Maps · head to head
GraphHopper vs Mapillary

GraphHopper
Maps
Open-source routing engine for road networks, providing fast route calculations, turn-by-turn navigation
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Mapillary
Maps
Platform for street-level imagery that crowdsources images to map the world and
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: GraphHopper the free plan is non commercial use only; Mapillary no pricing information published on main website pages, suggesting either free service or hidden pricing model
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GraphHopper and Mapillary actually diverge.
| Attribute | GraphHopper | Mapillary |
|---|
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (freemium), free tier (No), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GraphHopper
Nothing recorded that Mapillary does not also cover.
Only in Mapillary
Nothing recorded that GraphHopper does not also cover.
Both cover
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GraphHopper
- Routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an APInot Mapillary
- Map matching GPS traces and generating isochronesnot Mapillary
Mapillary
- Street-level imagery for map editing and verificationnot GraphHopper
- Crowdsourcing photos to keep a map currentnot GraphHopper
- Extracting map features automatically with computer visionnot GraphHopper
- Embedding street imagery with MapillaryJSnot GraphHopper
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GraphHopper
- The free plan is non commercial use only
- Free allows 500 credits a day, 5 locations per request and a single vehicle
- Request complexity is capped per plan, at 30 locations and 2 vehicles on Basic at 69 EUR a month, rising to 200 locations and 20 vehicles on Premium at 479 EUR
- Isochrone range is limited by plan, at 15 minutes on Basic and 30 on Premium
- Credits are a daily allowance, so a busy day cannot draw on a quiet one
Mapillary
- No pricing information published on main website pages, suggesting either free service or hidden pricing model
- Unclear monetization strategy makes it difficult for businesses to understand licensing costs for commercial use
- No published tier structure or feature limits visible to potential customers
Pricing, plan by plan
GraphHopper
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the GraphHopper review.
Mapillary
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Mapillary review.
Which should you pick?
Choose GraphHopper if
Nothing in the data separates GraphHopper from Mapillary on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Choose Mapillary if
Nothing in the data separates Mapillary from GraphHopper on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is GraphHopper or Mapillary better?
- Neither clearly leads. GraphHopper starts at On request and Mapillary at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GraphHopper or Mapillary?
- GraphHopper starts at On request and Mapillary at On request.
- Does GraphHopper or Mapillary run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is GraphHopper best used for?
- GraphHopper is most often used for routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an api, map matching gps traces and generating isochrones. Of those, routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an api and map matching gps traces and generating isochrones are not what Mapillary is typically brought in for.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
GraphHopper: Is the free plan actually usable for production?
No. The free tier is limited to non-commercial use only and includes 500 daily credits. To use GraphHopper in production, you need a paid plan starting at 69 euros per month.
SourceMapillary: What is the pricing model for Mapillary?
Mapillary does not publish pricing information on its main website pages. The platform focuses on features like street-level imagery access, map updating through computer vision, and open data sharing, but specific costs and licensing tiers are not disclosed publicly.
SourceGraphHopper: What happens if I exceed my daily credit limit?
The page does not specify. Each tier has a daily credit limit (500 for free, 5,000 for Basic, 15,000 for Standard, 50,000 for Premium), but no overage policy is documented.
SourceMapillary: Can I use Mapillary for commercial purposes?
Specific details about commercial licensing for Mapillary are not published on the main website. Interested businesses should contact Mapillary directly through their support channels to discuss commercial use cases and licensing options.
SourceGraphHopper: Does GraphHopper offer a trial period?
No. There is no trial period. You can start with the free plan to test, but commercial use requires a paid subscription.
SourceMapillary: Is Mapillary free to use for individual contributors?
Mapillary emphasizes open data sharing and community contributions but specific details about free vs. paid access for individuals are not clearly stated on the main website. Contact Mapillary support for clarification on access terms.
SourceGraphHopper: How much does the Premium plan cost and what do I get?
Premium is 479 euros per month and includes 50,000 daily credits, up to 200 locations per request, up to 20 vehicles, email and phone support, and access to all APIs including routing and optimization.
SourceGraphHopper: Is there a discount if I link back to GraphHopper?
Yes. A 20% discount is available with proper attribution. The page also mentions a 99.5% uptime SLA on paid plans only.
SourceRelated pages
More on GraphHopper
Other head to heads
- GraphHopper vs Google Maps Platform
- GraphHopper vs Apple Maps
- GraphHopper vs Mapbox
- GraphHopper vs HERE Technologies
- GraphHopper vs OSRM
- GraphHopper vs Ride with GPS
- GraphHopper vs Geoapify
- GraphHopper vs LocationIQ
- GraphHopper vs OpenRouteService
- GraphHopper vs Stadia Maps
- GraphHopper vs Bing Maps
- GraphHopper vs GRASS GIS
- GraphHopper vs MapTiler
- GraphHopper vs onX Maps
- GraphHopper vs Potree
- GraphHopper vs SW Maps
- GraphHopper vs WhiteboxTools
- GraphHopper vs Agisoft Metashape
- GraphHopper vs CesiumJS
- GraphHopper vs AllTrails
- GraphHopper vs Gaia GPS
- GraphHopper vs Correlator3D
- GraphHopper vs Emlid Studio
- GraphHopper vs Foursquare Places API
- GraphHopper vs Kepler.gl
- GraphHopper vs Trailforks
- GraphHopper vs Cesium ion
- GraphHopper vs Citymapper
- Mapillary vs Google Maps Platform
- Mapillary vs Apple Maps
- Mapillary vs Mapbox
- Mapillary vs HERE Technologies
- Mapillary vs OSRM
- Mapillary vs Ride with GPS
- Mapillary vs Geoapify
- Mapillary vs LocationIQ
- Mapillary vs OpenRouteService
- Mapillary vs Stadia Maps
- Mapillary vs Bing Maps
- Mapillary vs GRASS GIS
- Mapillary vs MapTiler
- Mapillary vs onX Maps
- Mapillary vs Potree
- Mapillary vs SW Maps
- Mapillary vs WhiteboxTools
- Mapillary vs Agisoft Metashape
- Mapillary vs CesiumJS
- Mapillary vs AllTrails
- Mapillary vs Gaia GPS
- Mapillary vs Correlator3D
- Mapillary vs Emlid Studio
- Mapillary vs Foursquare Places API
- Mapillary vs Kepler.gl
- Mapillary vs Trailforks
- Mapillary vs Cesium ion
- Mapillary vs Citymapper
