Cybersecurity · head to head
IBM QRadar vs Laserfiche

IBM QRadar
Cybersecurity
Enterprise SIEM licensed by events per second, whose cloud business IBM sold to Palo Alto Networks in 2024.
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Each has a real cost: IBM QRadar iBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.; Laserfiche self-hosted deployment requires dedicated IT resources and infrastructure management
- They diverge on capability: IBM QRadar covers Offence model, Laserfiche covers Document Capture.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which IBM QRadar and Laserfiche actually diverge.
| Attribute | IBM QRadar | Laserfiche |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $50/month |
| Platforms | Web, Api | Web, Mobile, Windows, macOS, Linux |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Government |
| Founded | 1911 | 1976 |
Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in IBM QRadar
- Offence model
- Network flow analysis
- Device Support Modules
- Ariel query language
- Rules and building blocks
- Deployment topology
- App Exchange
- Use Case Manager
Only in Laserfiche
- Document Capture
- Workflow Automation
- Records Management
- Electronic Forms
- Process Automation
- Microsoft Office
- SharePoint
- Salesforce
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
IBM QRadar
- A regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared SaaS SIEMnot Laserfiche
- A SOC that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an NDR product separatelynot Laserfiche
- An existing QRadar estate deciding whether to stay on premises or accept the migration path to a different vendor's platformnot Laserfiche
- Compliance-driven log retention and reporting where the audit requirement is specific about collection, retention and reportingnot Laserfiche
Laserfiche
- Citizen Servicesnot IBM QRadar
- Records Managementnot IBM QRadar
- Public Safetynot IBM QRadar
- Civic Engagementnot IBM QRadar
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
IBM QRadar
- IBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.
- Licensing is by events per second and flows per minute, so every additional log source raises the cost directly and teams routinely exclude verbose sources such as DNS, proxy, endpoint and cloud audit logs to stay under the licence, which strips out exactly the data an investigation later needs.
- It needs a dedicated operator: rule tuning, parser work and offence triage are continuous jobs, and an organisation that deploys QRadar without at least one named engineer accumulates thousands of unreviewed offences and a false sense of coverage.
- A log source without a matching Device Support Module arrives unparsed, and writing a custom parser with regular expressions against an unfamiliar payload format is specialist work that can take days per source, which quietly determines which systems ever get monitored.
- On-premises capacity is planned across consoles, processors, collectors and data nodes, so outgrowing the sizing means procuring and racking more appliances rather than changing a subscription tier, and growth becomes a purchasing cycle measured in months.
Laserfiche
- Self-hosted deployment requires dedicated IT resources and infrastructure management
- Complex implementation often requires significant upfront customization
- High total cost of ownership for on-premises deployments due to infrastructure needs
Pricing, plan by plan
IBM QRadar
On request- QRadar SIEMFree
- Event and flow processing
- Offense management
- Threat intelligence
- QRadar CloudFree
- Cloud-native deployment
- Elastic scaling
- Managed infrastructure
- QRadar SuiteFree
- SIEM + SOAR + XDR
- Unified analyst experience
- Federated search
Laserfiche
$50/month- Cloud$50/month
- Document Management
- Workflow Automation
- Records Management
Which should you pick?
Choose IBM QRadar if
- You need offence model.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want network flow analysis.
Choose Laserfiche if
- You need document capture.
- You work on Web, Mobile, Windows, macOS, Linux.
- You also want workflow automation.
Questions people ask
- Is IBM QRadar or Laserfiche better?
- Neither clearly leads. IBM QRadar starts at On request and Laserfiche at $50/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, IBM QRadar or Laserfiche?
- IBM QRadar starts at On request and Laserfiche at $50/month.
- Does IBM QRadar or Laserfiche run on more platforms?
- IBM QRadar runs on Web, Api. Laserfiche runs on Web, Mobile, Windows, macOS, Linux.
- What is IBM QRadar best used for?
- IBM QRadar is most often used for a regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared saas siem, a soc that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an ndr product separately, an existing qradar estate deciding whether to stay on premises or accept the migration path to a different vendor's platform, compliance-driven log retention and reporting where the audit requirement is specific about collection, retention and reporting. Of those, a regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared saas siem and a soc that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an ndr product separately are not what Laserfiche is typically brought in for.
- What can IBM QRadar do that Laserfiche cannot?
- IBM QRadar covers Offence model, Network flow analysis, Device Support Modules, Ariel query language. Laserfiche covers Document Capture, Workflow Automation, Records Management, Electronic Forms.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
IBM QRadar: Who owns QRadar now?
