Maps · head to head
GraphHopper vs OpenLayers

GraphHopper
Maps
Open-source routing engine for road networks, providing fast route calculations, turn-by-turn navigation
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

OpenLayers
Maps
High-performance, feature-packed JavaScript library for creating interactive maps on the web with
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only OpenLayers has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: GraphHopper the free plan is non commercial use only; OpenLayers no commercial support included; community-driven library
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GraphHopper and OpenLayers actually diverge.
| Attribute | GraphHopper | OpenLayers |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | freemium | open-source |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
Identical on both: platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GraphHopper
Nothing recorded that OpenLayers does not also cover.
Only in OpenLayers
Nothing recorded that GraphHopper does not also cover.
Both cover
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GraphHopper
- Routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an APInot OpenLayers
- Map matching GPS traces and generating isochronesnot OpenLayers
OpenLayers
- Embedding interactive maps showing store locations on retail websitesnot GraphHopper
- Visualizing GPS tracking data for delivery routes on web dashboardsnot GraphHopper
- Creating choropleth maps displaying regional sales performancenot GraphHopper
- Building mapping interfaces for real estate property searchesnot GraphHopper
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GraphHopper
- The free plan is non commercial use only
- Free allows 500 credits a day, 5 locations per request and a single vehicle
- Request complexity is capped per plan, at 30 locations and 2 vehicles on Basic at 69 EUR a month, rising to 200 locations and 20 vehicles on Premium at 479 EUR
- Isochrone range is limited by plan, at 15 minutes on Basic and 30 on Premium
- Credits are a daily allowance, so a busy day cannot draw on a quiet one
OpenLayers
- No commercial support included; community-driven library
Pricing, plan by plan
GraphHopper
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the GraphHopper review.
OpenLayers
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the OpenLayers review.
Which should you pick?
Choose GraphHopper if
Nothing in the data separates GraphHopper from OpenLayers on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is GraphHopper or OpenLayers better?
- Neither clearly leads. GraphHopper starts at On request and OpenLayers at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GraphHopper or OpenLayers?
- OpenLayers has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for GraphHopper and Free for OpenLayers.
- Does GraphHopper or OpenLayers run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use OpenLayers for free?
- Yes. OpenLayers has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. GraphHopper starts at On request.
- What is GraphHopper best used for?
- GraphHopper is most often used for routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an api, map matching gps traces and generating isochrones. Of those, routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an api and map matching gps traces and generating isochrones are not what OpenLayers is typically brought in for.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
GraphHopper: Is the free plan actually usable for production?
No. The free tier is limited to non-commercial use only and includes 500 daily credits. To use GraphHopper in production, you need a paid plan starting at 69 euros per month.
SourceOpenLayers: How much does OpenLayers cost?
OpenLayers is completely free, open source JavaScript library released under the 2-clause BSD License (FreeBSD License) with no cost for use, modification, or distribution.
SourceGraphHopper: What happens if I exceed my daily credit limit?
The page does not specify. Each tier has a daily credit limit (500 for free, 5,000 for Basic, 15,000 for Standard, 50,000 for Premium), but no overage policy is documented.
SourceOpenLayers: What license does OpenLayers use?
OpenLayers is released under the 2-clause BSD License (also known as the FreeBSD License), allowing free use, modification, and distribution.
SourceGraphHopper: Does GraphHopper offer a trial period?
No. There is no trial period. You can start with the free plan to test, but commercial use requires a paid subscription.
SourceOpenLayers: Can I use OpenLayers commercially?
Yes, OpenLayers is free to use commercially without any licensing fees. The open source license permits commercial use without restriction.
SourceGraphHopper: How much does the Premium plan cost and what do I get?
Premium is 479 euros per month and includes 50,000 daily credits, up to 200 locations per request, up to 20 vehicles, email and phone support, and access to all APIs including routing and optimization.
SourceGraphHopper: Is there a discount if I link back to GraphHopper?
Yes. A 20% discount is available with proper attribution. The page also mentions a 99.5% uptime SLA on paid plans only.
SourceRelated pages
More on GraphHopper
Other head to heads
- GraphHopper vs Google Maps Platform
- GraphHopper vs Apple Maps
- GraphHopper vs Mapbox
- GraphHopper vs HERE Technologies
- GraphHopper vs OSRM
- GraphHopper vs Ride with GPS
- GraphHopper vs Geoapify
- GraphHopper vs LocationIQ
- GraphHopper vs OpenRouteService
- GraphHopper vs Stadia Maps
- GraphHopper vs Bing Maps
- GraphHopper vs GRASS GIS
- GraphHopper vs MapTiler
- GraphHopper vs onX Maps
- GraphHopper vs Potree
- GraphHopper vs SW Maps
- GraphHopper vs WhiteboxTools
- GraphHopper vs Agisoft Metashape
- GraphHopper vs CesiumJS
- GraphHopper vs Leaflet
- GraphHopper vs QGIS
- GraphHopper vs Trailforks
- GraphHopper vs Gaia GPS
- GraphHopper vs Mapzen
- GraphHopper vs Navmii GPS
- GraphHopper vs Nominatim
- GraphHopper vs OpenStreetMap
- GraphHopper vs OsmAnd
- OpenLayers vs Google Maps Platform
- OpenLayers vs Apple Maps
- OpenLayers vs Mapbox
- OpenLayers vs HERE Technologies
- OpenLayers vs OSRM
- OpenLayers vs Ride with GPS
- OpenLayers vs Geoapify
- OpenLayers vs LocationIQ
- OpenLayers vs OpenRouteService
- OpenLayers vs Stadia Maps
- OpenLayers vs Bing Maps
- OpenLayers vs GRASS GIS
- OpenLayers vs MapTiler
- OpenLayers vs onX Maps
- OpenLayers vs Potree
- OpenLayers vs SW Maps
- OpenLayers vs WhiteboxTools
- OpenLayers vs Agisoft Metashape
- OpenLayers vs CesiumJS
- OpenLayers vs Leaflet
- OpenLayers vs QGIS
- OpenLayers vs Trailforks
- OpenLayers vs Gaia GPS
- OpenLayers vs Mapzen
- OpenLayers vs Navmii GPS
- OpenLayers vs Nominatim
- OpenLayers vs OpenStreetMap
- OpenLayers vs OsmAnd
