Cybersecurity · head to head
IBM QRadar vs OnBase

IBM QRadar
Cybersecurity
Enterprise SIEM licensed by events per second, whose cloud business IBM sold to Palo Alto Networks in 2024.
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Each has a real cost: IBM QRadar iBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.; OnBase pricing starts at 2,000 USD per month, making it expensive for small agencies
- They diverge on capability: IBM QRadar covers Offence model, OnBase covers Content Management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which IBM QRadar and OnBase actually diverge.
| Attribute | IBM QRadar | OnBase |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $400/month |
| Platforms | Web, Api | Web, Mobile |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Government |
| Founded | 1911 | 1991 |
Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in IBM QRadar
- Offence model
- Network flow analysis
- Device Support Modules
- Ariel query language
- Rules and building blocks
- Deployment topology
- App Exchange
- Use Case Manager
Only in OnBase
- Content Management
- Workflow Automation
- Case Management
- Records Management
- Intelligent Capture
- Microsoft 365
- Salesforce
- Epic
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
IBM QRadar
- A regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared SaaS SIEMnot OnBase
- A SOC that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an NDR product separatelynot OnBase
- An existing QRadar estate deciding whether to stay on premises or accept the migration path to a different vendor's platformnot OnBase
- Compliance-driven log retention and reporting where the audit requirement is specific about collection, retention and reportingnot OnBase
OnBase
- Citizen Servicesnot IBM QRadar
- Records Managementnot IBM QRadar
- Public Safetynot IBM QRadar
- Civic Engagementnot IBM QRadar
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
IBM QRadar
- IBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.
- Licensing is by events per second and flows per minute, so every additional log source raises the cost directly and teams routinely exclude verbose sources such as DNS, proxy, endpoint and cloud audit logs to stay under the licence, which strips out exactly the data an investigation later needs.
- It needs a dedicated operator: rule tuning, parser work and offence triage are continuous jobs, and an organisation that deploys QRadar without at least one named engineer accumulates thousands of unreviewed offences and a false sense of coverage.
- A log source without a matching Device Support Module arrives unparsed, and writing a custom parser with regular expressions against an unfamiliar payload format is specialist work that can take days per source, which quietly determines which systems ever get monitored.
- On-premises capacity is planned across consoles, processors, collectors and data nodes, so outgrowing the sizing means procuring and racking more appliances rather than changing a subscription tier, and growth becomes a purchasing cycle measured in months.
OnBase
- Pricing starts at 2,000 USD per month, making it expensive for small agencies
- Complex implementation and configuration required for government-specific workflows
- Requires significant IT resources for deployment and ongoing management
Pricing, plan by plan
IBM QRadar
On request- QRadar SIEMFree
- Event and flow processing
- Offense management
- Threat intelligence
- QRadar CloudFree
- Cloud-native deployment
- Elastic scaling
- Managed infrastructure
- QRadar SuiteFree
- SIEM + SOAR + XDR
- Unified analyst experience
- Federated search
OnBase
$400/month- Government$400/month
- Content Management
- Process Automation
- Case Management
Which should you pick?
Choose IBM QRadar if
- You need offence model.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want network flow analysis.
Choose OnBase if
- You need content management.
- You work on Web, Mobile.
- You also want workflow automation.
Questions people ask
- Is IBM QRadar or OnBase better?
- Neither clearly leads. IBM QRadar starts at On request and OnBase at $400/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, IBM QRadar or OnBase?
- IBM QRadar starts at On request and OnBase at $400/month.
- Does IBM QRadar or OnBase run on more platforms?
- IBM QRadar runs on Web, Api. OnBase runs on Web, Mobile.
- What is IBM QRadar best used for?
- IBM QRadar is most often used for a regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared saas siem, a soc that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an ndr product separately, an existing qradar estate deciding whether to stay on premises or accept the migration path to a different vendor's platform, compliance-driven log retention and reporting where the audit requirement is specific about collection, retention and reporting. Of those, a regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared saas siem and a soc that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an ndr product separately are not what OnBase is typically brought in for.
- What can IBM QRadar do that OnBase cannot?
- IBM QRadar covers Offence model, Network flow analysis, Device Support Modules, Ariel query language. OnBase covers Content Management, Workflow Automation, Case Management, Records Management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
IBM QRadar: Who owns QRadar now?
