Maps · head to head
Agisoft Metashape vs GraphHopper

Agisoft Metashape
Maps
Desktop photogrammetry that turns photographs into point clouds, meshes, orthomosaics and DEMs
- From
- $179/one-time
- Rated
- -

GraphHopper
Maps
Open-source routing engine for road networks, providing fast route calculations, turn-by-turn navigation
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Agisoft Metashape processing is entirely local, so throughput is a function of your workstation, and a large project on modest hardware can take days where a cloud service would return results overnight.; GraphHopper the free plan is non commercial use only
- They diverge on capability: Agisoft Metashape covers Structure-from-motion alignment, GraphHopper covers Core Functionality.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Agisoft Metashape and GraphHopper actually diverge.
| Attribute | Agisoft Metashape | GraphHopper |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $179/one-time | On request |
| Pricing model | One-time purchase | freemium |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux | Web |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Agisoft Metashape
- Structure-from-motion alignment
- Dense point cloud generation
- Mesh and texture
- Orthomosaic and DEM
- Ground control points
- Point cloud classification
- Multispectral processing
- Python and Java scripting
Only in GraphHopper
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Agisoft Metashape
- A survey or engineering firm processing high volumes of drone imagery that wants unlimited local processing instead of per-hectare cloud creditsnot GraphHopper
- A quarry or mine measuring stockpile volumes monthly, where the same flight is reprocessed repeatedly and cloud pricing by area is punitivenot GraphHopper
- An archaeology or heritage team documenting sites on a capital grant with no recurring software budget to renew a subscriptionnot GraphHopper
- A VFX or games studio scanning props and environments, where Standard at $179 covers the whole requirement because georeferencing is irrelevantnot GraphHopper
GraphHopper
- Routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an APInot Agisoft Metashape
- Map matching GPS traces and generating isochronesnot Agisoft Metashape
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Agisoft Metashape
- Processing is entirely local, so throughput is a function of your workstation, and a large project on modest hardware can take days where a cloud service would return results overnight.
- The vendor is a Russian company, and since 2022 payment is restricted to wire transfer, ACH and SEPA direct debit with no card payment, which some corporate and government procurement departments simply cannot process.
- There is no collaboration layer: no shared projects, no web viewer, no permissions. Sharing results means sending files, which is a real limitation on multi-office teams.
- Support is thin compared with commercial drone platforms, and the software assumes photogrammetric competence; users who do not understand overlap, ground control and residuals produce confidently wrong models.
- A node-locked licence is tied to a machine, and moving it or covering a second workstation means either a reseller-quoted floating licence or buying twice, which erodes the cost advantage for teams rather than individuals.
GraphHopper
- The free plan is non commercial use only
- Free allows 500 credits a day, 5 locations per request and a single vehicle
- Request complexity is capped per plan, at 30 locations and 2 vehicles on Basic at 69 EUR a month, rising to 200 locations and 20 vehicles on Premium at 479 EUR
- Isochrone range is limited by plan, at 15 minutes on Basic and 30 on Premium
- Credits are a daily allowance, so a busy day cannot draw on a quiet one
Pricing, plan by plan
Agisoft Metashape
$179/one-time- Standard$179/one-time
- Photogrammetric alignment, dense cloud, mesh and texture
- No georeferencing or coordinate systems
- No ground control points
- Professional$3499/one-time
- Everything in Standard
- Georeferencing, coordinate systems and ground control points
- Orthomosaic, DEM and point cloud classification
- Floating licence$undefined/one-time
- Shared across machines rather than node-locked
- Sold through authorised resellers only
- Quoted rather than listed
GraphHopper
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the GraphHopper review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Agisoft Metashape if
- You need structure-from-motion alignment.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux.
- You also want dense point cloud generation.
Questions people ask
- Is Agisoft Metashape or GraphHopper better?
- Neither clearly leads. Agisoft Metashape starts at $179/one-time and GraphHopper at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Agisoft Metashape or GraphHopper?
- Agisoft Metashape starts at $179/one-time and GraphHopper at On request.
- Does Agisoft Metashape or GraphHopper run on more platforms?
- Agisoft Metashape runs on Windows, macOS, Linux. GraphHopper runs on Web.
- What is Agisoft Metashape best used for?
- Agisoft Metashape is most often used for a survey or engineering firm processing high volumes of drone imagery that wants unlimited local processing instead of per-hectare cloud credits, a quarry or mine measuring stockpile volumes monthly, where the same flight is reprocessed repeatedly and cloud pricing by area is punitive, an archaeology or heritage team documenting sites on a capital grant with no recurring software budget to renew a subscription, a vfx or games studio scanning props and environments, where standard at $179 covers the whole requirement because georeferencing is irrelevant. Of those, a survey or engineering firm processing high volumes of drone imagery that wants unlimited local processing instead of per-hectare cloud credits and a quarry or mine measuring stockpile volumes monthly, where the same flight is reprocessed repeatedly and cloud pricing by area is punitive are not what GraphHopper is typically brought in for.
