Marketing · head to head
Onclusive vs Plausible

Onclusive
Marketing
Media monitoring, journalist database and PR measurement assembled from six acquired companies
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Onclusive onclusive was assembled from at least six acquired companies inside about a year, and users still encounter different interfaces, inconsistent data definitions and separate support paths depending on which module they are in, so training and internal reporting are harder than a single-product vendor.; Plausible there is no free tier, only a 30 day trial
- They diverge on capability: Onclusive covers Global media monitoring, Plausible covers Page view tracking.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Onclusive and Plausible actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Marketing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Onclusive
- Global media monitoring
- Broadcast monitoring
- Social listening
- Media contacts database
- Newsroom and press office
- Sentiment and tone analysis
- Share of voice reporting
- Crisis detection
Only in Plausible
- Page view tracking
- Goal tracking
- Real-time analytics
- Outbound link click tracking
- Privacy-focused
- No cookies
- Cloud deployment
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Onclusive
- A multinational communications team that needs print, broadcast and online coverage across twenty markets reported in one dashboard rather than through three regional vendorsnot Plausible
- A public affairs team that must evidence share of voice against named competitors for a quarterly board reportnot Plausible
- A PR agency running press office and media enquiry workflow for several client brands from one systemnot Plausible
- A corporate affairs function that needs early warning on a coverage spike outside its own time zone, with broadcast clips retrievable for legal reviewnot Plausible
Plausible
- Privacy-focused web analytics without cookies or personal datanot Onclusive
- A Google Analytics replacement that needs no consent bannernot Onclusive
- Self-hosted analytics on your own infrastructurenot Onclusive
- EU-hosted measurement for data residency requirementsnot Onclusive
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Onclusive
- Onclusive was assembled from at least six acquired companies inside about a year, and users still encounter different interfaces, inconsistent data definitions and separate support paths depending on which module they are in, so training and internal reporting are harder than a single-product vendor.
- Pricing is not published and is scoped by market coverage, source count and user seats, which makes competitive benchmarking difficult and means renewal increases are hard to challenge without a parallel quote from Cision or Meltwater.
- Broadcast monitoring coverage is uneven by country, so a global contract can look complete on paper while a specific market you care about has thin local radio or regional television coverage; verify your priority markets by name before signing.
- The company carries private-equity ownership and acquisition-related debt financing, which historically in this category has meant pressure on support headcount and above-inflation renewal pricing rather than product investment.
- Automated sentiment classification on news copy remains error-prone, especially for irony, quoted criticism and industry jargon, so teams reporting sentiment to executives generally need a human review step that erodes the labour saving the tool was bought for.
Plausible
- There is no free tier, only a 30 day trial
- Paid plans are metered on monthly pageviews, so a traffic spike moves you up a plan
- Self-hosting is possible but means running and updating the service yourself
- Deliberately simple, so there are no user-level profiles or funnel-by-individual reports the way a cookie-based analytics tool provides
Pricing, plan by plan
Onclusive
On request- Onclusive$undefined/year
- Global media monitoring
- Broadcast and print coverage
- Onclusive Social listening
Plausible
$9/month- Starter$9/month
- Up to 10k monthly pageviews
- 1 site
- 3 years data retention
- Growth$14/month
- Up to 3 sites
- Up to 3 team members
- Business$19/month
- Up to 10 sites
- Up to 10 team members
- 5 years data retention
- Enterprise$null/custom
- 10+ sites
- Custom pricing
Which should you pick?
Choose Onclusive if
- You need global media monitoring.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, API.
- You also want broadcast monitoring.
Questions people ask
- Is Onclusive or Plausible better?
- Neither clearly leads. Onclusive starts at On request and Plausible at $9/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Onclusive or Plausible?
- Onclusive starts at On request and Plausible at $9/month.
- Does Onclusive or Plausible run on more platforms?
- Onclusive runs on Web, iOS, Android, API. Plausible runs on Web.
- What is Onclusive best used for?
