Backup · head to head
AvePoint Cloud Backup vs Kopia

AvePoint Cloud Backup
Backup
Microsoft 365, Dynamics and Salesforce backup from a long-standing Microsoft partner
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Kopia
Backup
Open source deduplicating backup with client side encryption and a repository on almost any storage
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Kopia has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: AvePoint Cloud Backup no pricing is published, so the per-user cost has to be established through sales, and it varies with data volume rather than being a flat seat rate.; Kopia space is only reclaimed when maintenance runs, and in a shared repository full maintenance is owned by one client, so if that machine goes away the repository grows for ever while every backup still reports success.
- They diverge on capability: AvePoint Cloud Backup covers Microsoft 365 backup, Kopia covers Content defined chunking.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which AvePoint Cloud Backup and Kopia actually diverge.
| Attribute | AvePoint Cloud Backup | Kopia |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | Open source, no licence fee |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web | Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Backup).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in AvePoint Cloud Backup
- Microsoft 365 backup
- Granular restore
- Entra ID backup
- Salesforce and Dynamics backup
- Bring your own storage
- Multiple daily backups
- Governance portfolio
Only in Kopia
- Content defined chunking
- Global deduplication
- Pack blobs
- Client side encryption
- Desktop and command line
- Repository verification
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
AvePoint Cloud Backup
- A tenant consolidation after an acquisition where backup, migration and governance are needed against the same Microsoft 365 estatenot Kopia
- An organisation that has discovered Microsoft 365 native retention does not restore a deleted SharePoint site after the recycle bin windownot Kopia
- Backing up Entra ID configuration so an accidental conditional access or group change can be reversednot Kopia
- A regulated organisation that must hold backup data in its own storage account under its own encryption keysnot Kopia
Kopia
- Backing up laptops and workstations to cheap object storage with a desktop interface rather than a cron jobnot AvePoint Cloud Backup
- Deduplicating backups of several similar machines into one repository so common content is stored oncenot AvePoint Cloud Backup
- Replacing a chunk based tool whose per object charges made a cheap bucket expensivenot AvePoint Cloud Backup
- Keeping an encrypted offsite copy where the storage provider must never be able to read the contentsnot AvePoint Cloud Backup
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
AvePoint Cloud Backup
- No pricing is published, so the per-user cost has to be established through sales, and it varies with data volume rather than being a flat seat rate.
- Whether AvePoint or your organisation holds the storage account and encryption keys is a configuration decision that is expensive to reverse later, and buyers often accept the vendor-managed default without considering it.
- Per-user pricing means organisations with many low-activity accounts, such as education institutions with dormant student mailboxes, pay for seats with almost no data.
- Restore of very large SharePoint sites and Teams structures is slow and API-throttled by Microsoft rather than by the product, so recovery time objectives set on paper often cannot be met in practice.
- The breadth of the AvePoint portfolio means sales conversations quickly widen into governance and migration products, and buyers who wanted only backup should expect to defend that scope.
Kopia
- Space is only reclaimed when maintenance runs, and in a shared repository full maintenance is owned by one client, so if that machine goes away the repository grows for ever while every backup still reports success.
- The repository format has changed across versions and mixing client versions against one repository is discouraged, so a fleet must be upgraded together rather than machine by machine.
- There is no central orchestration or reporting for many machines, so monitoring a fleet means building your own alerting around exit codes.
- Restoring many small files is slower than the backup was, because content must be reassembled from pack blobs, and this is rarely tested until the day it matters.
- Encryption is client side with no escrow, so a lost repository password means the data is unrecoverable and there is no vendor to appeal to.
Pricing, plan by plan
AvePoint Cloud Backup
On request- AvePoint Cloud Backup$undefined/year
- Priced per user, with variation by protected data volume
- AvePoint-managed or bring your own storage
- Microsoft 365, Entra ID, Dynamics, Salesforce and Google Workspace
Kopia
Free- KopiaFree
- Full functionality, no data limit
- Desktop application included
- Any supported storage back end
Which should you pick?
Choose AvePoint Cloud Backup if
- You need microsoft 365 backup.
- You also want granular restore.
Choose Kopia if
- You need content defined chunking.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker.
- You also want global deduplication.
Questions people ask
- Is AvePoint Cloud Backup or Kopia better?
- Neither clearly leads. AvePoint Cloud Backup starts at On request and Kopia at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, AvePoint Cloud Backup or Kopia?
- Kopia has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for AvePoint Cloud Backup and Free for Kopia.
- Does AvePoint Cloud Backup or Kopia run on more platforms?
- AvePoint Cloud Backup runs on Web. Kopia runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker.
- Can I use Kopia for free?
- Yes. Kopia has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. AvePoint Cloud Backup starts at On request.
- What is AvePoint Cloud Backup best used for?
