Marketing · head to head
Freshpaint vs Plausible

Freshpaint
Marketing
Privacy layer that lets healthcare organisations run marketing analytics without sending PHI
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Freshpaint filtering necessarily degrades what advertising platforms receive, so campaign optimisation and lookalike modelling perform worse than an unfiltered pixel would, and the marketing team must accept measurably weaker targeting as the price of compliance.; Plausible there is no free tier, only a 30 day trial
- They diverge on capability: Freshpaint covers PHI detection and redaction, Plausible covers Page view tracking.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Freshpaint and Plausible actually diverge.
| Attribute | Freshpaint | Plausible |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $9/month |
| Pricing model | quote | subscription |
| Founded | Unknown | 2018 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Marketing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Freshpaint
- PHI detection and redaction
- Business associate agreement
- Event verification
- Pixel replacement
- Consent governance
- Advertising destinations
- Analytics and session tools
- Audience activation
Only in Plausible
- Page view tracking
- Goal tracking
- Real-time analytics
- Outbound link click tracking
- Privacy-focused
- No cookies
- Cloud deployment
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Freshpaint
- A health system told by legal to remove its Meta and Google pixels that still needs to report cost per acquisition on service line campaignsnot Plausible
- A provider running paid search for elective procedures that must send conversion signals without disclosing which condition page a visitor viewednot Plausible
- A compliance officer who needs a field level record of exactly what patient related data leaves the website, for a privacy committeenot Plausible
- A multi-site provider group standardising tracking governance across marketing agencies that would otherwise each add their own tagsnot Plausible
Plausible
- Privacy-focused web analytics without cookies or personal datanot Freshpaint
- A Google Analytics replacement that needs no consent bannernot Freshpaint
- Self-hosted analytics on your own infrastructurenot Freshpaint
- EU-hosted measurement for data residency requirementsnot Freshpaint
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Freshpaint
- Filtering necessarily degrades what advertising platforms receive, so campaign optimisation and lookalike modelling perform worse than an unfiltered pixel would, and the marketing team must accept measurably weaker targeting as the price of compliance.
- Pricing is not published on the vendor site despite three named tiers, and third party reports of entry around 599 US dollars a month cover only the lowest tier, with audiences and advertising activation sitting above it.
- It addresses web and marketing tracking rather than the whole protected health information estate, so it solves one exposure while patient data in the CRM, call centre and email tooling remains a separate problem.
- The commercial case rests on a specific regulatory interpretation of online tracking technologies, and litigation and future guidance could narrow or widen it, which makes the size of the problem it solves less stable than a compliance purchase usually is.
- It is built for healthcare and priced accordingly, so an organisation wanting a general customer data platform pays for a regulatory specialism it does not need and gets narrower general purpose functionality than Segment or RudderStack.
Plausible
- There is no free tier, only a 30 day trial
- Paid plans are metered on monthly pageviews, so a traffic spike moves you up a plan
- Self-hosting is possible but means running and updating the service yourself
- Deliberately simple, so there are no user-level profiles or funnel-by-individual reports the way a cookie-based analytics tool provides
Pricing, plan by plan
Freshpaint
On request- Comply$undefined/month
- Governance and consent foundation
- PHI detection and redaction
- Web analytics, funnels and surveys
- Perform$undefined/month
- Everything in Comply
- Audiences and demand side platform activation
- Attribution, journeys and recommendations
- Scale$undefined/month
- Everything in Perform
- Ad performance reporting
- Full AI feature access
Plausible
$9/month- Starter$9/month
- Up to 10k monthly pageviews
- 1 site
- 3 years data retention
- Growth$14/month
- Up to 3 sites
- Up to 3 team members
- Business$19/month
- Up to 10 sites
- Up to 10 team members
- 5 years data retention
- Enterprise$null/custom
- 10+ sites
- Custom pricing
Which should you pick?
Choose Freshpaint if
- You need phi detection and redaction.
- You also want business associate agreement.
Questions people ask
- Is Freshpaint or Plausible better?
- Neither clearly leads. Freshpaint starts at On request and Plausible at $9/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Freshpaint or Plausible?
- Freshpaint starts at On request and Plausible at $9/month.
- Does Freshpaint or Plausible run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is Freshpaint best used for?
