Softwr

Sales Enablement · head to head

Arrows vs Qwilr

Arrows logo

Arrows

Sales Enablement

AI agents that run a deal playbook and keep quiet pipeline moving, integrated with HubSpot and Salesforce

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Qwilr logo

Qwilr

Sales Enablement

Beautiful Proposals and Quotes

From
$35/month
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Arrows the product has repositioned from HubSpot customer onboarding to AI-driven deal execution, so buyers acting on older recommendations may find the capability they were promised is no longer the focus of the roadmap.; Qwilr growth plan requires a minimum of 5 users at $55/user/month and Scale requires a minimum of 10 users at $75/user/month, both billed annually only
  • They diverge on capability: Arrows covers Deal gameplan, Qwilr covers Web-based proposals.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Arrows and Qwilr actually diverge.

Attributes where Arrows and Qwilr differ
AttributeArrowsQwilr
Starting priceOn request$35/month
Pricing modelquotesubscription
FoundedUnknown2014

Identical on both: free tier (No), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Sales Enablement).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Arrows

  • Deal gameplan
  • Playbook definition
  • Rep workspace
  • Follow-through automation
  • CRM write-back
  • Research and preparation
  • Stakeholder tracking
  • Shared customer plans

Only in Qwilr

  • Web-based proposals
  • Interactive quotes
  • E-signatures
  • Analytics
  • Video embedding
  • Salesforce
  • HubSpot
  • Slack

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Arrows

  • A HubSpot-centred sales team whose deal records go stale because reps update the CRM only when a manager asksnot Qwilr
  • A sales organisation where a consistent playbook exists on paper but nobody applies it below the top five deals in each pipelinenot Qwilr
  • A company where deals go quiet for weeks and nobody notices until the close date slips, wanting the follow-up to happen without a rep rememberingnot Qwilr
  • A revenue leader onboarding new account executives who need the playbook applied to their pipeline from day one rather than learned over two quartersnot Qwilr

Qwilr

  • Sales teams sending interactive proposals with embedded payment collection who can commit to annual billingnot Arrows

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Arrows

  • The product has repositioned from HubSpot customer onboarding to AI-driven deal execution, so buyers acting on older recommendations may find the capability they were promised is no longer the focus of the roadmap.
  • Pricing is not published and is scoped per engagement, so there is no benchmark, no self-serve entry, and two comparable buyers can be quoted materially different figures for the same product.
  • A scoping session is required before you get a number at all, which lengthens evaluation and makes it impossible to sanity-check budget before committing sales cycle time.
  • It depends on the CRM holding accurate deal and contact data; teams whose HubSpot or Salesforce hygiene is already poor get agents acting confidently on wrong information.
  • It is a small vendor in a category being entered by both CRM incumbents and well-funded agent startups, so betting a core sales workflow on it carries real continuity risk over a multi-year horizon.

Qwilr

  • Growth plan requires a minimum of 5 users at $55/user/month and Scale requires a minimum of 10 users at $75/user/month, both billed annually only
  • Document automation beyond the free monthly allotment (10, 150 or 600 documents by tier) costs $5, $2.50 or $2.50 per additional document
  • QwilrPay charges a payment processing fee on top of the subscription, ranging from 0.25% on Starter down to 0.05% on Scale

Pricing, plan by plan

Arrows

On request
  • Arrows$undefined/year
    • Deal gameplans and playbook execution
    • Rep workspace
    • Automated follow-through and CRM updates

Qwilr

$35/month
  • Starter$35/month
    • 1 user included
    • $49/month with monthly billing
    • $35/month with annual billing
  • Growth$55/month
    • Minimum 5 users required
    • $55/user/month (annual billing only)
    • 150 free documents included
  • Scale$75/month
    • Minimum 10 users required
    • $75/user/month (annual billing only)
    • 600 free documents included

Which should you pick?

Choose Arrows if

  • You need deal gameplan.
  • You also want playbook definition.
Arrows review

Choose Qwilr if

  • You need web-based proposals.
  • You also want interactive quotes.
Qwilr review

Questions people ask

Is Arrows or Qwilr better?
Neither clearly leads. Arrows starts at On request and Qwilr at $35/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Arrows or Qwilr?
Arrows starts at On request and Qwilr at $35/month.
Does Arrows or Qwilr run on more platforms?
Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
What is Arrows best used for?
Arrows is most often used for a hubspot-centred sales team whose deal records go stale because reps update the crm only when a manager asks, a sales organisation where a consistent playbook exists on paper but nobody applies it below the top five deals in each pipeline, a company where deals go quiet for weeks and nobody notices until the close date slips, wanting the follow-up to happen without a rep remembering, a revenue leader onboarding new account executives who need the playbook applied to their pipeline from day one rather than learned over two quarters. Of those, a hubspot-centred sales team whose deal records go stale because reps update the crm only when a manager asks and a sales organisation where a consistent playbook exists on paper but nobody applies it below the top five deals in each pipeline are not what Qwilr is typically brought in for.
What can Arrows do that Qwilr cannot?
Arrows covers Deal gameplan, Playbook definition, Rep workspace, Follow-through automation. Qwilr covers Web-based proposals, Interactive quotes, E-signatures, Analytics.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Arrows: Is Arrows still a customer onboarding tool?

It is now positioned around AI-driven deal execution rather than post-sale onboarding. Confirm with the vendor that the onboarding plans you want are still sold as you expect.

Qwilr: How much does Qwilr cost?

Qwilr Starter costs $35/user/month (annual) or $49/user/month (monthly). Growth plan is $55/user/month (annual only, 5-user minimum). Scale plan is $75/user/month (annual only, 10-user minimum). All prices in USD; AUD pricing available for Australia/New Zealand.

Source
Arrows: Do I need HubSpot?

HubSpot is the deepest integration and its historic home, but Salesforce is supported. It is a layer over a CRM, not a CRM replacement.

Qwilr: Does Qwilr offer a free trial?

Yes, Qwilr offers a 14-day free trial on the Starter plan. No credit card is required.

Source
Arrows: How is it priced?

By scope of work and deal coverage, not per seat. The vendor runs a scoping session before proposing a figure, and nothing is published.

Qwilr: What are Qwilr document costs?

Starter plan includes 10 free documents monthly, then $5 per additional document. Growth plan includes 150 free documents and $2.50 per additional. Scale plan includes 600 free documents and $2.50 per additional. Volume discounts available from $1.50-$4 per document.

Source
Arrows: Does it replace my CRM?

No. It writes back into HubSpot or Salesforce and gives reps a workspace so they spend less time in the CRM interface.

Share

Related pages

More on Arrows

More on Qwilr

Keep looking

Other head to heads