Maps · head to head
IndoorAtlas vs Stadia Maps

IndoorAtlas
Maps
Indoor positioning and navigation solutions using the Earth's magnetic field, WiFi, and Bluetooth beacons
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
Stadia Maps
Maps
High-performance map tiles, routing, geocoding, and search APIs for developers with reliable
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: IndoorAtlas requires labor-intensive fingerprinting process, walking every corridor to build magnetic map for each venue; Stadia Maps limited customization features compared to Mapbox
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which IndoorAtlas and Stadia Maps actually diverge.
| Attribute | IndoorAtlas | Stadia Maps |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | Unknown |
| Platforms | iOS, Android, Web | Web, JavaScript |
| Founded | 2012 | 2016 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in IndoorAtlas
Nothing recorded that Stadia Maps does not also cover.
Only in Stadia Maps
Nothing recorded that IndoorAtlas does not also cover.
Both cover
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
IndoorAtlas
- Routing customers to deals in large retail spacesnot Stadia Maps
- Guiding visitors through shopping centers and airportsnot Stadia Maps
- Optimizing workplace space with movement analyticsnot Stadia Maps
- Tracking dwell times and visitor movement patternsnot Stadia Maps
Stadia Maps
No use cases recorded yet. See the Stadia Maps review.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
IndoorAtlas
- Requires labor-intensive fingerprinting process, walking every corridor to build magnetic map for each venue
- Magnetic signatures degrade over time, requiring periodic re-fingerprinting as the environment changes
- Magnetic interference from external sources and devices disrupts positioning accuracy
- Positioning inconsistent across different smartphone models due to magnetometer heterogeneity
- High cost to deploy and maintain, with expensive implementation for wide-scale adaptation
Stadia Maps
- Limited customization features compared to Mapbox
- Relies entirely on OpenStreetMap data, inheriting its accuracy and coverage limitations
- Smaller service with fewer community resources and support options compared to Google Maps or Mapbox
- Limited real-time traffic data compared to larger mapping providers like Google Maps
Pricing, plan by plan
IndoorAtlas
Free- TrialFree
- 1 venue
- 10 end-users
- 14 days data retention
- Develop Lite$59/month
- 1 venue
- 20 end-users
- 30 days data retention
- Develop$400/month
- unlimited venues
- 50 end-users
- 1 hour monthly support
- Pro$349/month per venue
- unlimited venues and end-users
- supports up to 10,000 m² per venue
- basic technical support
Stadia Maps
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Stadia Maps review.
Which should you pick?
Choose IndoorAtlas if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on iOS, Android, Web.
Choose Stadia Maps if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, JavaScript.
Questions people ask
- Is IndoorAtlas or Stadia Maps better?
- Neither clearly leads. IndoorAtlas starts at Free and Stadia Maps at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, IndoorAtlas or Stadia Maps?
- IndoorAtlas starts at Free and Stadia Maps at Free.
- Does IndoorAtlas or Stadia Maps run on more platforms?
- IndoorAtlas runs on iOS, Android, Web. Stadia Maps runs on Web, JavaScript.
- Can I use IndoorAtlas for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is IndoorAtlas best used for?
- IndoorAtlas is most often used for routing customers to deals in large retail spaces, guiding visitors through shopping centers and airports, optimizing workplace space with movement analytics, tracking dwell times and visitor movement patterns. Of those, routing customers to deals in large retail spaces and guiding visitors through shopping centers and airports are not what Stadia Maps is typically brought in for.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
IndoorAtlas: How does IndoorAtlas determine positioning without beacons or hardware?
IndoorAtlas uses patented geomagnetic fusion technology that maps the Earth's magnetic field patterns inside buildings through a process called magnetic fingerprinting. The technology combines magnetometer data with other sensors like WiFi and Bluetooth for robust positioning.
SourceStadia Maps: What is Stadia Maps' pricing model?
