Logging · head to head
Loki vs Sumo Logic
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Loki the Grafana Cloud free tier caps log ingestion at 50 GB a month with 14 day retention; Sumo Logic neither the Essentials nor the Enterprise Suite package lists a price on the pricing page; both link to Contact Sales
- They diverge on capability: Loki covers Label-based indexing, Sumo Logic covers Metrics collection.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Loki and Sumo Logic actually diverge.
| Attribute | Loki | Sumo Logic |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | open-source | usage-based |
| Founded | 2014 | 2010 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), platforms (Web, Api), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Logging).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Loki
- Label-based indexing
- Real-time log streaming
- LogQL query language
Only in Sumo Logic
- Metrics collection
- Real-time analytics
- Custom dashboards
Both cover
- Log aggregation
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Web support
- Api support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Loki
- Aggregating application and infrastructure logs with label based indexingnot Sumo Logic
- Querying logs alongside metrics in Grafananot Sumo Logic
Sumo Logic
- Cloud-native log analytics across applications and infrastructurenot Loki
- Running a SIEM with MITRE ATT&CK mapped detections and UEBAnot Loki
- Compliance and audit readiness reporting from log datanot Loki
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Loki
- The Grafana Cloud free tier caps log ingestion at 50 GB a month with 14 day retention
- Paid log pricing is split across three separate meters, at $0.050 per GB processed, $0.400 per GB written and $0.100 per GB retained
- Retaining logs is billed separately from ingesting them, so keeping data costs on an ongoing basis rather than once
- The Pro plan carries a $19 a month platform fee before any usage charges
Sumo Logic
- Neither the Essentials nor the Enterprise Suite package lists a price on the pricing page; both link to Contact Sales
- Quoted per GB figures assume an annual commitment, an average of 1 GB of log ingest per day and a US deployment region
- Pricing varies by the AWS deployment region chosen, so the same volume costs differently in Dublin, Frankfurt, Sydney or Tokyo
- Flex pricing bills per TB scanned rather than per GB ingested, so query activity drives the bill
- Feature activation is subject to minimum volume, minimum user counts and service requirements confirmed at the time of the transaction
- The API is limited to four calls per section, ten concurrent in-flight requests, and query processing times out after two minutes
- Self-serve credit card purchase is capped at $25,000; larger purchases must go through sales or a reseller
Pricing, plan by plan
Loki
Free- FreeFree
- Log aggregation
- Label-based indexing
- Real-time log streaming
Sumo Logic
Free- FreeFree
- Log aggregation
- Metrics collection
- Real-time analytics
Which should you pick?
Choose Loki if
- You need label-based indexing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want real-time log streaming.
Choose Sumo Logic if
- You need metrics collection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want real-time analytics.
Questions people ask
- Is Loki or Sumo Logic better?
- Neither clearly leads. Loki starts at Free and Sumo Logic at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Loki or Sumo Logic?
- Loki starts at Free and Sumo Logic at Free.
- Does Loki or Sumo Logic run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, Api, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Loki for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Loki best used for?
- Loki is most often used for aggregating application and infrastructure logs with label based indexing, querying logs alongside metrics in grafana. Of those, aggregating application and infrastructure logs with label based indexing and querying logs alongside metrics in grafana are not what Sumo Logic is typically brought in for.
- What can Loki do that Sumo Logic cannot?
- Loki covers Label-based indexing, Real-time log streaming, LogQL query language. Sumo Logic covers Metrics collection, Real-time analytics, Custom dashboards. Both handle Log aggregation, API, Webhooks, REST.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Loki: What does it cost to use Grafana Loki?
Loki is open source and free under the AGPLv3 license for self-hosted deployments. Grafana's managed Cloud Logs service includes a free tier up to 50GB of logs at no cost.
SourceSumo Logic: How much does Sumo Logic cost?
Sumo Logic does not publish specific pricing on its pricing page. Essentials plan is available via self-serve credit card for up to $25,000, with Enterprise Suite requiring sales contact for quotes.
SourceLoki: Are there paid options for Loki beyond the free tier?
Yes. Grafana Cloud Logs offers paid tiers for teams and enterprises, and Enterprise Logs provides self-managed options with expert support for organizations with data localization or privacy requirements.
SourceSumo Logic: How is Sumo Logic priced?
Sumo Logic uses a credit-based pricing model. Logs are measured by GB scanned during queries, metrics by Data Points per Minute, and traces up to 5GB per day on Essentials.
SourceLoki: What license does open source Loki use?
Loki is released under the AGPLv3 license, which requires you to share modifications and publish your source code if you deploy modifications publicly.
SourceSumo Logic: Is there a free trial?
Yes, Sumo Logic offers a 30-day free trial for the Essentials plan, which is available via self-serve credit card signup.
SourceSumo Logic: What are the data retention limits?
The Essentials plan supports up to 365 days of log retention, 300 log monitors, 500 metric monitors, and 5GB per day trace storage.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Loki vs Datadog Logs
- Loki vs Coralogix
- Loki vs Elastic Stack
- Loki vs New Relic
- Loki vs Dynatrace Logs
- Loki vs Graylog
- Loki vs Loggly
- Loki vs Mezmo
- Loki vs Retrace
- Loki vs Logz.io
- Loki vs Papertrail
- Loki vs Raygun
- Loki vs Elastic APM
- Loki vs New Relic Logs
- Loki vs Filebeat
- Loki vs Logstash
- Loki vs Splunk Cloud
- Loki vs Axiom
- Loki vs Fluentd
- Loki vs Humio
- Loki vs Airbrake
- Loki vs AppDynamics
- Loki vs Azure Monitor
- Loki vs Better Stack
- Loki vs ELK Stack
- Loki vs Dynatrace
- Sumo Logic vs Datadog Logs
- Sumo Logic vs Coralogix
- Sumo Logic vs Elastic Stack
- Sumo Logic vs New Relic
- Sumo Logic vs Dynatrace Logs
- Sumo Logic vs Graylog
- Sumo Logic vs Loggly
- Sumo Logic vs Mezmo
- Sumo Logic vs Retrace
- Sumo Logic vs Logz.io
- Sumo Logic vs Papertrail
- Sumo Logic vs Raygun
- Sumo Logic vs Elastic APM
- Sumo Logic vs New Relic Logs
- Sumo Logic vs Filebeat
- Sumo Logic vs Logstash
- Sumo Logic vs Splunk Cloud
- Sumo Logic vs Axiom
- Sumo Logic vs Fluentd
- Sumo Logic vs Humio
- Sumo Logic vs Airbrake
- Sumo Logic vs AppDynamics
- Sumo Logic vs Azure Monitor
- Sumo Logic vs Better Stack
- Sumo Logic vs ELK Stack
- Sumo Logic vs Dynatrace


