Backup · head to head
Keepit vs Kopia

Kopia
Backup
Open source deduplicating backup with client side encryption and a repository on almost any storage
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Kopia has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Keepit search functionality is very limited with restrictive search strings and poor filter options; Kopia space is only reclaimed when maintenance runs, and in a shared repository full maintenance is owned by one client, so if that machine goes away the repository grows for ever while every backup still reports success.
- They diverge on capability: Keepit covers Vendor-independent storage, Kopia covers Content defined chunking.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Keepit and Kopia actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Backup).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Keepit
- Vendor-independent storage
- Immutable backup
- Blockchain verification
- Unlimited retention
- Granular restore
- API access
- Microsoft 365
- Google Workspace
Only in Kopia
- Content defined chunking
- Global deduplication
- Pack blobs
- Client side encryption
- Desktop and command line
- Repository verification
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Keepit
- Data protectionnot Kopia
- Disaster recoverynot Kopia
- Business continuitynot Kopia
- Ransomware protectionnot Kopia
- Compliancenot Kopia
Kopia
- Backing up laptops and workstations to cheap object storage with a desktop interface rather than a cron jobnot Keepit
- Deduplicating backups of several similar machines into one repository so common content is stored oncenot Keepit
- Replacing a chunk based tool whose per object charges made a cheap bucket expensivenot Keepit
- Keeping an encrypted offsite copy where the storage provider must never be able to read the contentsnot Keepit
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Keepit
- Search functionality is very limited with restrictive search strings and poor filter options
- Download speeds during restoration are slow, particularly for mailbox restorations
- Console interface is complex and unintuitive, making file retrieval time-consuming
- Limited support for advanced features like Power Automate flows and manual backup job initiation
- Primarily targets SaaS applications and is not a single platform for on-premises workloads, VMs, or endpoint backup
Kopia
- Space is only reclaimed when maintenance runs, and in a shared repository full maintenance is owned by one client, so if that machine goes away the repository grows for ever while every backup still reports success.
- The repository format has changed across versions and mixing client versions against one repository is discouraged, so a fleet must be upgraded together rather than machine by machine.
- There is no central orchestration or reporting for many machines, so monitoring a fleet means building your own alerting around exit codes.
- Restoring many small files is slower than the backup was, because content must be reassembled from pack blobs, and this is rarely tested until the day it matters.
- Encryption is client side with no escrow, so a lost repository password means the data is unrecoverable and there is no vendor to appeal to.
Pricing, plan by plan
Keepit
$3/month- Keepit Business$3/month
- Immutable backup
- Unlimited retention
- Blockchain verification
Kopia
Free- KopiaFree
- Full functionality, no data limit
- Desktop application included
- Any supported storage back end
Which should you pick?
Choose Kopia if
- You need content defined chunking.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker.
- You also want global deduplication.
Questions people ask
- Is Keepit or Kopia better?
- Neither clearly leads. Keepit starts at $3/month and Kopia at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Keepit or Kopia?
- Kopia has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $3/month for Keepit and Free for Kopia.
- Does Keepit or Kopia run on more platforms?
- Keepit runs on Web. Kopia runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker.
- Can I use Kopia for free?
- Yes. Kopia has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Keepit starts at $3/month.
- What is Keepit best used for?
- Keepit is most often used for data protection, disaster recovery, business continuity, ransomware protection. Of those, data protection and disaster recovery are not what Kopia is typically brought in for.
- What can Keepit do that Kopia cannot?
- Keepit covers Vendor-independent storage, Immutable backup, Blockchain verification, Unlimited retention. Kopia covers Content defined chunking, Global deduplication, Pack blobs, Client side encryption.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Keepit: What SaaS applications does Keepit protect?
Keepit provides backup for Microsoft 365 workloads (Teams, Exchange, OneDrive, SharePoint, Groups, Public Folders), Microsoft Entra ID, Google, Salesforce, and 15 SaaS applications total as of 2026, with plans to add more.
SourceKopia: Is a partly corrupt repository still restorable?
Partly. Deduplication means one damaged pack blob affects every snapshot referencing its contents, but unaffected files still restore. Run verification regularly rather than assuming.
Keepit: How is Keepit priced?
Keepit uses custom pricing starting at $5 per seat monthly. Enterprise plans are custom quoted, with median annual contracts around $60,270. The pricing includes unlimited data storage.
SourceKopia: How does it compare with restic?
Similar guarantees, with packing that behaves better on per operation billing, a desktop interface, and compression enabled by default.
Keepit: Does Keepit guarantee immutability?
Yes, Keepit's architecture runs on secure, private infrastructure offering data immutability to prevent ransomware and accidental deletion.
SourceKopia: Do I need to run maintenance manually?
It is scheduled automatically by default, but you must ensure the client that owns full maintenance keeps running, otherwise deleted snapshots never free space.
Kopia: Can several machines share one repository?
Yes, and that is where deduplication pays off, but they should run compatible versions and only one owns full maintenance.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Keepit vs Spanning Backup
- Keepit vs CloudAlly
- Keepit vs Backupify
- Keepit vs Druva Data Resiliency Cloud
- Keepit vs Redstor
- Keepit vs AvePoint Cloud Backup
- Keepit vs SysCloud
- Keepit vs HYCU
- Keepit vs Rewind
- Keepit vs OwnBackup
- Keepit vs Velero
- Keepit vs MSP360 Backup
- Keepit vs AOMEI Backupper
- Keepit vs Apple Time Machine
- Keepit vs Arcserve UDP
- Keepit vs Axcient x360Recover
- Keepit vs Bacula Enterprise
- Keepit vs rustic
- Keepit vs Borg Backup
- Keepit vs Duplicacy
- Keepit vs Restic
- Keepit vs Proxmox Backup Server
- Keepit vs UrBackup
- Keepit vs HPE StoreOnce
- Keepit vs Portworx Backup
- Keepit vs Trilio
- Keepit vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Keepit vs BDRShield
- Keepit vs CloudCasa
- Keepit vs Cohesity DataProtect
- Keepit vs Datto Backup
- Kopia vs Spanning Backup
- Kopia vs CloudAlly
- Kopia vs Backupify
- Kopia vs Druva Data Resiliency Cloud
- Kopia vs Redstor
- Kopia vs AvePoint Cloud Backup
- Kopia vs SysCloud
- Kopia vs HYCU
- Kopia vs Rewind
- Kopia vs OwnBackup
- Kopia vs Velero
- Kopia vs MSP360 Backup
- Kopia vs AOMEI Backupper
- Kopia vs Apple Time Machine
- Kopia vs Arcserve UDP
- Kopia vs Axcient x360Recover
- Kopia vs Bacula Enterprise
- Kopia vs rustic
- Kopia vs Borg Backup
- Kopia vs Duplicacy
- Kopia vs Restic
- Kopia vs Proxmox Backup Server
- Kopia vs UrBackup
- Kopia vs HPE StoreOnce
- Kopia vs Portworx Backup
- Kopia vs Trilio
- Kopia vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Kopia vs BDRShield
- Kopia vs CloudCasa
- Kopia vs Cohesity DataProtect
- Kopia vs Datto Backup