Stadia Maps uses a credits-based pricing model with fixed credit pools to prevent billing shock. Starter, Standard, and Professional plans are available, with a 14-day free trial for new accounts.
SourceIndoorAtlas: What is the initial setup process for IndoorAtlas?
Setup requires fingerprinting the venue by systematically walking through all corridors and spaces to build a magnetic map. The platform then identifies problematic areas through red (conflicting data), blue (insufficient coverage), and path orientation errors that require correction before the map is production-ready.
SourceStadia Maps: Does Stadia Maps have a free tier?
Yes, Stadia Maps offers a free tier for development, evaluation, and non-commercial use including academic applications.
SourceIndoorAtlas: What are IndoorAtlas's pricing plans?
IndoorAtlas offers production subscriptions starting at 349 euros per month per venue, with a development plan at 400 euros per month. A free tier is available for developers to start building.
SourceStadia Maps: What data does Stadia Maps use?
Stadia Maps builds on OpenStreetMap data, so the coverage and accuracy depend on OSM's crowdsourced contributors.
SourceIndoorAtlas: How accurate is IndoorAtlas positioning?
IndoorAtlas claims industry-leading accuracy down to 50 centimeters using its 6-layer sensor fusion core across diverse environments, though accuracy varies based on building magnetic patterns and requires careful calibration.
SourceRelated pages
More on IndoorAtlas
More on Stadia Maps
Other head to heads
- IndoorAtlas vs Mappedin
- IndoorAtlas vs Esri ArcGIS
- IndoorAtlas vs CesiumJS
- IndoorAtlas vs SW Maps
- IndoorAtlas vs Felt
- IndoorAtlas vs Leica Infinity
- IndoorAtlas vs Navmii GPS
- IndoorAtlas vs Transit
- IndoorAtlas vs Mapbox
- IndoorAtlas vs Google Maps Platform
- IndoorAtlas vs LocationIQ
- IndoorAtlas vs Lonboard
- IndoorAtlas vs Mapillary
- IndoorAtlas vs MapQuest
- IndoorAtlas vs MAPS.ME
- IndoorAtlas vs Mapzen
- IndoorAtlas vs ArcGIS Survey123
- IndoorAtlas vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- IndoorAtlas vs Leaflet
- IndoorAtlas vs Geoapify
- IndoorAtlas vs OpenRouteService
- IndoorAtlas vs OSRM
- IndoorAtlas vs Bing Maps
- IndoorAtlas vs GraphHopper
- IndoorAtlas vs MapTiler
- IndoorAtlas vs Nominatim
- IndoorAtlas vs OpenLayers
- IndoorAtlas vs OpenStreetMap
- IndoorAtlas vs Google Maps
- Stadia Maps vs Mappedin
- Stadia Maps vs Esri ArcGIS
- Stadia Maps vs CesiumJS
- Stadia Maps vs SW Maps
- Stadia Maps vs Felt
- Stadia Maps vs Leica Infinity
- Stadia Maps vs Navmii GPS
- Stadia Maps vs Transit
- Stadia Maps vs Mapbox
- Stadia Maps vs Google Maps Platform
- Stadia Maps vs LocationIQ
- Stadia Maps vs Lonboard
- Stadia Maps vs Mapillary
- Stadia Maps vs MapQuest
- Stadia Maps vs MAPS.ME
- Stadia Maps vs Mapzen
- Stadia Maps vs ArcGIS Survey123
- Stadia Maps vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- Stadia Maps vs Leaflet
- Stadia Maps vs Geoapify
- Stadia Maps vs OpenRouteService
- Stadia Maps vs OSRM
- Stadia Maps vs Bing Maps
- Stadia Maps vs GraphHopper
- Stadia Maps vs MapTiler
- Stadia Maps vs Nominatim
- Stadia Maps vs OpenLayers
- Stadia Maps vs OpenStreetMap
- Stadia Maps vs Google Maps
