Fleet Management · head to head
NexTraq vs Trailforks

NexTraq
Fleet Management
US small-fleet telematics now absorbed into Michelin Connected Fleet
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

Trailforks
Maps
Mountain-bike-specific trail database and navigation app owned by Outside Inc
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only Trailforks has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: NexTraq the NexTraq brand has been absorbed into Michelin Connected Fleet, so the product name, the account team and eventually the platform underneath you are all subject to a consolidation plan you have no say in.; Trailforks the free tier only allows one offline region downloaded at a time, which is limiting for a rider visiting multiple trail areas.
- They diverge on capability: NexTraq covers Vehicle tracking, Trailforks covers Mountain bike trail database.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which NexTraq and Trailforks actually diverge.
| Attribute | NexTraq | Trailforks |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | Freemium, standalone Pro or bundled with Outside+ |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | iOS, Android, Web |
| Category | Fleet Management | Maps |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in NexTraq
- Vehicle tracking
- Hours of service
- Fuel and idling reporting
- Maintenance scheduling
- Job dispatch
- Driver scorecards
Only in Trailforks
- Mountain bike trail database
- Community trail reports
- Offline maps
- Premium basemaps
- Heatmap overlay
- Weather and fire overlays
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
NexTraq
- A North American trades or field service fleet that wants tracking, dispatch and ELD compliance from one mid-market vendornot Trailforks
- An operator already buying Michelin tyres and fleet services that can negotiate telematics into a wider commercial agreementnot Trailforks
- A fleet replacing an ageing tracking system that values an owner with a large corporate balance sheet over a venture-funded challengernot Trailforks
- A distribution business needing straightforward fuel and idling reporting to justify a driver behaviour programmenot Trailforks
Trailforks
- A mountain biker planning a ride on unfamiliar singletrack who needs direction-of-travel and difficulty datanot NexTraq
- Someone riding in an area with no signal who needs an offline downloaded trail mapnot NexTraq
- A rider checking recent community trail condition reports before heading outnot NexTraq
- Someone comparing several mountain bike regions using the usage heatmap before choosing where to ridenot NexTraq
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
NexTraq
- The NexTraq brand has been absorbed into Michelin Connected Fleet, so the product name, the account team and eventually the platform underneath you are all subject to a consolidation plan you have no say in.
- Michelin is merging three separately engineered telematics products, which historically means feature freezes on the older platforms and a migration that existing customers pay for in disruption rather than cash.
- The feature set is mid-market and unexceptional, so it rarely wins a technical evaluation against Geotab or Samsara on capability alone.
- Contracts bundle hardware into multi-year terms, so a fleet that shrinks or is acquired continues paying for devices, and early exit triggers hardware recovery costs.
- The integration ecosystem is small and the API is not a selling point, so connecting telematics data to job costing or payroll usually means custom work or scheduled file exports.
Trailforks
- The free tier only allows one offline region downloaded at a time, which is limiting for a rider visiting multiple trail areas.
- Pro pricing appears to be shifting toward bundling with the wider Outside+ media subscription, making the standalone price less stable and worth checking directly before buying.
- Its focus on mountain biking means it is a weaker choice than Ride with GPS for road or gravel route planning.
- Trail data quality depends on community contribution, so newer or less-ridden regions can have sparse or outdated information.
- Being owned by a media company with a broader outdoor content bundle strategy introduces some uncertainty about how the standalone app product is prioritised long term.
Pricing, plan by plan
NexTraq
On request- NexTraq$undefined/year
- Per vehicle subscription with hardware bundled into the term
- Multi-year agreements are standard
- ELD and dispatch modules priced as tiers
Trailforks
Free- Trailforks FreeFree
- Trail database access
- Basic basemaps
- One offline region at a time
- Trailforks Pro$undefined/year
- Unlimited offline regions
- Premium basemaps including Gaia and ArcGIS satellite
- Heatmap, weather and fire overlays
Which should you pick?
Choose NexTraq if
- You need vehicle tracking.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want hours of service.
Choose Trailforks if
- You need mountain bike trail database.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on iOS, Android, Web.
- You also want community trail reports.
Questions people ask
- Is NexTraq or Trailforks better?
- Neither clearly leads. NexTraq starts at On request and Trailforks at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, NexTraq or Trailforks?
- Trailforks has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for NexTraq and Free for Trailforks.
