Maps · head to head
IndoorAtlas vs Webfleet

IndoorAtlas
Maps
Indoor positioning and navigation solutions using the Earth's magnetic field, WiFi, and Bluetooth beacons
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Webfleet
Fleet Management
European fleet telematics, owned by Bridgestone since the TomTom Telematics sale
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only IndoorAtlas has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: IndoorAtlas requires labor-intensive fingerprinting process, walking every corridor to build magnetic map for each venue; Webfleet ownership sits with a tyre manufacturer, so product investment follows the tyre and vehicle services strategy, and features that do not feed that business have historically moved slowly.
- They diverge on capability: IndoorAtlas covers Core Functionality, Webfleet covers Tachograph management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which IndoorAtlas and Webfleet actually diverge.
| Attribute | IndoorAtlas | Webfleet |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | freemium | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | iOS, Android, Web | Web, iOS, Android |
| Category | Maps | Fleet Management |
| Founded | 2012 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in IndoorAtlas
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
Only in Webfleet
- Tachograph management
- OptiDrive 360
- LINK devices
- PRO driver terminals
- Tyre and vehicle data
- Video telematics
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
IndoorAtlas
- Routing customers to deals in large retail spacesnot Webfleet
- Guiding visitors through shopping centers and airportsnot Webfleet
- Optimizing workplace space with movement analyticsnot Webfleet
- Tracking dwell times and visitor movement patternsnot Webfleet
Webfleet
- A haulage operator running heavy goods vehicles across EU borders that must download tachograph data remotely and prove driving-time compliancenot IndoorAtlas
- A European van fleet that wants driver coaching and fuel reporting without buying an American platform with unused compliance modulesnot IndoorAtlas
- An organisation already buying Bridgestone tyres and maintenance that can fold telematics into an existing service contractnot IndoorAtlas
- Fleets that want in-cab navigation and job dispatch on a dedicated driver terminal rather than a phone appnot IndoorAtlas
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
IndoorAtlas
- Requires labor-intensive fingerprinting process, walking every corridor to build magnetic map for each venue
- Magnetic signatures degrade over time, requiring periodic re-fingerprinting as the environment changes
- Magnetic interference from external sources and devices disrupts positioning accuracy
- Positioning inconsistent across different smartphone models due to magnetometer heterogeneity
- High cost to deploy and maintain, with expensive implementation for wide-scale adaptation
Webfleet
- Ownership sits with a tyre manufacturer, so product investment follows the tyre and vehicle services strategy, and features that do not feed that business have historically moved slowly.
- North American coverage is thin next to the European operation, with a smaller partner network and an hours of service product that is not competitive with purpose-built ELD vendors.
- Useful compliance capability sits in add-on tiers, so remote tachograph download and advanced reporting push the real per vehicle cost well above the entry quote.
- The camera line arrived later than the market and offers less on-device detection and less coaching workflow than Lytx or Samsara, so safety-driven buyers often end up running a second system.
- Contracts are hardware-led and usually multi-year, so replacing Webfleet means either running out the term or writing off installed devices that have no resale value.
Pricing, plan by plan
IndoorAtlas
Free- TrialFree
- 1 venue
- 10 end-users
- 14 days data retention
- Develop Lite$59/month
- 1 venue
- 20 end-users
- 30 days data retention
- Develop$400/month
- unlimited venues
- 50 end-users
- 1 hour monthly support
- Pro$349/month per venue
- unlimited venues and end-users
- supports up to 10,000 m² per venue
- basic technical support
Webfleet
On request- Webfleet$undefined/year
- Per vehicle subscription in feature tiers
- Hardware bought outright or amortised over the term
- Tachograph and remote download sold as add-ons
Which should you pick?
Choose IndoorAtlas if
- You need core functionality.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on iOS, Android, Web.
- You also want user interface.
Choose Webfleet if
- You need tachograph management.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want optidrive 360.
Questions people ask
- Is IndoorAtlas or Webfleet better?
- Neither clearly leads. IndoorAtlas starts at Free and Webfleet at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, IndoorAtlas or Webfleet?
- IndoorAtlas has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for IndoorAtlas and On request for Webfleet.
- Does IndoorAtlas or Webfleet run on more platforms?
- IndoorAtlas runs on iOS, Android, Web. Webfleet runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use IndoorAtlas for free?
- Yes. IndoorAtlas has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Webfleet starts at On request.
- What is IndoorAtlas best used for?
- IndoorAtlas is most often used for routing customers to deals in large retail spaces, guiding visitors through shopping centers and airports, optimizing workplace space with movement analytics, tracking dwell times and visitor movement patterns. Of those, routing customers to deals in large retail spaces and guiding visitors through shopping centers and airports are not what Webfleet is typically brought in for.