- Freshpaint is most often used for a health system told by legal to remove its meta and google pixels that still needs to report cost per acquisition on service line campaigns, a provider running paid search for elective procedures that must send conversion signals without disclosing which condition page a visitor viewed, a compliance officer who needs a field level record of exactly what patient related data leaves the website, for a privacy committee, a multi-site provider group standardising tracking governance across marketing agencies that would otherwise each add their own tags. Of those, a health system told by legal to remove its meta and google pixels that still needs to report cost per acquisition on service line campaigns and a provider running paid search for elective procedures that must send conversion signals without disclosing which condition page a visitor viewed are not what Plausible is typically brought in for.
- What can Freshpaint do that Plausible cannot?
- Freshpaint covers PHI detection and redaction, Business associate agreement, Event verification, Pixel replacement. Plausible covers Page view tracking, Goal tracking, Real-time analytics, Outbound link click tracking.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Freshpaint: Why can a hospital not just use Google Analytics?
US Department of Health and Human Services guidance treats IP addresses and health related page URLs as protected health information in this context, and advertising and analytics platforms will not sign a business associate agreement, so the disclosure is unlawful without an intermediary that filters.
Plausible: How much does Plausible Analytics cost?
Plausible offers plans starting at $9/month for the Starter tier, $14/month for Growth, and $19/month for Business. Enterprise pricing is custom. All plans include a 30-day free trial without requiring a credit card.
SourceFreshpaint: Does Freshpaint sign a BAA?
Yes, and it holds SOC 2 Type II. That is the central reason it exists, because the destination platforms will not.
Plausible: Is there a free version of Plausible?
Plausible does not offer a free plan; however, all paid plans include a 30-day free trial with full access to features.
SourceFreshpaint: What does it cost?
Freshpaint does not publish prices. Three tiers, Comply, Perform and Scale, are all sales led, and third party sources report entry around 599 US dollars a month for the lowest.
Plausible: What is the difference between Plausible's pricing tiers?
The Starter plan covers up to 10k monthly pageviews for 1 site. Growth adds up to 3 sites and 3 team members. Business expands to 10 sites, 10 team members, and includes advanced features like API access and 5 years data retention.
SourceFreshpaint: Will my ad performance suffer?
Somewhat. Stripping identifiers reduces what platforms can optimise against. The trade is weaker targeting in exchange for measurement that a compliance committee will approve.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Freshpaint vs Fathom Analytics
- Freshpaint vs Simple Analytics
- Freshpaint vs Google Analytics
- Freshpaint vs Umami
- Freshpaint vs Attribution
- Freshpaint vs Matomo
- Freshpaint vs Bloomreach
- Freshpaint vs Insider
- Freshpaint vs Invoca
- Freshpaint vs Madgicx
- Freshpaint vs Mautic
- Freshpaint vs Whatagraph
- Freshpaint vs MoEngage
- Freshpaint vs Optimizely
- Freshpaint vs Vimeo
- Freshpaint vs Countly
- Freshpaint vs Crazy Egg
- Freshpaint vs Ruler Analytics
- Freshpaint vs VWO
- Freshpaint vs Northbeam
- Freshpaint vs Typeform
- Freshpaint vs CleverTap
- Freshpaint vs Convert
- Freshpaint vs Datorama
- Freshpaint vs Funnel.io
- Freshpaint vs Google Optimize
- Plausible vs Fathom Analytics
- Plausible vs Simple Analytics
- Plausible vs Google Analytics
- Plausible vs Umami
- Plausible vs Attribution
- Plausible vs Matomo
- Plausible vs Bloomreach
- Plausible vs Insider
- Plausible vs Invoca
- Plausible vs Madgicx
- Plausible vs Mautic
- Plausible vs Whatagraph
- Plausible vs MoEngage
- Plausible vs Optimizely
- Plausible vs Vimeo
- Plausible vs Countly
- Plausible vs Crazy Egg
- Plausible vs Ruler Analytics
- Plausible vs VWO
- Plausible vs Northbeam
- Plausible vs Typeform
- Plausible vs CleverTap
- Plausible vs Convert
- Plausible vs Datorama
- Plausible vs Funnel.io
- Plausible vs Google Optimize