It is split. IBM sold the QRadar SaaS assets to Palo Alto Networks in a deal announced in May 2024 and closed that September, and those customers are being migrated to Cortex XSIAM. IBM retains and supports the on-premises product.
OnBase: What is OnBase used for in government?
OnBase is used for digital permitting, inspections, and plan review processes. Government agencies use it to streamline workflows, enable online forms, automate approvals, and provide citizen access to application status.
SourceIBM QRadar: Is QRadar being discontinued?
IBM has committed to continuing support for on-premises customers, including security updates, while offering migration assistance. The cloud product's future belongs to Palo Alto. If you are signing a multi-year term, get the support horizon written into the contract.
OnBase: Does OnBase support mobile access?
Yes. Mobile access is a key feature of OnBase, allowing users to manage documents and cases on the go.
SourceIBM QRadar: How is it licensed?
By events per second for logs and flows per minute for network data, with the software or appliance sized to that rate. Add-on modules in the suite are licensed separately.
OnBase: What document management capabilities does OnBase provide?
OnBase provides centralized document storage with version control, search and retrieval tools, records management across physical and electronic lifecycles, and compliance with policies and regulations.
SourceIBM QRadar: What is an offence?
QRadar's term for a correlated case. Rules group related events and flows against a common indicator such as a host or user, so an analyst reviews one offence rather than the hundreds of events behind it.
OnBase: Can OnBase workflows be customized?
Yes. OnBase is flexible and configurable with user-defined workflows for case management, streamlining processes like accounts payable, employee onboarding, and contract management.
SourceIBM QRadar: Do I need a full-time engineer?
In practice yes for anything beyond a small deployment. Parser development, rule tuning and offence triage do not stop, and the most common failure mode is a well-installed QRadar that nobody has tuned since go-live.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- IBM QRadar vs Bitdefender Total Security
- IBM QRadar vs 1Password
- IBM QRadar vs Norton 360
- IBM QRadar vs LastPass
- IBM QRadar vs Microsoft Sentinel
- IBM QRadar vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- IBM QRadar vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- IBM QRadar vs LogRhythm SIEM
- IBM QRadar vs Recorded Future
- IBM QRadar vs SentinelOne Singularity
- IBM QRadar vs Proofpoint
- IBM QRadar vs Trend Micro Vision One
- IBM QRadar vs Arnica
- IBM QRadar vs Authelia
- IBM QRadar vs Authy
- IBM QRadar vs Baffle
- IBM QRadar vs Beyond Identity
- IBM QRadar vs BeyondTrust
- IBM QRadar vs DocuWare
- IBM QRadar vs Laserfiche
- IBM QRadar vs Accela
- IBM QRadar vs CityView
- IBM QRadar vs ClearGov
- IBM QRadar vs VUEWorks
- IBM QRadar vs CentralSquare Asset Management
- IBM QRadar vs GovPilot
- IBM QRadar vs SAP for Government
- IBM QRadar vs Workday Government
- IBM QRadar vs CivicPlus
- IBM QRadar vs Granicus
- IBM QRadar vs CKAN
- IBM QRadar vs Clariti
- IBM QRadar vs DataSF
- IBM QRadar vs Google Cloud for Government
- IBM QRadar vs GovQA
- OnBase vs Bitdefender Total Security
- OnBase vs 1Password
- OnBase vs Norton 360
- OnBase vs LastPass
- OnBase vs Microsoft Sentinel
- OnBase vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- OnBase vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- OnBase vs LogRhythm SIEM
- OnBase vs Recorded Future
- OnBase vs SentinelOne Singularity
- OnBase vs Proofpoint
- OnBase vs Trend Micro Vision One
- OnBase vs Arnica
- OnBase vs Authelia
- OnBase vs Authy
- OnBase vs Baffle
- OnBase vs Beyond Identity
- OnBase vs BeyondTrust
- OnBase vs DocuWare
- OnBase vs Laserfiche
- OnBase vs Accela
- OnBase vs CityView
- OnBase vs ClearGov
- OnBase vs VUEWorks
- OnBase vs CentralSquare Asset Management
- OnBase vs GovPilot
- OnBase vs SAP for Government
- OnBase vs Workday Government
- OnBase vs CivicPlus
- OnBase vs Granicus
- OnBase vs CKAN
- OnBase vs Clariti
- OnBase vs DataSF
- OnBase vs Google Cloud for Government
- OnBase vs GovQA