- What can IndoorAtlas do that Webfleet cannot?
- IndoorAtlas covers Core Functionality, User Interface. Webfleet covers Tachograph management, OptiDrive 360, LINK devices, PRO driver terminals.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
IndoorAtlas: How does IndoorAtlas determine positioning without beacons or hardware?
IndoorAtlas uses patented geomagnetic fusion technology that maps the Earth's magnetic field patterns inside buildings through a process called magnetic fingerprinting. The technology combines magnetometer data with other sensors like WiFi and Bluetooth for robust positioning.
SourceWebfleet: Is Webfleet still connected to TomTom?
No. TomTom sold the telematics business to Bridgestone in 2019. There is still navigation and mapping heritage in the driver terminals, but the owner and the strategy are Bridgestone.
IndoorAtlas: What is the initial setup process for IndoorAtlas?
Setup requires fingerprinting the venue by systematically walking through all corridors and spaces to build a magnetic map. The platform then identifies problematic areas through red (conflicting data), blue (insufficient coverage), and path orientation errors that require correction before the map is production-ready.
SourceWebfleet: Can it handle US ELD requirements?
There is an offering, but it is not the strength of the platform. A fleet whose main problem is US hours of service compliance should look at vendors built around that mandate.
IndoorAtlas: What are IndoorAtlas's pricing plans?
IndoorAtlas offers production subscriptions starting at 349 euros per month per venue, with a development plan at 400 euros per month. A free tier is available for developers to start building.
SourceWebfleet: Do I have to buy Bridgestone tyres to use it?
No. The tyre services integration is optional. It is worth pricing as a bundle if you already buy from Bridgestone, because that is where the discounting sits.
IndoorAtlas: How accurate is IndoorAtlas positioning?
IndoorAtlas claims industry-leading accuracy down to 50 centimeters using its 6-layer sensor fusion core across diverse environments, though accuracy varies based on building magnetic patterns and requires careful calibration.
SourceRelated pages
More on IndoorAtlas
Other head to heads
- IndoorAtlas vs Mappedin
- IndoorAtlas vs Esri ArcGIS
- IndoorAtlas vs CesiumJS
- IndoorAtlas vs SW Maps
- IndoorAtlas vs Felt
- IndoorAtlas vs Leica Infinity
- IndoorAtlas vs Navmii GPS
- IndoorAtlas vs Transit
- IndoorAtlas vs Mapbox
- IndoorAtlas vs Google Maps Platform
- IndoorAtlas vs LocationIQ
- IndoorAtlas vs Lonboard
- IndoorAtlas vs Mapillary
- IndoorAtlas vs MapQuest
- IndoorAtlas vs MAPS.ME
- IndoorAtlas vs Mapzen
- IndoorAtlas vs ArcGIS Survey123
- IndoorAtlas vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- IndoorAtlas vs Samsara
- IndoorAtlas vs Geotab
- IndoorAtlas vs Teletrac Navman
- IndoorAtlas vs Lytx
- IndoorAtlas vs Motive
- IndoorAtlas vs Fleet Complete
- IndoorAtlas vs Uptake
- IndoorAtlas vs AssetWorks
- IndoorAtlas vs Omnitracs
- IndoorAtlas vs Chevin FleetWave
- IndoorAtlas vs CalAmp
- IndoorAtlas vs Whip Around
- IndoorAtlas vs Ridecell
- IndoorAtlas vs Zonar Systems
- IndoorAtlas vs NexTraq
- Webfleet vs Mappedin
- Webfleet vs Esri ArcGIS
- Webfleet vs CesiumJS
- Webfleet vs SW Maps
- Webfleet vs Felt
- Webfleet vs Leica Infinity
- Webfleet vs Navmii GPS
- Webfleet vs Transit
- Webfleet vs Mapbox
- Webfleet vs Google Maps Platform
- Webfleet vs LocationIQ
- Webfleet vs Lonboard
- Webfleet vs Mapillary
- Webfleet vs MapQuest
- Webfleet vs MAPS.ME
- Webfleet vs Mapzen
- Webfleet vs ArcGIS Survey123
- Webfleet vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- Webfleet vs Samsara
- Webfleet vs Geotab
- Webfleet vs Teletrac Navman
- Webfleet vs Lytx
- Webfleet vs Motive
- Webfleet vs Fleet Complete
- Webfleet vs Uptake
- Webfleet vs AssetWorks
- Webfleet vs Omnitracs
- Webfleet vs Chevin FleetWave
- Webfleet vs CalAmp
- Webfleet vs Whip Around
- Webfleet vs Ridecell
- Webfleet vs Zonar Systems
- Webfleet vs NexTraq