- Onclusive is most often used for a multinational communications team that needs print, broadcast and online coverage across twenty markets reported in one dashboard rather than through three regional vendors, a public affairs team that must evidence share of voice against named competitors for a quarterly board report, a pr agency running press office and media enquiry workflow for several client brands from one system, a corporate affairs function that needs early warning on a coverage spike outside its own time zone, with broadcast clips retrievable for legal review. Of those, a multinational communications team that needs print, broadcast and online coverage across twenty markets reported in one dashboard rather than through three regional vendors and a public affairs team that must evidence share of voice against named competitors for a quarterly board report are not what Plausible is typically brought in for.
- What can Onclusive do that Plausible cannot?
- Onclusive covers Global media monitoring, Broadcast monitoring, Social listening, Media contacts database. Plausible covers Page view tracking, Goal tracking, Real-time analytics, Outbound link click tracking.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Onclusive: Is Onclusive one product or several?
Several. It was formed from Kantar Reputation Intelligence, PRgloo and the original Onclusive in January 2022, then absorbed Critical Mention and Digimind later that year, and the modules retain distinguishable lineages.
Plausible: How much does Plausible Analytics cost?
Plausible offers plans starting at $9/month for the Starter tier, $14/month for Growth, and $19/month for Business. Enterprise pricing is custom. All plans include a 30-day free trial without requiring a credit card.
SourceOnclusive: Who owns it?
Symphony Technology Group, a US private equity firm, with debt financing on the Critical Mention acquisition from Stellus Capital Management.
Plausible: Is there a free version of Plausible?
Plausible does not offer a free plan; however, all paid plans include a 30-day free trial with full access to features.
SourceOnclusive: What happened to Digimind?
Digimind was acquired in July 2022 and rebranded as Onclusive Social in October 2022. If social listening is your main requirement, that is the platform you are evaluating.
Plausible: What is the difference between Plausible's pricing tiers?
The Starter plan covers up to 10k monthly pageviews for 1 site. Growth adds up to 3 sites and 3 team members. Business expands to 10 sites, 10 team members, and includes advanced features like API access and 5 years data retention.
SourceOnclusive: Does it publish pricing?
No. Contracts are annual and quoted according to markets monitored, sources covered and seat count.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Onclusive vs Roxhill
- Onclusive vs Northbeam
- Onclusive vs Buffer
- Onclusive vs Hootsuite
- Onclusive vs Bloomreach
- Onclusive vs Freshpaint
- Onclusive vs Umami
- Onclusive vs VWO
- Onclusive vs Moz
- Onclusive vs MoEngage
- Onclusive vs Zoho Marketing Automation
- Onclusive vs Adverity
- Onclusive vs Whatagraph
- Onclusive vs Optimizely
- Onclusive vs Vimeo
- Onclusive vs Attribution
- Onclusive vs Countly
- Onclusive vs Crazy Egg
- Onclusive vs Ruler Analytics
- Onclusive vs Simple Analytics
- Onclusive vs Fathom Analytics
- Onclusive vs Matomo
- Onclusive vs Mautic
- Onclusive vs Typeform
- Onclusive vs CleverTap
- Onclusive vs Convert
- Onclusive vs Datorama
- Onclusive vs Funnel.io
- Onclusive vs Google Optimize
- Plausible vs Roxhill
- Plausible vs Northbeam
- Plausible vs Buffer
- Plausible vs Hootsuite
- Plausible vs Bloomreach
- Plausible vs Freshpaint
- Plausible vs Umami
- Plausible vs VWO
- Plausible vs Moz
- Plausible vs MoEngage
- Plausible vs Zoho Marketing Automation
- Plausible vs Adverity
- Plausible vs Whatagraph
- Plausible vs Optimizely
- Plausible vs Vimeo
- Plausible vs Attribution
- Plausible vs Countly
- Plausible vs Crazy Egg
- Plausible vs Ruler Analytics
- Plausible vs Simple Analytics
- Plausible vs Fathom Analytics
- Plausible vs Matomo
- Plausible vs Mautic
- Plausible vs Typeform
- Plausible vs CleverTap
- Plausible vs Convert
- Plausible vs Datorama
- Plausible vs Funnel.io
- Plausible vs Google Optimize

