Maps · head to head
GraphHopper vs IndoorAtlas

GraphHopper
Maps
Open-source routing engine for road networks, providing fast route calculations, turn-by-turn navigation
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

IndoorAtlas
Maps
Indoor positioning and navigation solutions using the Earth's magnetic field, WiFi, and Bluetooth beacons
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only IndoorAtlas has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: GraphHopper the free plan is non commercial use only; IndoorAtlas requires labor-intensive fingerprinting process, walking every corridor to build magnetic map for each venue
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GraphHopper and IndoorAtlas actually diverge.
| Attribute | GraphHopper | IndoorAtlas |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web | iOS, Android, Web |
| Founded | Unknown | 2012 |
Identical on both: pricing model (freemium), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GraphHopper
Nothing recorded that IndoorAtlas does not also cover.
Only in IndoorAtlas
Nothing recorded that GraphHopper does not also cover.
Both cover
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GraphHopper
- Routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an APInot IndoorAtlas
- Map matching GPS traces and generating isochronesnot IndoorAtlas
IndoorAtlas
- Routing customers to deals in large retail spacesnot GraphHopper
- Guiding visitors through shopping centers and airportsnot GraphHopper
- Optimizing workplace space with movement analyticsnot GraphHopper
- Tracking dwell times and visitor movement patternsnot GraphHopper
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GraphHopper
- The free plan is non commercial use only
- Free allows 500 credits a day, 5 locations per request and a single vehicle
- Request complexity is capped per plan, at 30 locations and 2 vehicles on Basic at 69 EUR a month, rising to 200 locations and 20 vehicles on Premium at 479 EUR
- Isochrone range is limited by plan, at 15 minutes on Basic and 30 on Premium
- Credits are a daily allowance, so a busy day cannot draw on a quiet one
IndoorAtlas
- Requires labor-intensive fingerprinting process, walking every corridor to build magnetic map for each venue
- Magnetic signatures degrade over time, requiring periodic re-fingerprinting as the environment changes
- Magnetic interference from external sources and devices disrupts positioning accuracy
- Positioning inconsistent across different smartphone models due to magnetometer heterogeneity
- High cost to deploy and maintain, with expensive implementation for wide-scale adaptation
Pricing, plan by plan
GraphHopper
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the GraphHopper review.
IndoorAtlas
Free- TrialFree
- 1 venue
- 10 end-users
- 14 days data retention
- Develop Lite$59/month
- 1 venue
- 20 end-users
- 30 days data retention
- Develop$400/month
- unlimited venues
- 50 end-users
- 1 hour monthly support
- Pro$349/month per venue
- unlimited venues and end-users
- supports up to 10,000 m² per venue
- basic technical support
Which should you pick?
Choose GraphHopper if
Nothing in the data separates GraphHopper from IndoorAtlas on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Choose IndoorAtlas if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on iOS, Android, Web.
Questions people ask
- Is GraphHopper or IndoorAtlas better?
- Neither clearly leads. GraphHopper starts at On request and IndoorAtlas at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GraphHopper or IndoorAtlas?
- IndoorAtlas has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for GraphHopper and Free for IndoorAtlas.
- Does GraphHopper or IndoorAtlas run on more platforms?
- GraphHopper runs on Web. IndoorAtlas runs on iOS, Android, Web.
- Can I use IndoorAtlas for free?
- Yes. IndoorAtlas has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. GraphHopper starts at On request.
- What is GraphHopper best used for?
- GraphHopper is most often used for routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an api, map matching gps traces and generating isochrones. Of those, routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an api and map matching gps traces and generating isochrones are not what IndoorAtlas is typically brought in for.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
GraphHopper: Is the free plan actually usable for production?
No. The free tier is limited to non-commercial use only and includes 500 daily credits. To use GraphHopper in production, you need a paid plan starting at 69 euros per month.
SourceIndoorAtlas: How does IndoorAtlas determine positioning without beacons or hardware?
IndoorAtlas uses patented geomagnetic fusion technology that maps the Earth's magnetic field patterns inside buildings through a process called magnetic fingerprinting. The technology combines magnetometer data with other sensors like WiFi and Bluetooth for robust positioning.
SourceGraphHopper: What happens if I exceed my daily credit limit?
