Maps & Navigation · head to head
GraphHopper vs MAPS.ME

GraphHopper
Maps & Navigation
Open-source routing engine for road networks, providing fast route calculations, turn-by-turn navigation
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

MAPS.ME
Maps & Navigation
Free, offline maps application based on OpenStreetMap data
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only MAPS.ME has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: GraphHopper the free plan is non commercial use only; MAPS.ME mobile-only - no web or desktop navigation client
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GraphHopper and MAPS.ME actually diverge.
| Attribute | GraphHopper | MAPS.ME |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | freemium | Unknown |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web | iOS, Android |
| Founded | Unknown | 2011 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps & Navigation).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GraphHopper
Nothing recorded that MAPS.ME does not also cover.
Only in MAPS.ME
Nothing recorded that GraphHopper does not also cover.
Both cover
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GraphHopper
- Routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an APInot MAPS.ME
- Map matching GPS traces and generating isochronesnot MAPS.ME
MAPS.ME
- Downloading offline maps for travel without connectivitynot GraphHopper
- Turn-by-turn driving, walking, and cycling navigation without datanot GraphHopper
- Finding points of interest and hiking trailsnot GraphHopper
- Following built-in travel guidesnot GraphHopper
- Hotel booking via Booking.com integrationnot GraphHopper
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GraphHopper
- The free plan is non commercial use only
- Free allows 500 credits a day, 5 locations per request and a single vehicle
- Request complexity is capped per plan, at 30 locations and 2 vehicles on Basic at 69 EUR a month, rising to 200 locations and 20 vehicles on Premium at 479 EUR
- Isochrone range is limited by plan, at 15 minutes on Basic and 30 on Premium
- Credits are a daily allowance, so a busy day cannot draw on a quiet one
MAPS.ME
- Mobile-only - no web or desktop navigation client
- Free tier limits offline map downloads and shows monetization prompts
- No native Windows, macOS, or Linux app
- Map data comes from the OpenStreetMap community rather than a commercial map provider
Pricing, plan by plan
GraphHopper
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the GraphHopper review.
MAPS.ME
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the MAPS.ME review.
Which should you pick?
Choose GraphHopper if
Nothing in the data separates GraphHopper from MAPS.ME on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is GraphHopper or MAPS.ME better?
- Neither clearly leads. GraphHopper starts at On request and MAPS.ME at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GraphHopper or MAPS.ME?
- MAPS.ME has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for GraphHopper and Free for MAPS.ME.
- Does GraphHopper or MAPS.ME run on more platforms?
- GraphHopper runs on Web. MAPS.ME runs on iOS, Android.
- Can I use MAPS.ME for free?
- Yes. MAPS.ME has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. GraphHopper starts at On request.
- What is GraphHopper best used for?
- GraphHopper is most often used for routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an api, map matching gps traces and generating isochrones. Of those, routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an api and map matching gps traces and generating isochrones are not what MAPS.ME is typically brought in for.
Related pages
More on GraphHopper
Other head to heads
- GraphHopper vs Mapbox
- GraphHopper vs Google Maps Platform
- GraphHopper vs HERE Technologies
- GraphHopper vs Apple Maps
- GraphHopper vs Leaflet
- GraphHopper vs Esri ArcGIS
- GraphHopper vs CesiumJS
- GraphHopper vs Samsara
- GraphHopper vs Bing Maps
- GraphHopper vs CARTO
- GraphHopper vs Geotab
- GraphHopper vs HERE WeGo
- GraphHopper vs IndoorAtlas
- GraphHopper vs Mappedin
- GraphHopper vs Verizon Connect
- GraphHopper vs AllTrails
- GraphHopper vs Citymapper
- GraphHopper vs deck.gl
- MAPS.ME vs Mapbox
- MAPS.ME vs Google Maps Platform
- MAPS.ME vs HERE Technologies
- MAPS.ME vs Apple Maps
- MAPS.ME vs Leaflet
- MAPS.ME vs Esri ArcGIS
- MAPS.ME vs CesiumJS
- MAPS.ME vs Samsara
- MAPS.ME vs Bing Maps
- MAPS.ME vs CARTO
- MAPS.ME vs Geotab
- MAPS.ME vs HERE WeGo
- MAPS.ME vs IndoorAtlas
- MAPS.ME vs Mappedin
- MAPS.ME vs Verizon Connect
- MAPS.ME vs AllTrails
- MAPS.ME vs Citymapper
- MAPS.ME vs deck.gl
