Maps · head to head
IndoorAtlas vs Potree

IndoorAtlas
Maps
Indoor positioning and navigation solutions using the Earth's magnetic field, WiFi, and Bluetooth beacons
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Potree
Maps
Open source WebGL viewer for publishing very large point clouds in a browser
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: IndoorAtlas requires labor-intensive fingerprinting process, walking every corridor to build magnetic map for each venue; Potree there is no vendor, no support contract and no service level, so anything you build on Potree is your organisation’s responsibility to maintain when a browser update breaks rendering.
- They diverge on capability: IndoorAtlas covers Core Functionality, Potree covers Octree streaming.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which IndoorAtlas and Potree actually diverge.
| Attribute | IndoorAtlas | Potree |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | iOS, Android, Web | Web, Windows, macOS, Linux |
| Founded | 2012 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in IndoorAtlas
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
Only in Potree
- Octree streaming
- Large dataset rendering
- Measurement tools
- Clipping and profiles
- Annotations
- Attribute colouring
- PotreeDesktop
- Self-hosting
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
IndoorAtlas
- Routing customers to deals in large retail spacesnot Potree
- Guiding visitors through shopping centers and airportsnot Potree
- Optimizing workplace space with movement analyticsnot Potree
- Tracking dwell times and visitor movement patternsnot Potree
Potree
- A drone survey firm delivering a point cloud to a client who has no desktop software, by publishing a browser viewer link instead of a 40 GB LAZ filenot IndoorAtlas
- A heritage or archaeology project publishing a scanned site for public access without paying per-gigabyte hosting to a commercial platformnot IndoorAtlas
- An engineering consultancy embedding a point cloud viewer inside its own client portal without licensing a commercial web viewernot IndoorAtlas
- A university or research group that needs measurement and profiling in a shareable viewer for a dataset too large to emailnot IndoorAtlas
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
IndoorAtlas
- Requires labor-intensive fingerprinting process, walking every corridor to build magnetic map for each venue
- Magnetic signatures degrade over time, requiring periodic re-fingerprinting as the environment changes
- Magnetic interference from external sources and devices disrupts positioning accuracy
- Positioning inconsistent across different smartphone models due to magnetometer heterogeneity
- High cost to deploy and maintain, with expensive implementation for wide-scale adaptation
Potree
- There is no vendor, no support contract and no service level, so anything you build on Potree is your organisation’s responsibility to maintain when a browser update breaks rendering.
- Conversion is a separate manual step with PotreeConverter, and building an automated publishing pipeline around it is engineering work the project does not provide.
- Rendering quality and performance depend on the client machine and WebGL support, so a client on a locked-down corporate laptop with poor graphics may see a viewer that stutters or fails outright.
- A WebGPU rewrite, Potree-Next, is in progress and is not a drop-in upgrade, so current integrations face an eventual migration with no vendor to manage it.
- There is no access control, user management or audit layer; anyone with the URL sees the data unless you build authentication around the static files yourself, which is a real problem for confidential sites.
Pricing, plan by plan
IndoorAtlas
Free- TrialFree
- 1 venue
- 10 end-users
- 14 days data retention
- Develop Lite$59/month
- 1 venue
- 20 end-users
- 30 days data retention
- Develop$400/month
- unlimited venues
- 50 end-users
- 1 hour monthly support
- Pro$349/month per venue
- unlimited venues and end-users
- supports up to 10,000 m² per venue
- basic technical support
Potree
Free- PotreeFree
- BSD-style open source licence
- Unlimited datasets and viewers
- Self-hosted on any static web server
Which should you pick?
Choose IndoorAtlas if
- You need core functionality.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on iOS, Android, Web.
- You also want user interface.
Choose Potree if
- You need octree streaming.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Windows, macOS, Linux.
- You also want large dataset rendering.
Questions people ask
- Is IndoorAtlas or Potree better?
- Neither clearly leads. IndoorAtlas starts at Free and Potree at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, IndoorAtlas or Potree?
- IndoorAtlas starts at Free and Potree at Free.
- Does IndoorAtlas or Potree run on more platforms?
- IndoorAtlas runs on iOS, Android, Web. Potree runs on Web, Windows, macOS, Linux.
- Can I use IndoorAtlas for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is IndoorAtlas best used for?
- IndoorAtlas is most often used for routing customers to deals in large retail spaces, guiding visitors through shopping centers and airports, optimizing workplace space with movement analytics, tracking dwell times and visitor movement patterns. Of those, routing customers to deals in large retail spaces and guiding visitors through shopping centers and airports are not what Potree is typically brought in for.
