Maps · head to head
GraphHopper vs MAPS.ME

GraphHopper
Maps
Open-source routing engine for road networks, providing fast route calculations, turn-by-turn navigation
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

MAPS.ME
Maps
Free, offline maps application based on OpenStreetMap data
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only MAPS.ME has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: GraphHopper the free plan is non commercial use only; MAPS.ME mobile-only - no web or desktop navigation client
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GraphHopper and MAPS.ME actually diverge.
| Attribute | GraphHopper | MAPS.ME |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | freemium | Unknown |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web | iOS, Android |
| Founded | Unknown | 2011 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GraphHopper
Nothing recorded that MAPS.ME does not also cover.
Only in MAPS.ME
Nothing recorded that GraphHopper does not also cover.
Both cover
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GraphHopper
- Routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an APInot MAPS.ME
- Map matching GPS traces and generating isochronesnot MAPS.ME
MAPS.ME
- Downloading offline maps for travel without connectivitynot GraphHopper
- Turn-by-turn driving, walking, and cycling navigation without datanot GraphHopper
- Finding points of interest and hiking trailsnot GraphHopper
- Following built-in travel guidesnot GraphHopper
- Hotel booking via Booking.com integrationnot GraphHopper
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GraphHopper
- The free plan is non commercial use only
- Free allows 500 credits a day, 5 locations per request and a single vehicle
- Request complexity is capped per plan, at 30 locations and 2 vehicles on Basic at 69 EUR a month, rising to 200 locations and 20 vehicles on Premium at 479 EUR
- Isochrone range is limited by plan, at 15 minutes on Basic and 30 on Premium
- Credits are a daily allowance, so a busy day cannot draw on a quiet one
MAPS.ME
- Mobile-only - no web or desktop navigation client
- Free tier limits offline map downloads and shows monetization prompts
- No native Windows, macOS, or Linux app
- Map data comes from the OpenStreetMap community rather than a commercial map provider
Pricing, plan by plan
GraphHopper
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the GraphHopper review.
MAPS.ME
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the MAPS.ME review.
Which should you pick?
Choose GraphHopper if
Nothing in the data separates GraphHopper from MAPS.ME on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is GraphHopper or MAPS.ME better?
- Neither clearly leads. GraphHopper starts at On request and MAPS.ME at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GraphHopper or MAPS.ME?
- MAPS.ME has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for GraphHopper and Free for MAPS.ME.
- Does GraphHopper or MAPS.ME run on more platforms?
- GraphHopper runs on Web. MAPS.ME runs on iOS, Android.
- Can I use MAPS.ME for free?
- Yes. MAPS.ME has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. GraphHopper starts at On request.
- What is GraphHopper best used for?
- GraphHopper is most often used for routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an api, map matching gps traces and generating isochrones. Of those, routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an api and map matching gps traces and generating isochrones are not what MAPS.ME is typically brought in for.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
GraphHopper: Is the free plan actually usable for production?
No. The free tier is limited to non-commercial use only and includes 500 daily credits. To use GraphHopper in production, you need a paid plan starting at 69 euros per month.
SourceMAPS.ME: Is MAPS.ME free to download and use?
MAPS.ME is available as a free download for both iOS via App Store and Android via Google Play. No pricing information is published on the MAPS.ME website, suggesting a free service model.
SourceGraphHopper: What happens if I exceed my daily credit limit?
The page does not specify. Each tier has a daily credit limit (500 for free, 5,000 for Basic, 15,000 for Standard, 50,000 for Premium), but no overage policy is documented.
SourceMAPS.ME: What features are included in MAPS.ME?
MAPS.ME is marketed as 'not just an app but a friend in all your adventures.' Full feature details require downloading the app from App Store or Google Play. Specific limitations or premium features are not disclosed on the website.
SourceGraphHopper: Does GraphHopper offer a trial period?
No. There is no trial period. You can start with the free plan to test, but commercial use requires a paid subscription.
SourceMAPS.ME: How does MAPS.ME make money if the app is free?
MAPS.ME does not publish pricing or monetization details on its website. The app is available free on both iOS and Android platforms, but the business model for generating revenue is not disclosed publicly.
SourceGraphHopper: How much does the Premium plan cost and what do I get?
Premium is 479 euros per month and includes 50,000 daily credits, up to 200 locations per request, up to 20 vehicles, email and phone support, and access to all APIs including routing and optimization.
SourceGraphHopper: Is there a discount if I link back to GraphHopper?
Yes. A 20% discount is available with proper attribution. The page also mentions a 99.5% uptime SLA on paid plans only.
SourceRelated pages
More on GraphHopper
Other head to heads
- GraphHopper vs Google Maps Platform
- GraphHopper vs Apple Maps
- GraphHopper vs Mapbox
- GraphHopper vs HERE Technologies
- GraphHopper vs OSRM
- GraphHopper vs Ride with GPS
- GraphHopper vs Geoapify
- GraphHopper vs LocationIQ
- GraphHopper vs OpenRouteService
- GraphHopper vs Stadia Maps
- GraphHopper vs Bing Maps
- GraphHopper vs GRASS GIS
- GraphHopper vs MapTiler
- GraphHopper vs onX Maps
- GraphHopper vs Potree
- GraphHopper vs SW Maps
- GraphHopper vs WhiteboxTools
- GraphHopper vs Agisoft Metashape
- GraphHopper vs OsmAnd
- GraphHopper vs Navmii GPS
- GraphHopper vs OpenStreetMap
- GraphHopper vs QGIS
- GraphHopper vs AllTrails
- GraphHopper vs Citymapper
- GraphHopper vs Mappedin
- MAPS.ME vs Google Maps Platform
- MAPS.ME vs Apple Maps
- MAPS.ME vs Mapbox
- MAPS.ME vs HERE Technologies
- MAPS.ME vs OSRM
- MAPS.ME vs Ride with GPS
- MAPS.ME vs Geoapify
- MAPS.ME vs LocationIQ
- MAPS.ME vs OpenRouteService
- MAPS.ME vs Stadia Maps
- MAPS.ME vs Bing Maps
- MAPS.ME vs GRASS GIS
- MAPS.ME vs MapTiler
- MAPS.ME vs onX Maps
- MAPS.ME vs Potree
- MAPS.ME vs SW Maps
- MAPS.ME vs WhiteboxTools
- MAPS.ME vs Agisoft Metashape
- MAPS.ME vs OsmAnd
- MAPS.ME vs Navmii GPS
- MAPS.ME vs OpenStreetMap
- MAPS.ME vs QGIS
- MAPS.ME vs AllTrails
- MAPS.ME vs Citymapper
- MAPS.ME vs Mappedin
