Maps · head to head
IndoorAtlas vs SW Maps

IndoorAtlas
Maps
Indoor positioning and navigation solutions using the Earth's magnetic field, WiFi, and Bluetooth beacons
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

SW Maps
Maps
Free Android GIS data collector that pairs with external RTK GNSS receivers
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: IndoorAtlas requires labor-intensive fingerprinting process, walking every corridor to build magnetic map for each venue; SW Maps android only. There is no iOS version and no sign of one, which rules it out for organisations that issue iPhones and iPads to field staff.
- They diverge on capability: IndoorAtlas covers Core Functionality, SW Maps covers Custom feature layers.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which IndoorAtlas and SW Maps actually diverge.
| Attribute | IndoorAtlas | SW Maps |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | iOS, Android, Web | Android |
| Founded | 2012 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in IndoorAtlas
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
Only in SW Maps
- Custom feature layers
- External GNSS support
- Offline basemaps
- Geospatial PDF layers
- Vector import
- Photo and media capture
- Export formats
- NTRIP client
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
IndoorAtlas
- Routing customers to deals in large retail spacesnot SW Maps
- Guiding visitors through shopping centers and airportsnot SW Maps
- Optimizing workplace space with movement analyticsnot SW Maps
- Tracking dwell times and visitor movement patternsnot SW Maps
SW Maps
- An NGO or municipal utility mapping water points, pipe networks or road assets on a budget that cannot absorb per-user GIS subscriptionsnot IndoorAtlas
- A survey team pairing a low-cost RTK receiver with Android tablets to collect centimetre-accurate attributed features without buying field software seatsnot IndoorAtlas
- A university field course teaching GNSS data collection where every student needs the tool on their own devicenot IndoorAtlas
- A consultant doing a one-off asset inventory who needs shapefile or GeoPackage output and does not want to start an annual subscription for a three-week jobnot IndoorAtlas
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
IndoorAtlas
- Requires labor-intensive fingerprinting process, walking every corridor to build magnetic map for each venue
- Magnetic signatures degrade over time, requiring periodic re-fingerprinting as the environment changes
- Magnetic interference from external sources and devices disrupts positioning accuracy
- Positioning inconsistent across different smartphone models due to magnetometer heterogeneity
- High cost to deploy and maintain, with expensive implementation for wide-scale adaptation
SW Maps
- Android only. There is no iOS version and no sign of one, which rules it out for organisations that issue iPhones and iPads to field staff.
- There is no back end: no user management, no central project sync, no audit trail. Data lives on the device until someone exports it, and a lost tablet is lost data.
- No commercial support contract exists, so an organisation with a compliance requirement for vendor support cannot use it for regulated work regardless of technical fit.
- It is maintained by a small consultancy as a side product of its own project work, so the roadmap follows Softwel’s needs and a feature you depend on may never be prioritised.
- Form logic is basic compared with dedicated survey platforms: no meaningful skip logic, validation or multi-user assignment, so complex questionnaires quickly outgrow it.
Pricing, plan by plan
IndoorAtlas
Free- TrialFree
- 1 venue
- 10 end-users
- 14 days data retention
- Develop Lite$59/month
- 1 venue
- 20 end-users
- 30 days data retention
- Develop$400/month
- unlimited venues
- 50 end-users
- 1 hour monthly support
- Pro$349/month per venue
- unlimited venues and end-users
- supports up to 10,000 m² per venue
- basic technical support
SW Maps
Free- SW MapsFree
- All features included
- External RTK GNSS support
- Unlimited layers and exports
Which should you pick?
Choose IndoorAtlas if
- You need core functionality.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on iOS, Android, Web.
- You also want user interface.
Choose SW Maps if
- You need custom feature layers.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Android.
- You also want external gnss support.
Questions people ask
- Is IndoorAtlas or SW Maps better?
- Neither clearly leads. IndoorAtlas starts at Free and SW Maps at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, IndoorAtlas or SW Maps?
- IndoorAtlas starts at Free and SW Maps at Free.
- Does IndoorAtlas or SW Maps run on more platforms?
- IndoorAtlas runs on iOS, Android, Web. SW Maps runs on Android.
- Can I use IndoorAtlas for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is IndoorAtlas best used for?
