Softwr

Maps & Navigation · head to head

GraphHopper vs MAPS.ME

GraphHopper logo

GraphHopper

Maps & Navigation

Open-source routing engine for road networks, providing fast route calculations, turn-by-turn navigation

From
On request
Rated
-
MAPS.ME logo

MAPS.ME

Maps & Navigation

Free, offline maps application based on OpenStreetMap data

From
Free
Rated
-

The short version

  • Only MAPS.ME has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • Each has a real cost: GraphHopper the free plan is non commercial use only; MAPS.ME mobile-only - no web or desktop navigation client

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which GraphHopper and MAPS.ME actually diverge.

Attributes where GraphHopper and MAPS.ME differ
AttributeGraphHopperMAPS.ME
Starting priceOn requestFree
Pricing modelfreemiumUnknown
Free tierNoYes
PlatformsWebiOS, Android
FoundedUnknown2011

Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps & Navigation).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in GraphHopper

Nothing recorded that MAPS.ME does not also cover.

Only in MAPS.ME

Nothing recorded that GraphHopper does not also cover.

Both cover

  • Core Functionality
  • User Interface

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

GraphHopper

  • Routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an APInot MAPS.ME
  • Map matching GPS traces and generating isochronesnot MAPS.ME

MAPS.ME

  • Downloading offline maps for travel without connectivitynot GraphHopper
  • Turn-by-turn driving, walking, and cycling navigation without datanot GraphHopper
  • Finding points of interest and hiking trailsnot GraphHopper
  • Following built-in travel guidesnot GraphHopper
  • Hotel booking via Booking.com integrationnot GraphHopper

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

GraphHopper

  • The free plan is non commercial use only
  • Free allows 500 credits a day, 5 locations per request and a single vehicle
  • Request complexity is capped per plan, at 30 locations and 2 vehicles on Basic at 69 EUR a month, rising to 200 locations and 20 vehicles on Premium at 479 EUR
  • Isochrone range is limited by plan, at 15 minutes on Basic and 30 on Premium
  • Credits are a daily allowance, so a busy day cannot draw on a quiet one

MAPS.ME

  • Mobile-only - no web or desktop navigation client
  • Free tier limits offline map downloads and shows monetization prompts
  • No native Windows, macOS, or Linux app
  • Map data comes from the OpenStreetMap community rather than a commercial map provider

Pricing, plan by plan

GraphHopper

On request

No published plan breakdown. See the GraphHopper review.

MAPS.ME

Free

No published plan breakdown. See the MAPS.ME review.

Which should you pick?

Choose GraphHopper if

Nothing in the data separates GraphHopper from MAPS.ME on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.

Choose MAPS.ME if

  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on iOS, Android.

Questions people ask

Is GraphHopper or MAPS.ME better?
Neither clearly leads. GraphHopper starts at On request and MAPS.ME at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, GraphHopper or MAPS.ME?
MAPS.ME has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for GraphHopper and Free for MAPS.ME.
Does GraphHopper or MAPS.ME run on more platforms?
GraphHopper runs on Web. MAPS.ME runs on iOS, Android.
Can I use MAPS.ME for free?
Yes. MAPS.ME has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. GraphHopper starts at On request.
What is GraphHopper best used for?
GraphHopper is most often used for routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an api, map matching gps traces and generating isochrones. Of those, routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an api and map matching gps traces and generating isochrones are not what MAPS.ME is typically brought in for.

Related pages

Other head to heads