Backup · head to head
Acronis Cyber Protect vs Kopia

Acronis Cyber Protect
Backup
Integrated backup and cybersecurity protection
- From
- $68/year
- Rated
- -

Kopia
Backup
Open source deduplicating backup with client side encryption and a repository on almost any storage
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Kopia has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Acronis Cyber Protect technical support response is slow and inconsistent for resolving issues; Kopia space is only reclaimed when maintenance runs, and in a shared repository full maintenance is owned by one client, so if that machine goes away the repository grows for ever while every backup still reports success.
- They diverge on capability: Acronis Cyber Protect covers AI-based ransomware protection, Kopia covers Content defined chunking.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Acronis Cyber Protect and Kopia actually diverge.
| Attribute | Acronis Cyber Protect | Kopia |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $68/year | Free |
| Pricing model | Unknown | Open source, no licence fee |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Windows, Mac, Linux, Cloud, On-premises | Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker |
| Founded | 2003 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Backup).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Acronis Cyber Protect
- AI-based ransomware protection
- Continuous data protection
- Disk cloning
- Universal restore
- Backup validation
- Vulnerability assessments
- Microsoft 365
- Google Workspace
Only in Kopia
- Content defined chunking
- Global deduplication
- Pack blobs
- Client side encryption
- Desktop and command line
- Repository verification
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Acronis Cyber Protect
- Data protectionnot Kopia
- Disaster recoverynot Kopia
- Business continuitynot Kopia
- Ransomware protectionnot Kopia
- Compliancenot Kopia
Kopia
- Backing up laptops and workstations to cheap object storage with a desktop interface rather than a cron jobnot Acronis Cyber Protect
- Deduplicating backups of several similar machines into one repository so common content is stored oncenot Acronis Cyber Protect
- Replacing a chunk based tool whose per object charges made a cheap bucket expensivenot Acronis Cyber Protect
- Keeping an encrypted offsite copy where the storage provider must never be able to read the contentsnot Acronis Cyber Protect
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Acronis Cyber Protect
- Technical support response is slow and inconsistent for resolving issues
- UI performance is slow when handling operations like checking backup status or initiating restores
- Backup speed can be slow with limited replication options
- Complex pricing policies with multiple licensing models make cost prediction difficult
- Antivirus engine can significantly impact system performance on client machines
Kopia
- Space is only reclaimed when maintenance runs, and in a shared repository full maintenance is owned by one client, so if that machine goes away the repository grows for ever while every backup still reports success.
- The repository format has changed across versions and mixing client versions against one repository is discouraged, so a fleet must be upgraded together rather than machine by machine.
- There is no central orchestration or reporting for many machines, so monitoring a fleet means building your own alerting around exit codes.
- Restoring many small files is slower than the backup was, because content must be reassembled from pack blobs, and this is rarely tested until the day it matters.
- Encryption is client side with no escrow, so a lost repository password means the data is unrecoverable and there is no vendor to appeal to.
Pricing, plan by plan
Acronis Cyber Protect
$68/year- Standard$68/year
- Backup and recovery
- Basic security
- Advanced$129/year
- Enhanced security
- Ransomware protection
- Anti-malware
- Business$5.67/month
- Enterprise features
- Support
- Multiple workloads
Kopia
Free- KopiaFree
- Full functionality, no data limit
- Desktop application included
- Any supported storage back end
Which should you pick?
Choose Acronis Cyber Protect if
- You need ai-based ransomware protection.
- You work on Windows, Mac, Linux, Cloud, On-premises.
- You also want continuous data protection.
Choose Kopia if
- You need content defined chunking.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker.
- You also want global deduplication.
Questions people ask
- Is Acronis Cyber Protect or Kopia better?
- Neither clearly leads. Acronis Cyber Protect starts at $68/year and Kopia at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Acronis Cyber Protect or Kopia?
- Kopia has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $68/year for Acronis Cyber Protect and Free for Kopia.