- IndoorAtlas is most often used for routing customers to deals in large retail spaces, guiding visitors through shopping centers and airports, optimizing workplace space with movement analytics, tracking dwell times and visitor movement patterns. Of those, routing customers to deals in large retail spaces and guiding visitors through shopping centers and airports are not what SW Maps is typically brought in for.
- What can IndoorAtlas do that SW Maps cannot?
- IndoorAtlas covers Core Functionality, User Interface. SW Maps covers Custom feature layers, External GNSS support, Offline basemaps, Geospatial PDF layers.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
IndoorAtlas: How does IndoorAtlas determine positioning without beacons or hardware?
IndoorAtlas uses patented geomagnetic fusion technology that maps the Earth's magnetic field patterns inside buildings through a process called magnetic fingerprinting. The technology combines magnetometer data with other sensors like WiFi and Bluetooth for robust positioning.
SourceSW Maps: Is SW Maps really free?
Yes. It is free with no advertising and no paid tier. There is no subscription and no feature paywall.
IndoorAtlas: What is the initial setup process for IndoorAtlas?
Setup requires fingerprinting the venue by systematically walking through all corridors and spaces to build a magnetic map. The platform then identifies problematic areas through red (conflicting data), blue (insufficient coverage), and path orientation errors that require correction before the map is production-ready.
SourceSW Maps: Does it support RTK receivers?
Yes, over Bluetooth or USB serial, with NTRIP correction support, antenna height and per-point fix quality recording.
IndoorAtlas: What are IndoorAtlas's pricing plans?
IndoorAtlas offers production subscriptions starting at 349 euros per month per venue, with a development plan at 400 euros per month. A free tier is available for developers to start building.
SourceSW Maps: Is there an iOS version?
No. Android only.
IndoorAtlas: How accurate is IndoorAtlas positioning?
IndoorAtlas claims industry-leading accuracy down to 50 centimeters using its 6-layer sensor fusion core across diverse environments, though accuracy varies based on building magnetic patterns and requires careful calibration.
SourceSW Maps: Who maintains it?
Softwel, an engineering consultancy in Kathmandu, Nepal, which built it for its own infrastructure projects.
SW Maps: Can we get support?
Not contractually. There is no commercial support agreement, which is the main reason organisations with compliance obligations choose a paid alternative.
Related pages
More on IndoorAtlas
Other head to heads
- IndoorAtlas vs Mappedin
- IndoorAtlas vs Esri ArcGIS
- IndoorAtlas vs CesiumJS
- IndoorAtlas vs Felt
- IndoorAtlas vs Leica Infinity
- IndoorAtlas vs Navmii GPS
- IndoorAtlas vs Transit
- IndoorAtlas vs Mapbox
- IndoorAtlas vs Google Maps Platform
- IndoorAtlas vs LocationIQ
- IndoorAtlas vs Lonboard
- IndoorAtlas vs Mapillary
- IndoorAtlas vs MapQuest
- IndoorAtlas vs MAPS.ME
- IndoorAtlas vs Mapzen
- IndoorAtlas vs ArcGIS Survey123
- IndoorAtlas vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- IndoorAtlas vs QGIS
- IndoorAtlas vs Emlid Studio
- IndoorAtlas vs onX Maps
- IndoorAtlas vs Agisoft Metashape
- IndoorAtlas vs Gaia GPS
- IndoorAtlas vs GraphHopper
- IndoorAtlas vs GRASS GIS
- IndoorAtlas vs HERE WeGo
- SW Maps vs Mappedin
- SW Maps vs Esri ArcGIS
- SW Maps vs CesiumJS
- SW Maps vs Felt
- SW Maps vs Leica Infinity
- SW Maps vs Navmii GPS
- SW Maps vs Transit
- SW Maps vs Mapbox
- SW Maps vs Google Maps Platform
- SW Maps vs LocationIQ
- SW Maps vs Lonboard
- SW Maps vs Mapillary
- SW Maps vs MapQuest
- SW Maps vs MAPS.ME
- SW Maps vs Mapzen
- SW Maps vs ArcGIS Survey123
- SW Maps vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- SW Maps vs QGIS
- SW Maps vs Emlid Studio
- SW Maps vs onX Maps
- SW Maps vs Agisoft Metashape
- SW Maps vs Gaia GPS
- SW Maps vs GraphHopper
- SW Maps vs GRASS GIS
- SW Maps vs HERE WeGo