- AvePoint Cloud Backup is most often used for a tenant consolidation after an acquisition where backup, migration and governance are needed against the same microsoft 365 estate, an organisation that has discovered microsoft 365 native retention does not restore a deleted sharepoint site after the recycle bin window, backing up entra id configuration so an accidental conditional access or group change can be reversed, a regulated organisation that must hold backup data in its own storage account under its own encryption keys. Of those, a tenant consolidation after an acquisition where backup, migration and governance are needed against the same microsoft 365 estate and an organisation that has discovered microsoft 365 native retention does not restore a deleted sharepoint site after the recycle bin window are not what Kopia is typically brought in for.
- What can AvePoint Cloud Backup do that Kopia cannot?
- AvePoint Cloud Backup covers Microsoft 365 backup, Granular restore, Entra ID backup, Salesforce and Dynamics backup. Kopia covers Content defined chunking, Global deduplication, Pack blobs, Client side encryption.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
AvePoint Cloud Backup: Can we keep backups in our own storage?
Yes, bring your own Azure or Amazon S3 storage is supported. Decide this before rollout, because moving to it afterwards is a migration.
Kopia: Is a partly corrupt repository still restorable?
Partly. Deduplication means one damaged pack blob affects every snapshot referencing its contents, but unaffected files still restore. Run verification regularly rather than assuming.
AvePoint Cloud Backup: Is Microsoft 365 native retention not enough?
No. Native retention covers deletion within limited windows and does not provide point-in-time restore of arbitrary items after those windows expire.
Kopia: How does it compare with restic?
Similar guarantees, with packing that behaves better on per operation billing, a desktop interface, and compression enabled by default.
AvePoint Cloud Backup: How is it priced?
Per user, varying by protected data volume, quoted rather than published. Ask for the volume assumption behind the per-user figure.
Kopia: Do I need to run maintenance manually?
It is scheduled automatically by default, but you must ensure the client that owns full maintenance keeps running, otherwise deleted snapshots never free space.
Kopia: Can several machines share one repository?
Yes, and that is where deduplication pays off, but they should run compatible versions and only one owns full maintenance.
Related pages
More on AvePoint Cloud Backup
Other head to heads
- AvePoint Cloud Backup vs Spanning Backup
- AvePoint Cloud Backup vs Backupify
- AvePoint Cloud Backup vs Druva Data Resiliency Cloud
- AvePoint Cloud Backup vs Keepit
- AvePoint Cloud Backup vs CloudAlly
- AvePoint Cloud Backup vs OwnBackup
- AvePoint Cloud Backup vs HYCU
- AvePoint Cloud Backup vs SysCloud
- AvePoint Cloud Backup vs Portworx Backup
- AvePoint Cloud Backup vs Rewind
- AvePoint Cloud Backup vs Velero
- AvePoint Cloud Backup vs CloudCasa
- AvePoint Cloud Backup vs Amanda Enterprise
- AvePoint Cloud Backup vs AOMEI Backupper
- AvePoint Cloud Backup vs Apple Time Machine
- AvePoint Cloud Backup vs Arcserve UDP
- AvePoint Cloud Backup vs Axcient x360Recover
- AvePoint Cloud Backup vs Bacula Enterprise
- AvePoint Cloud Backup vs rustic
- AvePoint Cloud Backup vs Borg Backup
- AvePoint Cloud Backup vs Duplicacy
- AvePoint Cloud Backup vs Restic
- AvePoint Cloud Backup vs Proxmox Backup Server
- AvePoint Cloud Backup vs UrBackup
- AvePoint Cloud Backup vs HPE StoreOnce
- AvePoint Cloud Backup vs Trilio
- AvePoint Cloud Backup vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- AvePoint Cloud Backup vs BDRShield
- AvePoint Cloud Backup vs Cohesity DataProtect
- AvePoint Cloud Backup vs Datto Backup
- AvePoint Cloud Backup vs MSP360 Backup
- Kopia vs Spanning Backup
- Kopia vs Backupify
- Kopia vs Druva Data Resiliency Cloud
- Kopia vs Keepit
- Kopia vs CloudAlly
- Kopia vs OwnBackup
- Kopia vs HYCU
- Kopia vs SysCloud
- Kopia vs Portworx Backup
- Kopia vs Rewind
- Kopia vs Velero
- Kopia vs CloudCasa
- Kopia vs Amanda Enterprise
- Kopia vs AOMEI Backupper
- Kopia vs Apple Time Machine
- Kopia vs Arcserve UDP
- Kopia vs Axcient x360Recover
- Kopia vs Bacula Enterprise
- Kopia vs rustic
- Kopia vs Borg Backup
- Kopia vs Duplicacy
- Kopia vs Restic
- Kopia vs Proxmox Backup Server
- Kopia vs UrBackup
- Kopia vs HPE StoreOnce
- Kopia vs Trilio
- Kopia vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Kopia vs BDRShield
- Kopia vs Cohesity DataProtect
- Kopia vs Datto Backup
- Kopia vs MSP360 Backup