- What can Agisoft Metashape do that GraphHopper cannot?
- Agisoft Metashape covers Structure-from-motion alignment, Dense point cloud generation, Mesh and texture, Orthomosaic and DEM. GraphHopper covers Core Functionality, User Interface.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Agisoft Metashape: How much does Metashape cost?
Professional is $3,499 and Standard is $179, both node-locked. Floating licences are quoted through resellers.
GraphHopper: Is the free plan actually usable for production?
No. The free tier is limited to non-commercial use only and includes 500 daily credits. To use GraphHopper in production, you need a paid plan starting at 69 euros per month.
SourceAgisoft Metashape: Is it a subscription?
No. These are perpetual node-locked licences. Major version upgrades are charged separately.
GraphHopper: What happens if I exceed my daily credit limit?
The page does not specify. Each tier has a daily credit limit (500 for free, 5,000 for Basic, 15,000 for Standard, 50,000 for Premium), but no overage policy is documented.
SourceAgisoft Metashape: What is the difference between Standard and Professional?
Standard has no georeferencing, coordinate systems, ground control points, orthomosaic export or scripting. Anything survey or mapping related requires Professional.
GraphHopper: Does GraphHopper offer a trial period?
No. There is no trial period. You can start with the free plan to test, but commercial use requires a paid subscription.
SourceAgisoft Metashape: Does it process in the cloud?
No. All processing is local on your own hardware, which is the main reason it is cheap at volume and slow on weak machines.
GraphHopper: How much does the Premium plan cost and what do I get?
Premium is 479 euros per month and includes 50,000 daily credits, up to 200 locations per request, up to 20 vehicles, email and phone support, and access to all APIs including routing and optimization.
SourceAgisoft Metashape: Are there educational licences?
Yes, Agisoft offers reduced academic pricing on a separate page.
GraphHopper: Is there a discount if I link back to GraphHopper?
Yes. A 20% discount is available with proper attribution. The page also mentions a 99.5% uptime SLA on paid plans only.
SourceRelated pages
More on Agisoft Metashape
More on GraphHopper
Other head to heads
- Agisoft Metashape vs QGIS
- Agisoft Metashape vs Correlator3D
- Agisoft Metashape vs Global Mapper
- Agisoft Metashape vs Cesium ion
- Agisoft Metashape vs Potree
- Agisoft Metashape vs Leica Infinity
- Agisoft Metashape vs Emlid Studio
- Agisoft Metashape vs onX Maps
- Agisoft Metashape vs SW Maps
- Agisoft Metashape vs Fused
- Agisoft Metashape vs Lonboard
- Agisoft Metashape vs Trailforks
- Agisoft Metashape vs Atlas.co
- Agisoft Metashape vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- Agisoft Metashape vs Felt
- Agisoft Metashape vs Geographic Calculator
- Agisoft Metashape vs Google Maps Platform
- Agisoft Metashape vs Apple Maps
- Agisoft Metashape vs Mapbox
- Agisoft Metashape vs HERE Technologies
- Agisoft Metashape vs OSRM
- Agisoft Metashape vs Ride with GPS
- Agisoft Metashape vs Geoapify
- Agisoft Metashape vs LocationIQ
- Agisoft Metashape vs OpenRouteService
- Agisoft Metashape vs Stadia Maps
- Agisoft Metashape vs Bing Maps
- Agisoft Metashape vs GRASS GIS
- Agisoft Metashape vs MapTiler
- Agisoft Metashape vs WhiteboxTools
- GraphHopper vs QGIS
- GraphHopper vs Correlator3D
- GraphHopper vs Global Mapper
- GraphHopper vs Cesium ion
- GraphHopper vs Potree
- GraphHopper vs Leica Infinity
- GraphHopper vs Emlid Studio
- GraphHopper vs onX Maps
- GraphHopper vs SW Maps
- GraphHopper vs Fused
- GraphHopper vs Lonboard
- GraphHopper vs Trailforks
- GraphHopper vs Atlas.co
- GraphHopper vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- GraphHopper vs Felt
- GraphHopper vs Geographic Calculator
- GraphHopper vs Google Maps Platform
- GraphHopper vs Apple Maps
- GraphHopper vs Mapbox
- GraphHopper vs HERE Technologies
- GraphHopper vs OSRM
- GraphHopper vs Ride with GPS
- GraphHopper vs Geoapify
- GraphHopper vs LocationIQ
- GraphHopper vs OpenRouteService
- GraphHopper vs Stadia Maps
- GraphHopper vs Bing Maps
- GraphHopper vs GRASS GIS
- GraphHopper vs MapTiler
- GraphHopper vs WhiteboxTools
