Maps · head to head
GraphHopper vs MapQuest

GraphHopper
Maps
Open-source routing engine for road networks, providing fast route calculations, turn-by-turn navigation
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

MapQuest
Maps
Free driving directions, live traffic updates, and road conditions for trip planning and navigation
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: GraphHopper the free plan is non commercial use only; MapQuest subscription tiers cost more per transaction than the pay as you go rate at low volume, since $119 a month for 30,000 transactions is roughly $0.004 each against $0.0045 on demand
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GraphHopper and MapQuest actually diverge.
| Attribute | GraphHopper | MapQuest |
|---|
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (freemium), free tier (No), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GraphHopper
Nothing recorded that MapQuest does not also cover.
Only in MapQuest
Nothing recorded that GraphHopper does not also cover.
Both cover
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GraphHopper
- Routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an APInot MapQuest
- Map matching GPS traces and generating isochronesnot MapQuest
MapQuest
- Geocoding, routing and static maps over an APInot GraphHopper
- Adding directions and place search to an applicationnot GraphHopper
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GraphHopper
- The free plan is non commercial use only
- Free allows 500 credits a day, 5 locations per request and a single vehicle
- Request complexity is capped per plan, at 30 locations and 2 vehicles on Basic at 69 EUR a month, rising to 200 locations and 20 vehicles on Premium at 479 EUR
- Isochrone range is limited by plan, at 15 minutes on Basic and 30 on Premium
- Credits are a daily allowance, so a busy day cannot draw on a quiet one
MapQuest
- Subscription tiers cost more per transaction than the pay as you go rate at low volume, since $119 a month for 30,000 transactions is roughly $0.004 each against $0.0045 on demand
- The 50,000 free pay as you go transactions are described as available for a limited time rather than as a standing allowance
- Plan allowances are monthly and do not carry over
- Enterprise volume is custom priced
Pricing, plan by plan
GraphHopper
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the GraphHopper review.
MapQuest
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the MapQuest review.
Which should you pick?
Choose GraphHopper if
Nothing in the data separates GraphHopper from MapQuest on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Choose MapQuest if
Nothing in the data separates MapQuest from GraphHopper on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is GraphHopper or MapQuest better?
- Neither clearly leads. GraphHopper starts at On request and MapQuest at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GraphHopper or MapQuest?
- GraphHopper starts at On request and MapQuest at On request.
- Does GraphHopper or MapQuest run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is GraphHopper best used for?
- GraphHopper is most often used for routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an api, map matching gps traces and generating isochrones. Of those, routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an api and map matching gps traces and generating isochrones are not what MapQuest is typically brought in for.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
GraphHopper: Is the free plan actually usable for production?
No. The free tier is limited to non-commercial use only and includes 500 daily credits. To use GraphHopper in production, you need a paid plan starting at 69 euros per month.
SourceMapQuest: What is the cheapest way to use MapQuest APIs?
The MapQuestGO plan offers 50,000 free transactions for a limited time, then charges $0.0045 per transaction. Monthly subscription plans start at $119/month for 30,000 transactions.
SourceGraphHopper: What happens if I exceed my daily credit limit?
The page does not specify. Each tier has a daily credit limit (500 for free, 5,000 for Basic, 15,000 for Standard, 50,000 for Premium), but no overage policy is documented.
SourceMapQuest: Can I cache or store geocoding results on a monthly MapQuest plan?
No. Storing or caching geocodes is not allowed on monthly plans. Only Enterprise accounts can store geocodes off-map with the Extended Rights Geocoding feature.
SourceGraphHopper: Does GraphHopper offer a trial period?
No. There is no trial period. You can start with the free plan to test, but commercial use requires a paid subscription.
SourceMapQuest: What happens if I exceed my MapQuest monthly transaction limit?
The MapQuest pricing page does not specify overage charges. Users can modify their plan selection from their account dashboard at any time to scale up.
SourceGraphHopper: How much does the Premium plan cost and what do I get?
Premium is 479 euros per month and includes 50,000 daily credits, up to 200 locations per request, up to 20 vehicles, email and phone support, and access to all APIs including routing and optimization.
SourceMapQuest: Can I change my MapQuest plan mid-cycle?
Yes. Users can modify their plan selection from their account dashboard at any time, making it easy to scale as needs evolve.
SourceGraphHopper: Is there a discount if I link back to GraphHopper?
Yes. A 20% discount is available with proper attribution. The page also mentions a 99.5% uptime SLA on paid plans only.
SourceRelated pages
More on GraphHopper
Other head to heads
- GraphHopper vs Google Maps Platform
- GraphHopper vs Apple Maps
- GraphHopper vs Mapbox
- GraphHopper vs HERE Technologies
- GraphHopper vs OSRM
- GraphHopper vs Ride with GPS
- GraphHopper vs Geoapify
- GraphHopper vs LocationIQ
- GraphHopper vs OpenRouteService
- GraphHopper vs Stadia Maps
- GraphHopper vs Bing Maps
- GraphHopper vs GRASS GIS
- GraphHopper vs MapTiler
- GraphHopper vs onX Maps
- GraphHopper vs Potree
- GraphHopper vs SW Maps
- GraphHopper vs WhiteboxTools
- GraphHopper vs Agisoft Metashape
- GraphHopper vs Transit
- GraphHopper vs Trailforks
- GraphHopper vs Fused
- GraphHopper vs Mapillary
- GraphHopper vs Navmii GPS
- GraphHopper vs ArcGIS Survey123
- GraphHopper vs Gaia GPS
- GraphHopper vs IndoorAtlas
- GraphHopper vs HERE WeGo
- MapQuest vs Google Maps Platform
- MapQuest vs Apple Maps
- MapQuest vs Mapbox
- MapQuest vs HERE Technologies
- MapQuest vs OSRM
- MapQuest vs Ride with GPS
- MapQuest vs Geoapify
- MapQuest vs LocationIQ
- MapQuest vs OpenRouteService
- MapQuest vs Stadia Maps
- MapQuest vs Bing Maps
- MapQuest vs GRASS GIS
- MapQuest vs MapTiler
- MapQuest vs onX Maps
- MapQuest vs Potree
- MapQuest vs SW Maps
- MapQuest vs WhiteboxTools
- MapQuest vs Agisoft Metashape
- MapQuest vs Transit
- MapQuest vs Trailforks
- MapQuest vs Fused
- MapQuest vs Mapillary
- MapQuest vs Navmii GPS
- MapQuest vs ArcGIS Survey123
- MapQuest vs Gaia GPS
- MapQuest vs IndoorAtlas
- MapQuest vs HERE WeGo
