Software · head to head
GraphHopper vs IndoorAtlas

GraphHopper
Software
Open-source routing engine for road networks, providing fast route calculations, turn-by-turn navigation
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

IndoorAtlas
Software
Indoor positioning and navigation solutions using the Earth's magnetic field, WiFi, and Bluetooth beacons
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only IndoorAtlas has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: GraphHopper the free plan is non commercial use only; IndoorAtlas requires labor-intensive fingerprinting process, walking every corridor to build magnetic map for each venue
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GraphHopper and IndoorAtlas actually diverge.
| Attribute | GraphHopper | IndoorAtlas |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | freemium | Unknown |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web | iOS, Android, Web |
| Founded | Unknown | 2012 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GraphHopper
Nothing recorded that IndoorAtlas does not also cover.
Only in IndoorAtlas
Nothing recorded that GraphHopper does not also cover.
Both cover
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GraphHopper
- Routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an APInot IndoorAtlas
- Map matching GPS traces and generating isochronesnot IndoorAtlas
IndoorAtlas
No use cases recorded yet. See the IndoorAtlas review.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GraphHopper
- The free plan is non commercial use only
- Free allows 500 credits a day, 5 locations per request and a single vehicle
- Request complexity is capped per plan, at 30 locations and 2 vehicles on Basic at 69 EUR a month, rising to 200 locations and 20 vehicles on Premium at 479 EUR
- Isochrone range is limited by plan, at 15 minutes on Basic and 30 on Premium
- Credits are a daily allowance, so a busy day cannot draw on a quiet one
IndoorAtlas
- Requires labor-intensive fingerprinting process, walking every corridor to build magnetic map for each venue
- Magnetic signatures degrade over time, requiring periodic re-fingerprinting as the environment changes
- Magnetic interference from external sources and devices disrupts positioning accuracy
- Positioning inconsistent across different smartphone models due to magnetometer heterogeneity
- High cost to deploy and maintain, with expensive implementation for wide-scale adaptation
Pricing, plan by plan
GraphHopper
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the GraphHopper review.
IndoorAtlas
Free- Development$400/month
- Free tier available
- Production$349/month
- Per-venue subscription
- Multi-layer sensor fusion
Which should you pick?
Choose GraphHopper if
Nothing in the data separates GraphHopper from IndoorAtlas on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Choose IndoorAtlas if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on iOS, Android, Web.
Questions people ask
- Is GraphHopper or IndoorAtlas better?
- Neither clearly leads. GraphHopper starts at On request and IndoorAtlas at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GraphHopper or IndoorAtlas?
- IndoorAtlas has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for GraphHopper and Free for IndoorAtlas.
- Does GraphHopper or IndoorAtlas run on more platforms?
- GraphHopper runs on Web. IndoorAtlas runs on iOS, Android, Web.
- Can I use IndoorAtlas for free?
- Yes. IndoorAtlas has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. GraphHopper starts at On request.
- What is GraphHopper best used for?
- GraphHopper is most often used for routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an api, map matching gps traces and generating isochrones. Of those, routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an api and map matching gps traces and generating isochrones are not what IndoorAtlas is typically brought in for.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
IndoorAtlas: How does IndoorAtlas determine positioning without beacons or hardware?
IndoorAtlas uses patented geomagnetic fusion technology that maps the Earth's magnetic field patterns inside buildings through a process called magnetic fingerprinting. The technology combines magnetometer data with other sensors like WiFi and Bluetooth for robust positioning.
SourceIndoorAtlas: What is the initial setup process for IndoorAtlas?
Setup requires fingerprinting the venue by systematically walking through all corridors and spaces to build a magnetic map. The platform then identifies problematic areas through red (conflicting data), blue (insufficient coverage), and path orientation errors that require correction before the map is production-ready.
SourceIndoorAtlas: What are IndoorAtlas's pricing plans?
IndoorAtlas offers production subscriptions starting at 349 euros per month per venue, with a development plan at 400 euros per month. A free tier is available for developers to start building.
SourceIndoorAtlas: How accurate is IndoorAtlas positioning?
IndoorAtlas claims industry-leading accuracy down to 50 centimeters using its 6-layer sensor fusion core across diverse environments, though accuracy varies based on building magnetic patterns and requires careful calibration.
SourceRelated pages
More on GraphHopper
More on IndoorAtlas
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- GraphHopper vs Mapbox
- GraphHopper vs Google Maps Platform
- GraphHopper vs HERE Technologies
- GraphHopper vs Apple Maps
- GraphHopper vs Leaflet
- GraphHopper vs Esri ArcGIS
- GraphHopper vs CesiumJS
- GraphHopper vs Samsara
- GraphHopper vs Bing Maps
- GraphHopper vs CARTO
- GraphHopper vs Geotab
- GraphHopper vs HERE WeGo
- GraphHopper vs Mappedin
- GraphHopper vs Verizon Connect
- GraphHopper vs AllTrails
- GraphHopper vs Citymapper
- GraphHopper vs deck.gl
- IndoorAtlas vs Mapbox
- IndoorAtlas vs Google Maps Platform
- IndoorAtlas vs HERE Technologies
- IndoorAtlas vs Apple Maps
- IndoorAtlas vs Leaflet
- IndoorAtlas vs Esri ArcGIS
- IndoorAtlas vs CesiumJS
- IndoorAtlas vs Samsara
- IndoorAtlas vs Bing Maps
- IndoorAtlas vs CARTO
- IndoorAtlas vs Geotab
- IndoorAtlas vs HERE WeGo
- IndoorAtlas vs Mappedin
- IndoorAtlas vs Verizon Connect
- IndoorAtlas vs AllTrails
- IndoorAtlas vs Citymapper
- IndoorAtlas vs deck.gl
