Maps · head to head
Felt vs IndoorAtlas

Felt
Maps
Collaborative browser mapping with a free non-commercial tier and annual-only paid contracts
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

IndoorAtlas
Maps
Indoor positioning and navigation solutions using the Earth's magnetic field, WiFi, and Bluetooth beacons
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Felt felt publishes no prices for Professional or Enterprise, so buyers cannot compare against ArcGIS Online or QGIS with hosting without entering a sales process; IndoorAtlas requires labor-intensive fingerprinting process, walking every corridor to build magnetic map for each venue
- They diverge on capability: Felt covers Real-time collaboration, IndoorAtlas covers Core Functionality.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Felt and IndoorAtlas actually diverge.
| Attribute | Felt | IndoorAtlas |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | quote | freemium |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | iOS, Android, Web |
| Founded | Unknown | 2012 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Felt
- Real-time collaboration
- Drag and drop data
- Unlimited viewers
- Field app with offline support
- Dashboards
- Live cloud sources
- API and SDK
Only in IndoorAtlas
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Felt
- An environmental consultancy that needs a client to view and comment on survey results without installing GIS softwarenot IndoorAtlas
- A utility field crew collecting asset condition offline and syncing to the same map the office is looking atnot IndoorAtlas
- A planning department sharing a proposal map with the public where the viewer count is unpredictable and viewer seats would be uncostednot IndoorAtlas
- A team of analysts who each hold data in different formats and want one map assembled in an afternoon rather than a weeknot IndoorAtlas
IndoorAtlas
- Routing customers to deals in large retail spacesnot Felt
- Guiding visitors through shopping centers and airportsnot Felt
- Optimizing workplace space with movement analyticsnot Felt
- Tracking dwell times and visitor movement patternsnot Felt
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Felt
- Felt publishes no prices for Professional or Enterprise, so buyers cannot compare against ArcGIS Online or QGIS with hosting without entering a sales process
- Paid tiers are annual contract only with no monthly option, which excludes consultancies that need a tool for a single short engagement and forces them to the free non-commercial tier they are not licensed to use for client work
- The API, JavaScript SDK and live warehouse connections are enterprise-only, so a mid-sized team that wants programmatic access has to buy the top tier rather than pay for one capability
- Analytical depth is limited: there is no meaningful geoprocessing, topology checking or model building, so Felt sits beside a real GIS rather than replacing one
- The Professional tier caps data processing at 25 GB a month and map views at 100,000 a month, which are easy to exceed with raster imagery or a public-facing map, and the overage terms are not published either
IndoorAtlas
- Requires labor-intensive fingerprinting process, walking every corridor to build magnetic map for each venue
- Magnetic signatures degrade over time, requiring periodic re-fingerprinting as the environment changes
- Magnetic interference from external sources and devices disrupts positioning accuracy
- Positioning inconsistent across different smartphone models due to magnetometer heterogeneity
- High cost to deploy and maintain, with expensive implementation for wide-scale adaptation
Pricing, plan by plan
Felt
Free- PersonalFree
- Free forever for non-commercial mapping
- Map creation, upload and sharing
- Not licensed for commercial use
- Professional$undefined/year
- 10 full-access seats with unlimited viewers
- 25 GB of data processing per month
- 100,000 map views per month
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Live cloud sources including Postgres, Snowflake, BigQuery, Databricks and S3
- REST API and JavaScript SDK
- AI features
IndoorAtlas
Free- TrialFree
- 1 venue
- 10 end-users
- 14 days data retention
- Develop Lite$59/month
- 1 venue
- 20 end-users
- 30 days data retention
- Develop$400/month
- unlimited venues
- 50 end-users
- 1 hour monthly support
- Pro$349/month per venue
- unlimited venues and end-users
- supports up to 10,000 m² per venue
- basic technical support
Which should you pick?
Choose Felt if
- You need real-time collaboration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want drag and drop data.
Choose IndoorAtlas if
- You need core functionality.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on iOS, Android, Web.
- You also want user interface.
Questions people ask
- Is Felt or IndoorAtlas better?
- Neither clearly leads. Felt starts at Free and IndoorAtlas at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Felt or IndoorAtlas?
- Felt starts at Free and IndoorAtlas at Free.
- Does Felt or IndoorAtlas run on more platforms?
- Felt runs on Web, iOS, Android. IndoorAtlas runs on iOS, Android, Web.
- Can I use Felt for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Felt best used for?