The page does not specify. Each tier has a daily credit limit (500 for free, 5,000 for Basic, 15,000 for Standard, 50,000 for Premium), but no overage policy is documented.
SourceIndoorAtlas: What is the initial setup process for IndoorAtlas?
Setup requires fingerprinting the venue by systematically walking through all corridors and spaces to build a magnetic map. The platform then identifies problematic areas through red (conflicting data), blue (insufficient coverage), and path orientation errors that require correction before the map is production-ready.
SourceGraphHopper: Does GraphHopper offer a trial period?
No. There is no trial period. You can start with the free plan to test, but commercial use requires a paid subscription.
SourceIndoorAtlas: What are IndoorAtlas's pricing plans?
IndoorAtlas offers production subscriptions starting at 349 euros per month per venue, with a development plan at 400 euros per month. A free tier is available for developers to start building.
SourceGraphHopper: How much does the Premium plan cost and what do I get?
Premium is 479 euros per month and includes 50,000 daily credits, up to 200 locations per request, up to 20 vehicles, email and phone support, and access to all APIs including routing and optimization.
SourceIndoorAtlas: How accurate is IndoorAtlas positioning?
IndoorAtlas claims industry-leading accuracy down to 50 centimeters using its 6-layer sensor fusion core across diverse environments, though accuracy varies based on building magnetic patterns and requires careful calibration.
SourceGraphHopper: Is there a discount if I link back to GraphHopper?
Yes. A 20% discount is available with proper attribution. The page also mentions a 99.5% uptime SLA on paid plans only.
SourceRelated pages
More on GraphHopper
More on IndoorAtlas
Other head to heads
- GraphHopper vs Google Maps Platform
- GraphHopper vs Apple Maps
- GraphHopper vs Mapbox
- GraphHopper vs HERE Technologies
- GraphHopper vs OSRM
- GraphHopper vs Ride with GPS
- GraphHopper vs Geoapify
- GraphHopper vs LocationIQ
- GraphHopper vs OpenRouteService
- GraphHopper vs Stadia Maps
- GraphHopper vs Bing Maps
- GraphHopper vs GRASS GIS
- GraphHopper vs MapTiler
- GraphHopper vs onX Maps
- GraphHopper vs Potree
- GraphHopper vs SW Maps
- GraphHopper vs WhiteboxTools
- GraphHopper vs Agisoft Metashape
- GraphHopper vs Mappedin
- GraphHopper vs Esri ArcGIS
- GraphHopper vs CesiumJS
- GraphHopper vs Felt
- GraphHopper vs Leica Infinity
- GraphHopper vs Navmii GPS
- GraphHopper vs Transit
- GraphHopper vs Lonboard
- GraphHopper vs Mapillary
- GraphHopper vs MapQuest
- GraphHopper vs MAPS.ME
- GraphHopper vs Mapzen
- GraphHopper vs ArcGIS Survey123
- GraphHopper vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- IndoorAtlas vs Google Maps Platform
- IndoorAtlas vs Apple Maps
- IndoorAtlas vs Mapbox
- IndoorAtlas vs HERE Technologies
- IndoorAtlas vs OSRM
- IndoorAtlas vs Ride with GPS
- IndoorAtlas vs Geoapify
- IndoorAtlas vs LocationIQ
- IndoorAtlas vs OpenRouteService
- IndoorAtlas vs Stadia Maps
- IndoorAtlas vs Bing Maps
- IndoorAtlas vs GRASS GIS
- IndoorAtlas vs MapTiler
- IndoorAtlas vs onX Maps
- IndoorAtlas vs Potree
- IndoorAtlas vs SW Maps
- IndoorAtlas vs WhiteboxTools
- IndoorAtlas vs Agisoft Metashape
- IndoorAtlas vs Mappedin
- IndoorAtlas vs Esri ArcGIS
- IndoorAtlas vs CesiumJS
- IndoorAtlas vs Felt
- IndoorAtlas vs Leica Infinity
- IndoorAtlas vs Navmii GPS
- IndoorAtlas vs Transit
- IndoorAtlas vs Lonboard
- IndoorAtlas vs Mapillary
- IndoorAtlas vs MapQuest
- IndoorAtlas vs MAPS.ME
- IndoorAtlas vs Mapzen
- IndoorAtlas vs ArcGIS Survey123
- IndoorAtlas vs ArcGIS Field Maps
