Software · head to head
GraphHopper vs Mapzen

GraphHopper
Software
Open-source routing engine for road networks, providing fast route calculations, turn-by-turn navigation
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Mapzen
Software
Mapzen was an open-source mapping platform that provided geocoding, routing, and map rendering services
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: GraphHopper the free plan is non commercial use only; Mapzen the vendor's own pricing page as captured by the Internet Archive on 2 January 2018 priced its mobility APIs on a free tier plus overage model: Turn-by-Turn navigation free for the first 5,000 requests per month then 50 cents per additional 1,000 requests, and Isochrone and Optimized Route each free for the first 100 requests per month then $1.50 per additional 1,000 requests; Mapzen shut down as a project in 2018 shortly after this capture and this pricing no longer applies to any live service
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GraphHopper and Mapzen actually diverge.
| Attribute | GraphHopper | Mapzen |
|---|
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (freemium), free tier (No), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GraphHopper
Nothing recorded that Mapzen does not also cover.
Only in Mapzen
Nothing recorded that GraphHopper does not also cover.
Both cover
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GraphHopper
- Routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an APInot Mapzen
- Map matching GPS traces and generating isochronesnot Mapzen
Mapzen
No use cases recorded yet. See the Mapzen review.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GraphHopper
- The free plan is non commercial use only
- Free allows 500 credits a day, 5 locations per request and a single vehicle
- Request complexity is capped per plan, at 30 locations and 2 vehicles on Basic at 69 EUR a month, rising to 200 locations and 20 vehicles on Premium at 479 EUR
- Isochrone range is limited by plan, at 15 minutes on Basic and 30 on Premium
- Credits are a daily allowance, so a busy day cannot draw on a quiet one
Mapzen
- The vendor's own pricing page as captured by the Internet Archive on 2 January 2018 priced its mobility APIs on a free tier plus overage model: Turn-by-Turn navigation free for the first 5,000 requests per month then 50 cents per additional 1,000 requests, and Isochrone and Optimized Route each free for the first 100 requests per month then $1.50 per additional 1,000 requests; Mapzen shut down as a project in 2018 shortly after this capture and this pricing no longer applies to any live service
Pricing, plan by plan
GraphHopper
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the GraphHopper review.
Mapzen
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Mapzen review.
Which should you pick?
Choose GraphHopper if
Nothing in the data separates GraphHopper from Mapzen on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Choose Mapzen if
Nothing in the data separates Mapzen from GraphHopper on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is GraphHopper or Mapzen better?
- Neither clearly leads. GraphHopper starts at On request and Mapzen at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GraphHopper or Mapzen?
- GraphHopper starts at On request and Mapzen at On request.
- Does GraphHopper or Mapzen run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is GraphHopper best used for?
- GraphHopper is most often used for routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an api, map matching gps traces and generating isochrones. Of those, routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an api and map matching gps traces and generating isochrones are not what Mapzen is typically brought in for.
Related pages
More on GraphHopper
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- GraphHopper vs Mapbox
- GraphHopper vs Google Maps Platform
- GraphHopper vs HERE Technologies
- GraphHopper vs Apple Maps
- GraphHopper vs Leaflet
- GraphHopper vs Esri ArcGIS
- GraphHopper vs CesiumJS
- GraphHopper vs Samsara
- GraphHopper vs Bing Maps
- GraphHopper vs CARTO
- GraphHopper vs Geotab
- GraphHopper vs HERE WeGo
- GraphHopper vs IndoorAtlas
- GraphHopper vs Mappedin
- GraphHopper vs Verizon Connect
- GraphHopper vs AllTrails
- GraphHopper vs Citymapper
- GraphHopper vs deck.gl
- Mapzen vs Mapbox
- Mapzen vs Google Maps Platform
- Mapzen vs HERE Technologies
- Mapzen vs Apple Maps
- Mapzen vs Leaflet
- Mapzen vs Esri ArcGIS
- Mapzen vs CesiumJS
- Mapzen vs Samsara
- Mapzen vs Bing Maps
- Mapzen vs CARTO
- Mapzen vs Geotab
- Mapzen vs HERE WeGo
- Mapzen vs IndoorAtlas
- Mapzen vs Mappedin
- Mapzen vs Verizon Connect
- Mapzen vs AllTrails
- Mapzen vs Citymapper
- Mapzen vs deck.gl
