Cybersecurity · head to head
IBM QRadar vs VUEWorks

IBM QRadar
Cybersecurity
Enterprise SIEM licensed by events per second, whose cloud business IBM sold to Palo Alto Networks in 2024.
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

VUEWorks
Government
GIS-centred enterprise asset management for public agencies, built around Esri ArcGIS
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Each has a real cost: IBM QRadar iBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.; VUEWorks the product assumes a maintained enterprise ArcGIS geodatabase; agencies without one face a spatial data cleanup project before VUEWorks does anything useful, and that project is usually quoted by the same consultancy selling the software.
- They diverge on capability: IBM QRadar covers Offence model, VUEWorks covers Native Esri integration.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which IBM QRadar and VUEWorks actually diverge.
| Attribute | IBM QRadar | VUEWorks |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | subscription | quote |
| Platforms | Web, Api | Web, iOS, Android |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Government |
| Founded | 1911 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in IBM QRadar
- Offence model
- Network flow analysis
- Device Support Modules
- Ariel query language
- Rules and building blocks
- Deployment topology
- App Exchange
- Use Case Manager
Only in VUEWorks
- Native Esri integration
- Work orders and requests
- Inspections
- Condition and risk
- Capital planning
- Pavement management
- Mobile field access
- Dashboards
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
IBM QRadar
- A regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared SaaS SIEMnot VUEWorks
- A SOC that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an NDR product separatelynot VUEWorks
- An existing QRadar estate deciding whether to stay on premises or accept the migration path to a different vendor's platformnot VUEWorks
- Compliance-driven log retention and reporting where the audit requirement is specific about collection, retention and reportingnot VUEWorks
VUEWorks
- A county public works department that already runs Esri and wants work orders raised directly against map featuresnot IBM QRadar
- A stormwater utility recording CCTV sewer inspection results against pipe segments for regulatory reportingnot IBM QRadar
- A transport agency modelling pavement treatment strategies to defend a road resurfacing budgetnot IBM QRadar
- A city consolidating sign, signal and streetlight inventories that currently live in separate spreadsheetsnot IBM QRadar
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
IBM QRadar
- IBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.
- Licensing is by events per second and flows per minute, so every additional log source raises the cost directly and teams routinely exclude verbose sources such as DNS, proxy, endpoint and cloud audit logs to stay under the licence, which strips out exactly the data an investigation later needs.
- It needs a dedicated operator: rule tuning, parser work and offence triage are continuous jobs, and an organisation that deploys QRadar without at least one named engineer accumulates thousands of unreviewed offences and a false sense of coverage.
- A log source without a matching Device Support Module arrives unparsed, and writing a custom parser with regular expressions against an unfamiliar payload format is specialist work that can take days per source, which quietly determines which systems ever get monitored.
- On-premises capacity is planned across consoles, processors, collectors and data nodes, so outgrowing the sizing means procuring and racking more appliances rather than changing a subscription tier, and growth becomes a purchasing cycle measured in months.
VUEWorks
- The product assumes a maintained enterprise ArcGIS geodatabase; agencies without one face a spatial data cleanup project before VUEWorks does anything useful, and that project is usually quoted by the same consultancy selling the software.
- No pricing is published and deals are typically bundled with consulting services, which makes it hard to separate the software cost from the data work when comparing bids.
- The interface is functional rather than modern, and field crews accustomed to consumer mobile apps often resist it, which undermines the data quality the capital planning depends on.
- The Esri dependency is also an Esri cost: agencies need current ArcGIS Enterprise or ArcGIS Online licensing, and that sits outside the VUEWorks quote entirely.
- It is a small vendor with a limited partner network and a mainly North American footprint, so support and implementation capacity outside that region is thin.
Pricing, plan by plan
IBM QRadar
On request- QRadar SIEMFree
- Event and flow processing
- Offense management
- Threat intelligence
- QRadar CloudFree
- Cloud-native deployment
- Elastic scaling
- Managed infrastructure
- QRadar SuiteFree
- SIEM + SOAR + XDR
- Unified analyst experience
- Federated search
VUEWorks
On request- VUEWorks Enterprise$undefined/year
- Quoted per agency by user count and modules
- Hosted or on-premise deployment options
- GIS integration, data migration and configuration quoted separately
Which should you pick?
Choose IBM QRadar if
- You need offence model.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want network flow analysis.
Choose VUEWorks if
- You need native esri integration.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want work orders and requests.
Questions people ask
- Is IBM QRadar or VUEWorks better?
- Neither clearly leads. IBM QRadar starts at On request and VUEWorks at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, IBM QRadar or VUEWorks?
- IBM QRadar starts at On request and VUEWorks at On request.
- Does IBM QRadar or VUEWorks run on more platforms?
- IBM QRadar runs on Web, Api. VUEWorks runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is IBM QRadar best used for?