- Does Acronis Cyber Protect or Kopia run on more platforms?
- Acronis Cyber Protect runs on Windows, Mac, Linux, Cloud, On-premises. Kopia runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker.
- Can I use Kopia for free?
- Yes. Kopia has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Acronis Cyber Protect starts at $68/year.
- What is Acronis Cyber Protect best used for?
- Acronis Cyber Protect is most often used for data protection, disaster recovery, business continuity, ransomware protection. Of those, data protection and disaster recovery are not what Kopia is typically brought in for.
- What can Acronis Cyber Protect do that Kopia cannot?
- Acronis Cyber Protect covers AI-based ransomware protection, Continuous data protection, Disk cloning, Universal restore. Kopia covers Content defined chunking, Global deduplication, Pack blobs, Client side encryption.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Acronis Cyber Protect: What does Acronis Cyber Protect include?
Acronis Cyber Protect combines backup, disaster recovery, next-generation anti-malware, cybersecurity, and endpoint management in a single platform for complete cyber resilience.
SourceKopia: Is a partly corrupt repository still restorable?
Partly. Deduplication means one damaged pack blob affects every snapshot referencing its contents, but unaffected files still restore. Run verification regularly rather than assuming.
Acronis Cyber Protect: What are the main pricing plans for Acronis Cyber Protect?
Acronis offers Cyber Protect Standard at $68/year, Cyber Protect Advanced at $129+/year for consumers, and business plans at $5.67-$8.60/month. Acronis runs three licensing models: per-workload, per-GB, and solution-based.
SourceKopia: How does it compare with restic?
Similar guarantees, with packing that behaves better on per operation billing, a desktop interface, and compression enabled by default.
Acronis Cyber Protect: Does Acronis offer an API for integrations?
Yes, Acronis exposes REST APIs allowing partners to integrate existing solutions and create new ones. They provide 300+ pre-built integrations and support both inbound (CyberApps) and outbound API integrations.
SourceKopia: Do I need to run maintenance manually?
It is scheduled automatically by default, but you must ensure the client that owns full maintenance keeps running, otherwise deleted snapshots never free space.
Acronis Cyber Protect: Can Acronis Cyber Protect be deployed on-premises?
Yes, Acronis Cyber Protect supports multiple deployment options including on-premises and SaaS, giving organizations flexibility in how they manage their backup and disaster recovery infrastructure.
SourceKopia: Can several machines share one repository?
Yes, and that is where deduplication pays off, but they should run compatible versions and only one owns full maintenance.
Related pages
More on Acronis Cyber Protect
Other head to heads
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs Cohesity
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs IBM Storage Protect
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs HPE StoreOnce
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs StorageCraft ShadowProtect
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs Spanning Backup
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs Borg Backup
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs Duplicacy
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs Restic
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs Altaro VM Backup
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs Bacula
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs Comet Backup
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs CloudCasa
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs Datto Backup
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs MSP360 Backup
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs Cohesity DataProtect
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs rustic
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs Proxmox Backup Server
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs UrBackup
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs Velero
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs Portworx Backup
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs Trilio
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs BDRShield
- Kopia vs Cohesity
- Kopia vs IBM Storage Protect
- Kopia vs HPE StoreOnce
- Kopia vs StorageCraft ShadowProtect
- Kopia vs Spanning Backup
- Kopia vs Borg Backup
- Kopia vs Duplicacy
- Kopia vs Restic
- Kopia vs Altaro VM Backup
- Kopia vs Bacula
- Kopia vs Comet Backup
- Kopia vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication
- Kopia vs CloudCasa
- Kopia vs Datto Backup
- Kopia vs MSP360 Backup
- Kopia vs Cohesity DataProtect
- Kopia vs rustic
- Kopia vs Proxmox Backup Server
- Kopia vs UrBackup
- Kopia vs Velero
- Kopia vs Portworx Backup
- Kopia vs Trilio
- Kopia vs BDRShield