- Does NexTraq or Trailforks run on more platforms?
- NexTraq runs on Web, iOS, Android. Trailforks runs on iOS, Android, Web.
- Can I use Trailforks for free?
- Yes. Trailforks has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. NexTraq starts at On request.
- What is NexTraq best used for?
- NexTraq is most often used for a north american trades or field service fleet that wants tracking, dispatch and eld compliance from one mid-market vendor, an operator already buying michelin tyres and fleet services that can negotiate telematics into a wider commercial agreement, a fleet replacing an ageing tracking system that values an owner with a large corporate balance sheet over a venture-funded challenger, a distribution business needing straightforward fuel and idling reporting to justify a driver behaviour programme. Of those, a north american trades or field service fleet that wants tracking, dispatch and eld compliance from one mid-market vendor and an operator already buying michelin tyres and fleet services that can negotiate telematics into a wider commercial agreement are not what Trailforks is typically brought in for.
- What can NexTraq do that Trailforks cannot?
- NexTraq covers Vehicle tracking, Hours of service, Fuel and idling reporting, Maintenance scheduling. Trailforks covers Mountain bike trail database, Community trail reports, Offline maps, Premium basemaps.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
NexTraq: Is NexTraq still a separate company?
No. Michelin bought it in 2017 and has folded it into Michelin Connected Fleet, together with Masternaut in Europe and Sascar in Brazil.
Trailforks: Is Trailforks free?
A free tier exists with trail data and one offline region at a time; Pro removes that limit and adds premium map layers.
NexTraq: Will my NexTraq system be migrated to a different platform?
Assume so, eventually. Ask directly what the migration timetable is, what happens to historical data, and who bears the cost of re-fitting or re-configuring devices.
Trailforks: Who owns Trailforks?
Outside Inc, which also owns Pinkbike and CyclingTips, acquired it in 2021.
NexTraq: Does buying Michelin tyres get me a better telematics price?
It is worth testing. The commercial logic of the acquisition is bundling vehicle services, and that is where discounting is most likely to be available.
Trailforks: Is it only for mountain biking?
Mountain biking is the core focus, though it has secondary support for hiking, gravel and motorised trail use.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- NexTraq vs Geotab
- NexTraq vs Verizon Connect
- NexTraq vs Azuga
- NexTraq vs Samsara
- NexTraq vs Motive
- NexTraq vs GPS Trackit
- NexTraq vs Fleet Complete
- NexTraq vs Quartix
- NexTraq vs Zonar Systems
- NexTraq vs AssetWorks
- NexTraq vs Lytx
- NexTraq vs Ridecell
- NexTraq vs Uptake
- NexTraq vs Webfleet
- NexTraq vs Whip Around
- NexTraq vs onX Maps
- NexTraq vs Ride with GPS
- NexTraq vs AllTrails
- NexTraq vs Citymapper
- NexTraq vs Google Maps
- NexTraq vs Geographic Calculator
- NexTraq vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- NexTraq vs Leica Infinity
- NexTraq vs HERE Technologies
- NexTraq vs Cesium ion
- NexTraq vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- NexTraq vs Fused
- NexTraq vs Geoapify
- NexTraq vs LocationIQ
- NexTraq vs Lonboard
- NexTraq vs Global Mapper
- Trailforks vs Geotab
- Trailforks vs Verizon Connect
- Trailforks vs Azuga
- Trailforks vs Samsara
- Trailforks vs Motive
- Trailforks vs GPS Trackit
- Trailforks vs Fleet Complete
- Trailforks vs Quartix
- Trailforks vs Zonar Systems
- Trailforks vs AssetWorks
- Trailforks vs Lytx
- Trailforks vs Ridecell
- Trailforks vs Uptake
- Trailforks vs Webfleet
- Trailforks vs Whip Around
- Trailforks vs onX Maps
- Trailforks vs Ride with GPS
- Trailforks vs AllTrails
- Trailforks vs Citymapper
- Trailforks vs Google Maps
- Trailforks vs Geographic Calculator
- Trailforks vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- Trailforks vs Leica Infinity
- Trailforks vs HERE Technologies
- Trailforks vs Cesium ion
- Trailforks vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- Trailforks vs Fused
- Trailforks vs Geoapify
- Trailforks vs LocationIQ
- Trailforks vs Lonboard
- Trailforks vs Global Mapper
