Softwr

Software · head to head

Google Maps Platform vs GraphHopper

Google Maps Platform logo

Google Maps Platform

Software

Comprehensive set of APIs and SDKs that allow developers to embed Google

From
On request
Rated
-
GraphHopper logo

GraphHopper

Software

Open-source routing engine for road networks, providing fast route calculations, turn-by-turn navigation

From
On request
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Google Maps Platform free allowances are per service rather than pooled, at 10,000 events a month for dynamic maps, geocoding and autocomplete; GraphHopper the free plan is non commercial use only

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Google Maps Platform and GraphHopper actually diverge.

Attributes where Google Maps Platform and GraphHopper differ
AttributeGoogle Maps PlatformGraphHopper
Founded2005Unknown

Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (freemium), free tier (No), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Google Maps Platform

Nothing recorded that GraphHopper does not also cover.

Only in GraphHopper

Nothing recorded that Google Maps Platform does not also cover.

Both cover

  • Core Functionality
  • User Interface

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Google Maps Platform

  • Embedding dynamic maps, Street View and photorealistic 3D tiles in an applicationnot GraphHopper
  • Route computation, navigation and fleet route optimisationnot GraphHopper
  • Geocoding, place autocomplete and address validationnot GraphHopper
  • Environmental data including weather, solar, air quality and pollennot GraphHopper
  • Geospatial analytics through Earth Enginenot GraphHopper

GraphHopper

  • Routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an APInot Google Maps Platform
  • Map matching GPS traces and generating isochronesnot Google Maps Platform

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Google Maps Platform

  • Free allowances are per service rather than pooled, at 10,000 events a month for dynamic maps, geocoding and autocomplete
  • Dynamic Maps cost $7.00 per 1,000 calls at the entry tier
  • Geocoding and the Directions API both cost $5.00 per 1,000 calls at the entry tier
  • Pricing is tiered by volume, so the effective unit price depends on total monthly usage and is hard to predict in advance
  • Billing is usage based with no flat plan, so a traffic spike is a cost spike

GraphHopper

  • The free plan is non commercial use only
  • Free allows 500 credits a day, 5 locations per request and a single vehicle
  • Request complexity is capped per plan, at 30 locations and 2 vehicles on Basic at 69 EUR a month, rising to 200 locations and 20 vehicles on Premium at 479 EUR
  • Isochrone range is limited by plan, at 15 minutes on Basic and 30 on Premium
  • Credits are a daily allowance, so a busy day cannot draw on a quiet one

Pricing, plan by plan

Google Maps Platform

On request

No published plan breakdown. See the Google Maps Platform review.

GraphHopper

On request

No published plan breakdown. See the GraphHopper review.

Which should you pick?

Choose Google Maps Platform if

Nothing in the data separates Google Maps Platform from GraphHopper on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.

Choose GraphHopper if

Nothing in the data separates GraphHopper from Google Maps Platform on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.

Questions people ask

Is Google Maps Platform or GraphHopper better?
Neither clearly leads. Google Maps Platform starts at On request and GraphHopper at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Google Maps Platform or GraphHopper?
Google Maps Platform starts at On request and GraphHopper at On request.
Does Google Maps Platform or GraphHopper run on more platforms?
Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
What is Google Maps Platform best used for?
Google Maps Platform is most often used for embedding dynamic maps, street view and photorealistic 3d tiles in an application, route computation, navigation and fleet route optimisation, geocoding, place autocomplete and address validation, environmental data including weather, solar, air quality and pollen. Of those, embedding dynamic maps, street view and photorealistic 3d tiles in an application and route computation, navigation and fleet route optimisation are not what GraphHopper is typically brought in for.

Related pages