- IBM QRadar is most often used for a regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared saas siem, a soc that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an ndr product separately, an existing qradar estate deciding whether to stay on premises or accept the migration path to a different vendor's platform, compliance-driven log retention and reporting where the audit requirement is specific about collection, retention and reporting. Of those, a regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared saas siem and a soc that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an ndr product separately are not what VUEWorks is typically brought in for.
- What can IBM QRadar do that VUEWorks cannot?
- IBM QRadar covers Offence model, Network flow analysis, Device Support Modules, Ariel query language. VUEWorks covers Native Esri integration, Work orders and requests, Inspections, Condition and risk.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
IBM QRadar: Who owns QRadar now?
It is split. IBM sold the QRadar SaaS assets to Palo Alto Networks in a deal announced in May 2024 and closed that September, and those customers are being migrated to Cortex XSIAM. IBM retains and supports the on-premises product.
VUEWorks: Do we need Esri ArcGIS?
Effectively yes. The asset register is the GIS, and the ArcGIS licensing sits outside the VUEWorks quote.
IBM QRadar: Is QRadar being discontinued?
IBM has committed to continuing support for on-premises customers, including security updates, while offering migration assistance. The cloud product's future belongs to Palo Alto. If you are signing a multi-year term, get the support horizon written into the contract.
VUEWorks: Is pricing published?
No. VUEWorks is quoted per agency by users and modules, often bundled with data collection services.
IBM QRadar: How is it licensed?
By events per second for logs and flows per minute for network data, with the software or appliance sized to that rate. Add-on modules in the suite are licensed separately.
VUEWorks: Can it replace Cityworks?
It occupies the same GIS-centric municipal asset management space, so yes in principle, but migration means remapping workflows and history.
IBM QRadar: What is an offence?
QRadar's term for a correlated case. Rules group related events and flows against a common indicator such as a host or user, so an analyst reviews one offence rather than the hundreds of events behind it.
VUEWorks: Is there a cloud option?
Yes, VUEWorks is offered hosted as well as on-premise.
IBM QRadar: Do I need a full-time engineer?
In practice yes for anything beyond a small deployment. Parser development, rule tuning and offence triage do not stop, and the most common failure mode is a well-installed QRadar that nobody has tuned since go-live.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- IBM QRadar vs Bitdefender Total Security
- IBM QRadar vs 1Password
- IBM QRadar vs Norton 360
- IBM QRadar vs LastPass
- IBM QRadar vs Microsoft Sentinel
- IBM QRadar vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- IBM QRadar vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- IBM QRadar vs LogRhythm SIEM
- IBM QRadar vs Recorded Future
- IBM QRadar vs SentinelOne Singularity
- IBM QRadar vs Proofpoint
- IBM QRadar vs Trend Micro Vision One
- IBM QRadar vs Arnica
- IBM QRadar vs Authelia
- IBM QRadar vs Authy
- IBM QRadar vs Baffle
- IBM QRadar vs Beyond Identity
- IBM QRadar vs BeyondTrust
- IBM QRadar vs NEXGEN Asset Management
- IBM QRadar vs Trimble Unity Maintain
- IBM QRadar vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- IBM QRadar vs CentralSquare Asset Management
- IBM QRadar vs DataSF
- IBM QRadar vs CityView
- IBM QRadar vs RecDesk
- IBM QRadar vs DemandStar
- IBM QRadar vs Bonfire
- IBM QRadar vs NEOGOV
- IBM QRadar vs Springbrook Software
- IBM QRadar vs OpenGov
- IBM QRadar vs Legistar
- IBM QRadar vs OnBase
- IBM QRadar vs Polco
- IBM QRadar vs PublicInput
- IBM QRadar vs Socrata
- VUEWorks vs Bitdefender Total Security
- VUEWorks vs 1Password
- VUEWorks vs Norton 360
- VUEWorks vs LastPass
- VUEWorks vs Microsoft Sentinel
- VUEWorks vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- VUEWorks vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- VUEWorks vs LogRhythm SIEM
- VUEWorks vs Recorded Future
- VUEWorks vs SentinelOne Singularity
- VUEWorks vs Proofpoint
- VUEWorks vs Trend Micro Vision One
- VUEWorks vs Arnica
- VUEWorks vs Authelia
- VUEWorks vs Authy
- VUEWorks vs Baffle
- VUEWorks vs Beyond Identity
- VUEWorks vs BeyondTrust
- VUEWorks vs NEXGEN Asset Management
- VUEWorks vs Trimble Unity Maintain
- VUEWorks vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- VUEWorks vs CentralSquare Asset Management
- VUEWorks vs DataSF
- VUEWorks vs CityView
- VUEWorks vs RecDesk
- VUEWorks vs DemandStar
- VUEWorks vs Bonfire
- VUEWorks vs NEOGOV
- VUEWorks vs Springbrook Software
- VUEWorks vs OpenGov
- VUEWorks vs Legistar
- VUEWorks vs OnBase
- VUEWorks vs Polco
- VUEWorks vs PublicInput
- VUEWorks vs Socrata