- Felt is most often used for an environmental consultancy that needs a client to view and comment on survey results without installing gis software, a utility field crew collecting asset condition offline and syncing to the same map the office is looking at, a planning department sharing a proposal map with the public where the viewer count is unpredictable and viewer seats would be uncosted, a team of analysts who each hold data in different formats and want one map assembled in an afternoon rather than a week. Of those, an environmental consultancy that needs a client to view and comment on survey results without installing gis software and a utility field crew collecting asset condition offline and syncing to the same map the office is looking at are not what IndoorAtlas is typically brought in for.
- What can Felt do that IndoorAtlas cannot?
- Felt covers Real-time collaboration, Drag and drop data, Unlimited viewers, Field app with offline support. IndoorAtlas covers Core Functionality, User Interface.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Felt: What does Felt cost?
Felt does not publish prices for Professional or Enterprise. Personal is free but licensed for non-commercial use only.
IndoorAtlas: How does IndoorAtlas determine positioning without beacons or hardware?
IndoorAtlas uses patented geomagnetic fusion technology that maps the Earth's magnetic field patterns inside buildings through a process called magnetic fingerprinting. The technology combines magnetometer data with other sensors like WiFi and Bluetooth for robust positioning.
SourceFelt: Can I pay monthly?
No. Paid plans are annual contracts. There is a 7 day trial of Professional.
IndoorAtlas: What is the initial setup process for IndoorAtlas?
Setup requires fingerprinting the venue by systematically walking through all corridors and spaces to build a magnetic map. The platform then identifies problematic areas through red (conflicting data), blue (insufficient coverage), and path orientation errors that require correction before the map is production-ready.
SourceFelt: Do viewers cost anything?
No. Viewer access is unlimited on the paid plans, which is the main reason organisations with large map audiences choose it.
IndoorAtlas: What are IndoorAtlas's pricing plans?
IndoorAtlas offers production subscriptions starting at 349 euros per month per venue, with a development plan at 400 euros per month. A free tier is available for developers to start building.
SourceFelt: Is there a nonprofit discount?
Yes, 30 per cent for verified United States nonprofits, and free access for verified students and classrooms.
IndoorAtlas: How accurate is IndoorAtlas positioning?
IndoorAtlas claims industry-leading accuracy down to 50 centimeters using its 6-layer sensor fusion core across diverse environments, though accuracy varies based on building magnetic patterns and requires careful calibration.
SourceRelated pages
More on IndoorAtlas
Other head to heads
- Felt vs Esri ArcGIS
- Felt vs CARTO
- Felt vs QGIS
- Felt vs Atlas.co
- Felt vs Global Mapper
- Felt vs GRASS GIS
- Felt vs onX Maps
- Felt vs Ride with GPS
- Felt vs SW Maps
- Felt vs TomTom Developer Portal
- Felt vs Kepler.gl
- Felt vs Trailforks
- Felt vs AllTrails
- Felt vs Bing Maps
- Felt vs Cesium ion
- Felt vs Citymapper
- Felt vs ArcGIS Survey123
- Felt vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- Felt vs Mappedin
- Felt vs CesiumJS
- Felt vs Leica Infinity
- Felt vs Navmii GPS
- Felt vs Transit
- Felt vs Mapbox
- Felt vs Google Maps Platform
- Felt vs LocationIQ
- Felt vs Lonboard
- Felt vs Mapillary
- Felt vs MapQuest
- Felt vs MAPS.ME
- Felt vs Mapzen
- IndoorAtlas vs Esri ArcGIS
- IndoorAtlas vs CARTO
- IndoorAtlas vs QGIS
- IndoorAtlas vs Atlas.co
- IndoorAtlas vs Global Mapper
- IndoorAtlas vs GRASS GIS
- IndoorAtlas vs onX Maps
- IndoorAtlas vs Ride with GPS
- IndoorAtlas vs SW Maps
- IndoorAtlas vs TomTom Developer Portal
- IndoorAtlas vs Kepler.gl
- IndoorAtlas vs Trailforks
- IndoorAtlas vs AllTrails
- IndoorAtlas vs Bing Maps
- IndoorAtlas vs Cesium ion
- IndoorAtlas vs Citymapper
- IndoorAtlas vs ArcGIS Survey123
- IndoorAtlas vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- IndoorAtlas vs Mappedin
- IndoorAtlas vs CesiumJS
- IndoorAtlas vs Leica Infinity
- IndoorAtlas vs Navmii GPS
- IndoorAtlas vs Transit
- IndoorAtlas vs Mapbox
- IndoorAtlas vs Google Maps Platform
- IndoorAtlas vs LocationIQ
- IndoorAtlas vs Lonboard
- IndoorAtlas vs Mapillary
- IndoorAtlas vs MapQuest
- IndoorAtlas vs MAPS.ME
- IndoorAtlas vs Mapzen
