Maps · head to head
GraphHopper vs QGIS

GraphHopper
Maps
Open-source routing engine for road networks, providing fast route calculations, turn-by-turn navigation
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
QGIS
Maps
Free, open-source desktop GIS application that supports viewing, editing, and analysis of
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: GraphHopper the free plan is non commercial use only; QGIS requires technical knowledge to use effectively for advanced GIS analysis
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GraphHopper and QGIS actually diverge.
| Attribute | GraphHopper | QGIS |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web | Windows, macOS, Linux |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (freemium), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GraphHopper
Nothing recorded that QGIS does not also cover.
Only in QGIS
Nothing recorded that GraphHopper does not also cover.
Both cover
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GraphHopper
- Routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an APInot QGIS
- Map matching GPS traces and generating isochronesnot QGIS
QGIS
- Creating thematic maps showing population density by regionnot GraphHopper
- Digitizing building footprints from satellite imagery for urban planningnot GraphHopper
- Analyzing proximity of retail stores to competitor locationsnot GraphHopper
- Performing spatial analysis of wildlife habitat suitabilitynot GraphHopper
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GraphHopper
- The free plan is non commercial use only
- Free allows 500 credits a day, 5 locations per request and a single vehicle
- Request complexity is capped per plan, at 30 locations and 2 vehicles on Basic at 69 EUR a month, rising to 200 locations and 20 vehicles on Premium at 479 EUR
- Isochrone range is limited by plan, at 15 minutes on Basic and 30 on Premium
- Credits are a daily allowance, so a busy day cannot draw on a quiet one
QGIS
- Requires technical knowledge to use effectively for advanced GIS analysis
- Desktop application does not include built-in web publishing capabilities
Pricing, plan by plan
GraphHopper
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the GraphHopper review.
QGIS
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the QGIS review.
Which should you pick?
Choose GraphHopper if
Nothing in the data separates GraphHopper from QGIS on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is GraphHopper or QGIS better?
- Neither clearly leads. GraphHopper starts at On request and QGIS at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GraphHopper or QGIS?
- GraphHopper starts at On request and QGIS at On request.
- Does GraphHopper or QGIS run on more platforms?
- GraphHopper runs on Web. QGIS runs on Windows, macOS, Linux.
- What is GraphHopper best used for?
- GraphHopper is most often used for routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an api, map matching gps traces and generating isochrones. Of those, routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an api and map matching gps traces and generating isochrones are not what QGIS is typically brought in for.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
GraphHopper: Is the free plan actually usable for production?
No. The free tier is limited to non-commercial use only and includes 500 daily credits. To use GraphHopper in production, you need a paid plan starting at 69 euros per month.
SourceQGIS: Is QGIS free and open source?
Yes. QGIS is free and open-source software, licensed under the GNU General Public License, available for download and modification by anyone.
SourceGraphHopper: What happens if I exceed my daily credit limit?
The page does not specify. Each tier has a daily credit limit (500 for free, 5,000 for Basic, 15,000 for Standard, 50,000 for Premium), but no overage policy is documented.
SourceQGIS: What operating systems does QGIS support?
QGIS runs on Windows, macOS, and Linux, with installers available for each platform.
SourceGraphHopper: Does GraphHopper offer a trial period?
No. There is no trial period. You can start with the free plan to test, but commercial use requires a paid subscription.
SourceGraphHopper: How much does the Premium plan cost and what do I get?
Premium is 479 euros per month and includes 50,000 daily credits, up to 200 locations per request, up to 20 vehicles, email and phone support, and access to all APIs including routing and optimization.
SourceGraphHopper: Is there a discount if I link back to GraphHopper?
Yes. A 20% discount is available with proper attribution. The page also mentions a 99.5% uptime SLA on paid plans only.
SourceRelated pages
More on GraphHopper
Other head to heads
- GraphHopper vs Google Maps Platform
- GraphHopper vs Apple Maps
- GraphHopper vs Mapbox
- GraphHopper vs HERE Technologies
- GraphHopper vs OSRM
- GraphHopper vs Ride with GPS
- GraphHopper vs Geoapify
- GraphHopper vs LocationIQ
- GraphHopper vs OpenRouteService
- GraphHopper vs Stadia Maps
- GraphHopper vs Bing Maps
- GraphHopper vs GRASS GIS
- GraphHopper vs MapTiler
- GraphHopper vs onX Maps
- GraphHopper vs Potree
- GraphHopper vs SW Maps
- GraphHopper vs WhiteboxTools
- GraphHopper vs Agisoft Metashape
- GraphHopper vs Global Mapper
- GraphHopper vs SAGA GIS
- GraphHopper vs CesiumJS
- GraphHopper vs Atlas.co
- GraphHopper vs Emlid Studio
- GraphHopper vs Leaflet
- GraphHopper vs ArcGIS Survey123
- GraphHopper vs Foursquare Places API
- GraphHopper vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- GraphHopper vs Fused
- GraphHopper vs Google Maps
- GraphHopper vs Leica Infinity
- QGIS vs Google Maps Platform
- QGIS vs Apple Maps
- QGIS vs Mapbox
- QGIS vs HERE Technologies
- QGIS vs OSRM
- QGIS vs Ride with GPS
- QGIS vs Geoapify
- QGIS vs LocationIQ
- QGIS vs OpenRouteService
- QGIS vs Stadia Maps
- QGIS vs Bing Maps
- QGIS vs GRASS GIS
- QGIS vs MapTiler
- QGIS vs onX Maps
- QGIS vs Potree
- QGIS vs SW Maps
- QGIS vs WhiteboxTools
- QGIS vs Agisoft Metashape
- QGIS vs Global Mapper
- QGIS vs SAGA GIS
- QGIS vs CesiumJS
- QGIS vs Atlas.co
- QGIS vs Emlid Studio
- QGIS vs Leaflet
- QGIS vs ArcGIS Survey123
- QGIS vs Foursquare Places API
- QGIS vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- QGIS vs Fused
- QGIS vs Google Maps
- QGIS vs Leica Infinity
