Softwr

Sales Enablement · head to head

Koncert vs Qwilr

Koncert logo

Koncert

Sales Enablement

Four separate diallers, including agent-assisted calling, for outbound teams that live on the phone

From
On request
Rated
-
Qwilr logo

Qwilr

Sales Enablement

Beautiful Proposals and Quotes

From
$35/month
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Koncert pricing is not published; the pricing page shows placeholder numbers rather than real rates and directs you to sales, which makes it impossible to compare cost per seat against Orum or Nooks without entering a sales cycle.; Qwilr growth plan requires a minimum of 5 users at $55/user/month and Scale requires a minimum of 10 users at $75/user/month, both billed annually only
  • They diverge on capability: Koncert covers AI Parallel Dialer, Qwilr covers Web-based proposals.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Koncert and Qwilr actually diverge.

Attributes where Koncert and Qwilr differ
AttributeKoncertQwilr
Starting priceOn request$35/month
Pricing modelquotesubscription
PlatformsWeb, APIWeb
FoundedUnknown2014

Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Sales Enablement).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Koncert

  • AI Parallel Dialer
  • AI Flow Dialer
  • Agent-Assisted Dialer
  • Click Dialer
  • Local presence
  • Caller ID health monitoring
  • Remote Coach
  • Remote Salesfloor

Only in Qwilr

  • Web-based proposals
  • Interactive quotes
  • E-signatures
  • Analytics
  • Video embedding
  • Salesforce
  • HubSpot
  • Slack

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Koncert

  • A sales development team selling into enterprises where decision makers sit behind switchboards and a software dialler alone cannot reach themnot Qwilr
  • An outbound organisation whose numbers are being flagged as spam and which needs caller ID health monitoring and rotation as a managed capabilitynot Qwilr
  • A distributed sales team that has lost the ambient pressure of a shared calling floor and wants Remote Salesfloor to recreate itnot Qwilr
  • A team that wants to run different dialler modes for different segments, parallel for volume lists and click-to-call for named accountsnot Qwilr

Qwilr

  • Sales teams sending interactive proposals with embedded payment collection who can commit to annual billingnot Koncert

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Koncert

  • Pricing is not published; the pricing page shows placeholder numbers rather than real rates and directs you to sales, which makes it impossible to compare cost per seat against Orum or Nooks without entering a sales cycle.
  • Parallel dialling connects representatives so fast that they arrive on a live call with no time to recall prior context, and reviewers report this pushes reps onto a rigid script and degrades conversation quality even as dial volume rises.
  • Koncert supplies TCPA-supporting features but not legal cover, and parallel and agent-assisted dialling attract regulatory attention in several jurisdictions, so the compliance burden and any liability stay with your organisation.
  • Selling four dialler products rather than one means the capability you evaluated may not be the one you bought, and switching modes or mixing them across a team frequently involves renegotiating the contract.
  • The agent-assisted dialler bills for human labour rather than software seats, so its cost scales with call volume rather than headcount and can rise sharply during a campaign push in a way a per-seat budget does not anticipate.

Qwilr

  • Growth plan requires a minimum of 5 users at $55/user/month and Scale requires a minimum of 10 users at $75/user/month, both billed annually only
  • Document automation beyond the free monthly allotment (10, 150 or 600 documents by tier) costs $5, $2.50 or $2.50 per additional document
  • QwilrPay charges a payment processing fee on top of the subscription, ranging from 0.25% on Starter down to 0.05% on Scale

Pricing, plan by plan

Koncert

On request
  • Koncert$undefined/year
    • AI Parallel Dialer
    • AI Flow Dialer
    • Agent-Assisted Dialer

Qwilr

$35/month
  • Starter$35/month
    • 1 user included
    • $49/month with monthly billing
    • $35/month with annual billing
  • Growth$55/month
    • Minimum 5 users required
    • $55/user/month (annual billing only)
    • 150 free documents included
  • Scale$75/month
    • Minimum 10 users required
    • $75/user/month (annual billing only)
    • 600 free documents included

Which should you pick?

Choose Koncert if

  • You need ai parallel dialer.
  • You work on Web, API.
  • You also want ai flow dialer.

Choose Qwilr if

  • You need web-based proposals.
  • You also want interactive quotes.

Questions people ask

Is Koncert or Qwilr better?
Neither clearly leads. Koncert starts at On request and Qwilr at $35/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Koncert or Qwilr?
Koncert starts at On request and Qwilr at $35/month.
Does Koncert or Qwilr run on more platforms?
Koncert runs on Web, API. Qwilr runs on Web.
What is Koncert best used for?
Koncert is most often used for a sales development team selling into enterprises where decision makers sit behind switchboards and a software dialler alone cannot reach them, an outbound organisation whose numbers are being flagged as spam and which needs caller id health monitoring and rotation as a managed capability, a distributed sales team that has lost the ambient pressure of a shared calling floor and wants remote salesfloor to recreate it, a team that wants to run different dialler modes for different segments, parallel for volume lists and click-to-call for named accounts. Of those, a sales development team selling into enterprises where decision makers sit behind switchboards and a software dialler alone cannot reach them and an outbound organisation whose numbers are being flagged as spam and which needs caller id health monitoring and rotation as a managed capability are not what Qwilr is typically brought in for.
What can Koncert do that Qwilr cannot?
Koncert covers AI Parallel Dialer, AI Flow Dialer, Agent-Assisted Dialer, Click Dialer. Qwilr covers Web-based proposals, Interactive quotes, E-signatures, Analytics.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Koncert: What is Koncert previously called?

ConnectLeader. The company rebranded to Koncert while retaining the same dialler technology lineage.

Qwilr: How much does Qwilr cost?

Qwilr Starter costs $35/user/month (annual) or $49/user/month (monthly). Growth plan is $55/user/month (annual only, 5-user minimum). Scale plan is $75/user/month (annual only, 10-user minimum). All prices in USD; AUD pricing available for Australia/New Zealand.

Source
Koncert: What is the agent-assisted dialler?

Human agents place calls and navigate gatekeepers, phone trees and receptionists, connecting your representative only when a live decision maker is on the line.

Qwilr: Does Qwilr offer a free trial?

Yes, Qwilr offers a 14-day free trial on the Starter plan. No credit card is required.

Source
Koncert: Is pricing published?

No. The pricing page shows placeholder figures and directs visitors to contact sales for a quote scoped by dialler type and seat count.

Qwilr: What are Qwilr document costs?

Starter plan includes 10 free documents monthly, then $5 per additional document. Growth plan includes 150 free documents and $2.50 per additional. Scale plan includes 600 free documents and $2.50 per additional. Volume discounts available from $1.50-$4 per document.

Source
Koncert: Is parallel dialling legally safe?

Koncert provides TCPA-supporting features and holds SOC 2 Type II and GDPR compliance, but the calling organisation remains responsible for regulatory compliance in each jurisdiction it dials into.

Share

Related pages

Other head to heads