All industries · head to head
Gusto vs LiquidPlanner
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Gusto customer service can be slow and unresponsive to issues; LiquidPlanner rebranded to Tempo Portfolio Manager; the pricing page shows no published figures, only an early access sign-up
- They diverge on capability: Gusto covers Automated payroll, LiquidPlanner covers Predictive scheduling.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Gusto and LiquidPlanner actually diverge.
| Attribute | Gusto | LiquidPlanner |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $49/month | On request |
| Pricing model | Unknown | subscription |
| Category | All industries | Project Management |
| Founded | 2011 | 2006 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Gusto
- Automated payroll
- Tax filing
- Benefits administration
- Employee onboarding
- HR compliance
- Workers' comp
- 401(k) management
- QuickBooks
Only in LiquidPlanner
- Predictive scheduling
- Resource management
- Analytics
- Workload management
- Jira
- Salesforce
- SOC 2
- Web support
Both cover
- Time tracking
- Slack
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Gusto
- Payroll processingnot LiquidPlanner
- Benefits administrationnot LiquidPlanner
- Tax compliancenot LiquidPlanner
- Employee onboardingnot LiquidPlanner
- Time trackingnot LiquidPlanner
LiquidPlanner
- Productivitynot Gusto
- Collaborationnot Gusto
- Task managementnot Gusto
- Organizationnot Gusto
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Gusto
- Customer service can be slow and unresponsive to issues
- Weak reporting capabilities, cannot export data to spreadsheets for analysis
- Support staff lacks deep payroll expertise and knowledge
- Rehired employees do not have settings reset, causing manual cleanup work
- City tax handling requires additional monitoring and monitoring
- Onboarding can have issues with bank account verification and tax registration
LiquidPlanner
- Rebranded to Tempo Portfolio Manager; the pricing page shows no published figures, only an early access sign-up
Pricing, plan by plan
Gusto
$49/monthNo published plan breakdown. See the Gusto review.
LiquidPlanner
On request- Essentials$15/month
- Project management
- Basic scheduling
- Professional$25/month
- Predictive scheduling
- Resource management
- Analytics
Which should you pick?
Choose LiquidPlanner if
- You need predictive scheduling.
- You also want resource management.
Questions people ask
- Is Gusto or LiquidPlanner better?
- Neither clearly leads. Gusto starts at $49/month and LiquidPlanner at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Gusto or LiquidPlanner?
- Gusto starts at $49/month and LiquidPlanner at On request.
- Does Gusto or LiquidPlanner run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is Gusto best used for?
- Gusto is most often used for payroll processing, benefits administration, tax compliance, employee onboarding. Of those, payroll processing and benefits administration are not what LiquidPlanner is typically brought in for.
- What can Gusto do that LiquidPlanner cannot?
- Gusto covers Automated payroll, Tax filing, Benefits administration, Employee onboarding. LiquidPlanner covers Predictive scheduling, Resource management, Analytics, Workload management. Both handle Time tracking, Slack.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Gusto: What is Gusto's starting price?
Gusto starts at $49 per month plus $6 per person. The company also offers a Contractor-only plan for $35 per month plus $6 per contractor.
SourceGusto: Does Gusto include unlimited payroll runs?
Yes, all Gusto plans include unlimited payroll runs at no extra charge, including off-cycle payrolls.
SourceGusto: What core features are included in Gusto?
All plans include payroll processing, tax administration, digital onboarding, benefits enrollment, time tracking, performance management, and next-day direct deposit for most plans.
SourceGusto: Does Gusto support integrations?
Yes, Gusto integrates with accounting software, applicant tracking systems, benefits providers, time-tracking tools, and other business platforms to reduce data entry.
SourceRelated pages
More on LiquidPlanner
Other head to heads
- Gusto vs Paycom
- Gusto vs ADP Workforce Now
- Gusto vs Zenefits
- Gusto vs Ceridian Dayforce
- Gusto vs Sage Intacct
- Gusto vs UKG Pro
- Gusto vs Namely
- Gusto vs Oyster
- Gusto vs Papaya Global
- Gusto vs Paychex Flex
- Gusto vs Paylocity
- Gusto vs Remote
- Gusto vs TriNet
- Gusto vs Velocity Global
- Gusto vs Basecamp
- Gusto vs Clockwise
- Gusto vs Reclaim.ai
- Gusto vs Trello
- Gusto vs Roadmunk
- Gusto vs Toggl Plan
- Gusto vs GanttPRO
- Gusto vs MeisterTask
- Gusto vs Sunsama
- Gusto vs Craft Docs
- Gusto vs Freedcamp
- Gusto vs Hive
- Gusto vs Kanbanize
- Gusto vs Nifty
- Gusto vs Paymo
- Gusto vs Pipefy
- Gusto vs Podio
- Gusto vs ProofHub
- LiquidPlanner vs Paycom
- LiquidPlanner vs ADP Workforce Now
- LiquidPlanner vs Zenefits
- LiquidPlanner vs Ceridian Dayforce
- LiquidPlanner vs Sage Intacct
- LiquidPlanner vs UKG Pro
- LiquidPlanner vs Namely
- LiquidPlanner vs Oyster
- LiquidPlanner vs Papaya Global
- LiquidPlanner vs Paychex Flex
- LiquidPlanner vs Paylocity
- LiquidPlanner vs Remote
- LiquidPlanner vs TriNet
- LiquidPlanner vs Velocity Global
- LiquidPlanner vs Basecamp
- LiquidPlanner vs Clockwise
- LiquidPlanner vs Reclaim.ai
- LiquidPlanner vs Trello
- LiquidPlanner vs Roadmunk
- LiquidPlanner vs Toggl Plan
- LiquidPlanner vs GanttPRO
- LiquidPlanner vs MeisterTask
- LiquidPlanner vs Sunsama
- LiquidPlanner vs Craft Docs
- LiquidPlanner vs Freedcamp
- LiquidPlanner vs Hive
- LiquidPlanner vs Kanbanize
- LiquidPlanner vs Nifty
- LiquidPlanner vs Paymo
- LiquidPlanner vs Pipefy
- LiquidPlanner vs Podio
- LiquidPlanner vs ProofHub


