Maps · head to head
GraphHopper vs Waze

GraphHopper
Maps
Open-source routing engine for road networks, providing fast route calculations, turn-by-turn navigation
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Waze
Maps
Community-driven GPS navigation app that uses real-time traffic data from its users
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Waze has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: GraphHopper the free plan is non commercial use only; Waze no offline maps capability, requiring constant internet connectivity
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GraphHopper and Waze actually diverge.
| Attribute | GraphHopper | Waze |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | freemium | free |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web | iOS, Android, Web |
| Founded | Unknown | 2008 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GraphHopper
Nothing recorded that Waze does not also cover.
Only in Waze
Nothing recorded that GraphHopper does not also cover.
Both cover
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GraphHopper
- Routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an APInot Waze
- Map matching GPS traces and generating isochronesnot Waze
Waze
- Real-time navigation and route planning with live traffic updatesnot GraphHopper
- Reporting hazards and roadway conditions to community driversnot GraphHopper
- Finding alternative routes to avoid congestion and accidentsnot GraphHopper
- Connecting with first responders and emergency servicesnot GraphHopper
- Community-driven mapping and road condition improvementsnot GraphHopper
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GraphHopper
- The free plan is non commercial use only
- Free allows 500 credits a day, 5 locations per request and a single vehicle
- Request complexity is capped per plan, at 30 locations and 2 vehicles on Basic at 69 EUR a month, rising to 200 locations and 20 vehicles on Premium at 479 EUR
- Isochrone range is limited by plan, at 15 minutes on Basic and 30 on Premium
- Credits are a daily allowance, so a busy day cannot draw on a quiet one
Waze
- No offline maps capability, requiring constant internet connectivity
- Routing reliability declined with reports of longer routes and restricted road directions
- Privacy concerns with location data collection and location-based ads after Google acquisition
- Stability issues including crashes on CarPlay and slow loading times
Pricing, plan by plan
GraphHopper
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the GraphHopper review.
Waze
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Waze review.
Which should you pick?
Choose GraphHopper if
Nothing in the data separates GraphHopper from Waze on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is GraphHopper or Waze better?
- Neither clearly leads. GraphHopper starts at On request and Waze at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GraphHopper or Waze?
- Waze has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for GraphHopper and Free for Waze.
- Does GraphHopper or Waze run on more platforms?
- GraphHopper runs on Web. Waze runs on iOS, Android, Web.
- Can I use Waze for free?
- Yes. Waze has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. GraphHopper starts at On request.
- What is GraphHopper best used for?
- GraphHopper is most often used for routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an api, map matching gps traces and generating isochrones. Of those, routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an api and map matching gps traces and generating isochrones are not what Waze is typically brought in for.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
GraphHopper: Is the free plan actually usable for production?
No. The free tier is limited to non-commercial use only and includes 500 daily credits. To use GraphHopper in production, you need a paid plan starting at 69 euros per month.
SourceWaze: Does Waze work offline?
No, Waze relies on real-time data and does not support offline maps, limiting usability when without internet connectivity.
SourceGraphHopper: What happens if I exceed my daily credit limit?
The page does not specify. Each tier has a daily credit limit (500 for free, 5,000 for Basic, 15,000 for Standard, 50,000 for Premium), but no overage policy is documented.
SourceWaze: How does Waze handle my location data?
Since Google's 2013 acquisition, Waze shares location history with Google's ad network and serves location-based ads. This differs from privacy-focused alternatives like Apple Maps.
SourceGraphHopper: Does GraphHopper offer a trial period?
No. There is no trial period. You can start with the free plan to test, but commercial use requires a paid subscription.
SourceWaze: What platforms can I use Waze on?
Waze is available on iOS and Android mobile apps, and via web through the Live Map feature accessible from any computer or tablet.
SourceGraphHopper: How much does the Premium plan cost and what do I get?
Premium is 479 euros per month and includes 50,000 daily credits, up to 200 locations per request, up to 20 vehicles, email and phone support, and access to all APIs including routing and optimization.
SourceGraphHopper: Is there a discount if I link back to GraphHopper?
Yes. A 20% discount is available with proper attribution. The page also mentions a 99.5% uptime SLA on paid plans only.
SourceRelated pages
More on GraphHopper
Other head to heads
- GraphHopper vs Google Maps Platform
- GraphHopper vs Apple Maps
- GraphHopper vs Mapbox
- GraphHopper vs HERE Technologies
- GraphHopper vs OSRM
- GraphHopper vs Ride with GPS
- GraphHopper vs Geoapify
- GraphHopper vs LocationIQ
- GraphHopper vs OpenRouteService
- GraphHopper vs Stadia Maps
- GraphHopper vs Bing Maps
- GraphHopper vs GRASS GIS
- GraphHopper vs MapTiler
- GraphHopper vs onX Maps
- GraphHopper vs Potree
- GraphHopper vs SW Maps
- GraphHopper vs WhiteboxTools
- GraphHopper vs Agisoft Metashape
- GraphHopper vs HERE WeGo
- GraphHopper vs Navmii GPS
- GraphHopper vs TomTom Developer Portal
- GraphHopper vs Citymapper
- GraphHopper vs Felt
- GraphHopper vs Transit
- GraphHopper vs Trailforks
- GraphHopper vs ArcGIS Survey123
- GraphHopper vs Mappedin
- Waze vs Google Maps Platform
- Waze vs Apple Maps
- Waze vs Mapbox
- Waze vs HERE Technologies
- Waze vs OSRM
- Waze vs Ride with GPS
- Waze vs Geoapify
- Waze vs LocationIQ
- Waze vs OpenRouteService
- Waze vs Stadia Maps
- Waze vs Bing Maps
- Waze vs GRASS GIS
- Waze vs MapTiler
- Waze vs onX Maps
- Waze vs Potree
- Waze vs SW Maps
- Waze vs WhiteboxTools
- Waze vs Agisoft Metashape
- Waze vs HERE WeGo
- Waze vs Navmii GPS
- Waze vs TomTom Developer Portal
- Waze vs Citymapper
- Waze vs Felt
- Waze vs Transit
- Waze vs Trailforks
- Waze vs ArcGIS Survey123
- Waze vs Mappedin