It is split. IBM sold the QRadar SaaS assets to Palo Alto Networks in a deal announced in May 2024 and closed that September, and those customers are being migrated to Cortex XSIAM. IBM retains and supports the on-premises product.
Laserfiche: Does Laserfiche offer both cloud and self-hosted options?
Yes. Laserfiche Cloud offers three tiers (Starter $53/user/month, Professional $73, Business $93). Laserfiche 12 provides self-hosted deployment for organizations requiring on-premise infrastructure or with strict security and regulatory constraints.
SourceIBM QRadar: Is QRadar being discontinued?
IBM has committed to continuing support for on-premises customers, including security updates, while offering migration assistance. The cloud product's future belongs to Palo Alto. If you are signing a multi-year term, get the support horizon written into the contract.
Laserfiche: What does Laserfiche capture from documents?
Laserfiche provides document capture, electronic forms, workflow automation, case management, mobile access, and government-certified records management with automatic filing and retention schedules.
SourceIBM QRadar: How is it licensed?
By events per second for logs and flows per minute for network data, with the software or appliance sized to that rate. Add-on modules in the suite are licensed separately.
Laserfiche: Can Laserfiche track document workflows automatically?
Yes. Laserfiche includes workflow automation that tracks and fulfills processes like FOIA requests, with access controls, audit trails, and automated recordkeeping for compliance.
SourceIBM QRadar: What is an offence?
QRadar's term for a correlated case. Rules group related events and flows against a common indicator such as a host or user, so an analyst reviews one offence rather than the hundreds of events behind it.
IBM QRadar: Do I need a full-time engineer?
In practice yes for anything beyond a small deployment. Parser development, rule tuning and offence triage do not stop, and the most common failure mode is a well-installed QRadar that nobody has tuned since go-live.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- IBM QRadar vs Bitdefender Total Security
- IBM QRadar vs 1Password
- IBM QRadar vs Norton 360
- IBM QRadar vs LastPass
- IBM QRadar vs Microsoft Sentinel
- IBM QRadar vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- IBM QRadar vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- IBM QRadar vs LogRhythm SIEM
- IBM QRadar vs Recorded Future
- IBM QRadar vs SentinelOne Singularity
- IBM QRadar vs Proofpoint
- IBM QRadar vs Trend Micro Vision One
- IBM QRadar vs Arnica
- IBM QRadar vs Authelia
- IBM QRadar vs Authy
- IBM QRadar vs Baffle
- IBM QRadar vs Beyond Identity
- IBM QRadar vs BeyondTrust
- IBM QRadar vs DocuWare
- IBM QRadar vs OnBase
- IBM QRadar vs CivicPlus
- IBM QRadar vs Legistar
- IBM QRadar vs CKAN
- IBM QRadar vs Socrata
- IBM QRadar vs IAPro
- IBM QRadar vs SAP for Government
- IBM QRadar vs Axon Records
- IBM QRadar vs NextRequest
- IBM QRadar vs VUEWorks
- IBM QRadar vs ShotSpotter
- IBM QRadar vs Springbrook Software
- IBM QRadar vs Vigilant Solutions
- IBM QRadar vs Workday Government
- IBM QRadar vs Zencity
- IBM QRadar vs Granicus
- IBM QRadar vs Tyler Brazos
- Laserfiche vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Laserfiche vs 1Password
- Laserfiche vs Norton 360
- Laserfiche vs LastPass
- Laserfiche vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Laserfiche vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Laserfiche vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Laserfiche vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Laserfiche vs Recorded Future
- Laserfiche vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Laserfiche vs Proofpoint
- Laserfiche vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Laserfiche vs Arnica
- Laserfiche vs Authelia
- Laserfiche vs Authy
- Laserfiche vs Baffle
- Laserfiche vs Beyond Identity
- Laserfiche vs BeyondTrust
- Laserfiche vs DocuWare
- Laserfiche vs OnBase
- Laserfiche vs CivicPlus
- Laserfiche vs Legistar
- Laserfiche vs CKAN
- Laserfiche vs Socrata
- Laserfiche vs IAPro
- Laserfiche vs SAP for Government
- Laserfiche vs Axon Records
- Laserfiche vs NextRequest
- Laserfiche vs VUEWorks
- Laserfiche vs ShotSpotter
- Laserfiche vs Springbrook Software
- Laserfiche vs Vigilant Solutions
- Laserfiche vs Workday Government
- Laserfiche vs Zencity
- Laserfiche vs Granicus
- Laserfiche vs Tyler Brazos