- What can IndoorAtlas do that Potree cannot?
- IndoorAtlas covers Core Functionality, User Interface. Potree covers Octree streaming, Large dataset rendering, Measurement tools, Clipping and profiles.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
IndoorAtlas: How does IndoorAtlas determine positioning without beacons or hardware?
IndoorAtlas uses patented geomagnetic fusion technology that maps the Earth's magnetic field patterns inside buildings through a process called magnetic fingerprinting. The technology combines magnetometer data with other sensors like WiFi and Bluetooth for robust positioning.
SourcePotree: Does Potree cost anything?
No. It is open source and free. You supply the hosting, which for a static viewer is inexpensive.
IndoorAtlas: What is the initial setup process for IndoorAtlas?
Setup requires fingerprinting the venue by systematically walking through all corridors and spaces to build a magnetic map. The platform then identifies problematic areas through red (conflicting data), blue (insufficient coverage), and path orientation errors that require correction before the map is production-ready.
SourcePotree: Is there commercial support?
No. There is no vendor and no support contract. Support is GitHub issues and the community.
IndoorAtlas: What are IndoorAtlas's pricing plans?
IndoorAtlas offers production subscriptions starting at 349 euros per month per venue, with a development plan at 400 euros per month. A free tier is available for developers to start building.
SourcePotree: Who maintains it?
It originated at TU Wien and is maintained principally by Markus Schütz, with community contributions.
IndoorAtlas: How accurate is IndoorAtlas positioning?
IndoorAtlas claims industry-leading accuracy down to 50 centimeters using its 6-layer sensor fusion core across diverse environments, though accuracy varies based on building magnetic patterns and requires careful calibration.
SourcePotree: Can it handle very large clouds?
Yes, hundreds of millions of points, because PotreeConverter builds a multi-resolution octree that streams only what is visible.
Potree: Is my data private?
Only if you make it so. Potree serves static files with no built-in authentication, so access control is entirely your responsibility.
Related pages
More on IndoorAtlas
Other head to heads
- IndoorAtlas vs Mappedin
- IndoorAtlas vs Esri ArcGIS
- IndoorAtlas vs CesiumJS
- IndoorAtlas vs SW Maps
- IndoorAtlas vs Felt
- IndoorAtlas vs Leica Infinity
- IndoorAtlas vs Navmii GPS
- IndoorAtlas vs Transit
- IndoorAtlas vs Mapbox
- IndoorAtlas vs Google Maps Platform
- IndoorAtlas vs LocationIQ
- IndoorAtlas vs Lonboard
- IndoorAtlas vs Mapillary
- IndoorAtlas vs MapQuest
- IndoorAtlas vs MAPS.ME
- IndoorAtlas vs Mapzen
- IndoorAtlas vs ArcGIS Survey123
- IndoorAtlas vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- IndoorAtlas vs WhiteboxTools
- IndoorAtlas vs QGIS
- IndoorAtlas vs Global Mapper
- IndoorAtlas vs Agisoft Metashape
- IndoorAtlas vs SAGA GIS
- IndoorAtlas vs GRASS GIS
- IndoorAtlas vs deck.gl
- IndoorAtlas vs Ride with GPS
- IndoorAtlas vs Kepler.gl
- IndoorAtlas vs Trailforks
- IndoorAtlas vs AllTrails
- IndoorAtlas vs Bing Maps
- IndoorAtlas vs Cesium ion
- IndoorAtlas vs Citymapper
- Potree vs Mappedin
- Potree vs Esri ArcGIS
- Potree vs CesiumJS
- Potree vs SW Maps
- Potree vs Felt
- Potree vs Leica Infinity
- Potree vs Navmii GPS
- Potree vs Transit
- Potree vs Mapbox
- Potree vs Google Maps Platform
- Potree vs LocationIQ
- Potree vs Lonboard
- Potree vs Mapillary
- Potree vs MapQuest
- Potree vs MAPS.ME
- Potree vs Mapzen
- Potree vs ArcGIS Survey123
- Potree vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- Potree vs WhiteboxTools
- Potree vs QGIS
- Potree vs Global Mapper
- Potree vs Agisoft Metashape
- Potree vs SAGA GIS
- Potree vs GRASS GIS
- Potree vs deck.gl
- Potree vs Ride with GPS
- Potree vs Kepler.gl
- Potree vs Trailforks
- Potree vs AllTrails
- Potree vs Bing Maps
- Potree vs Cesium ion
- Potree vs Citymapper
