dalux vs Openspace
- Dalux vs Oracle Primavera Unifier
- Dalux vs Trunk Tools
- Dalux vs Briq
- Dalux vs Buildertrend
- Dalux vs ConstructConnect
- Dalux vs BuildingConnected
- Reconstruct vs Fieldwire
- Reconstruct vs Procore
- Reconstruct vs Autodesk Construction Cloud
- Reconstruct vs Buildots
- Reconstruct vs RIB CostX
- Reconstruct vs Togal.AI
- Reconstruct vs Raken
- Reconstruct vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Reconstruct vs HCSS
- Reconstruct vs Cubit Estimating
- Reconstruct vs CMiC
- Reconstruct vs CoConstruct
- Reconstruct vs Contractor Foreman
- Reconstruct vs Document Crunch
- Reconstruct vs GCPay
- Reconstruct vs HammerTech
- Reconstruct vs Autodesk Revit
- Reconstruct vs Skydio Dock for X10
- Reconstruct vs Propeller Aero
- Reconstruct vs Openspace
- Reconstruct vs Oracle Primavera Unifier
- Reconstruct vs Trunk Tools
- Reconstruct vs Briq
- Reconstruct vs Buildertrend
- Reconstruct vs ConstructConnect
- Reconstruct vs BuildingConnected
