Software · head to head
GraphHopper vs Kepler.gl

GraphHopper
Software
Open-source routing engine for road networks, providing fast route calculations, turn-by-turn navigation
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Kepler.gl
Software
Powerful open-source geospatial analysis tool for large-scale datasets, enabling beautiful data visualizations without coding
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: GraphHopper the free plan is non commercial use only; Kepler.gl kepler.gl is a free open source library with no vendor-sold edition; confirmed by the absence of any App Store, marketplace or G-Cloud listing, support is limited to community GitHub issues rather than a purchased SLA.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GraphHopper and Kepler.gl actually diverge.
| Attribute | GraphHopper | Kepler.gl |
|---|
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (freemium), free tier (No), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GraphHopper
Nothing recorded that Kepler.gl does not also cover.
Only in Kepler.gl
Nothing recorded that GraphHopper does not also cover.
Both cover
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GraphHopper
- Routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an APInot Kepler.gl
- Map matching GPS traces and generating isochronesnot Kepler.gl
Kepler.gl
No use cases recorded yet. See the Kepler.gl review.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GraphHopper
- The free plan is non commercial use only
- Free allows 500 credits a day, 5 locations per request and a single vehicle
- Request complexity is capped per plan, at 30 locations and 2 vehicles on Basic at 69 EUR a month, rising to 200 locations and 20 vehicles on Premium at 479 EUR
- Isochrone range is limited by plan, at 15 minutes on Basic and 30 on Premium
- Credits are a daily allowance, so a busy day cannot draw on a quiet one
Kepler.gl
- Kepler.gl is a free open source library with no vendor-sold edition; confirmed by the absence of any App Store, marketplace or G-Cloud listing, support is limited to community GitHub issues rather than a purchased SLA.
Pricing, plan by plan
GraphHopper
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the GraphHopper review.
Kepler.gl
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Kepler.gl review.
Which should you pick?
Choose GraphHopper if
Nothing in the data separates GraphHopper from Kepler.gl on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Choose Kepler.gl if
Nothing in the data separates Kepler.gl from GraphHopper on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is GraphHopper or Kepler.gl better?
- Neither clearly leads. GraphHopper starts at On request and Kepler.gl at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GraphHopper or Kepler.gl?
- GraphHopper starts at On request and Kepler.gl at On request.
- Does GraphHopper or Kepler.gl run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is GraphHopper best used for?
- GraphHopper is most often used for routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an api, map matching gps traces and generating isochrones. Of those, routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an api and map matching gps traces and generating isochrones are not what Kepler.gl is typically brought in for.
Related pages
More on GraphHopper
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- GraphHopper vs Mapbox
- GraphHopper vs Google Maps Platform
- GraphHopper vs HERE Technologies
- GraphHopper vs Apple Maps
- GraphHopper vs Leaflet
- GraphHopper vs Esri ArcGIS
- GraphHopper vs CesiumJS
- GraphHopper vs Samsara
- GraphHopper vs Bing Maps
- GraphHopper vs CARTO
- GraphHopper vs Geotab
- GraphHopper vs HERE WeGo
- GraphHopper vs IndoorAtlas
- GraphHopper vs Mappedin
- GraphHopper vs Verizon Connect
- GraphHopper vs AllTrails
- GraphHopper vs Citymapper
- GraphHopper vs deck.gl
- Kepler.gl vs Mapbox
- Kepler.gl vs Google Maps Platform
- Kepler.gl vs HERE Technologies
- Kepler.gl vs Apple Maps
- Kepler.gl vs Leaflet
- Kepler.gl vs Esri ArcGIS
- Kepler.gl vs CesiumJS
- Kepler.gl vs Samsara
- Kepler.gl vs Bing Maps
- Kepler.gl vs CARTO
- Kepler.gl vs Geotab
- Kepler.gl vs HERE WeGo
- Kepler.gl vs IndoorAtlas
- Kepler.gl vs Mappedin
- Kepler.gl vs Verizon Connect
- Kepler.gl vs AllTrails
- Kepler.gl vs Citymapper
- Kepler.gl vs deck.gl
