Automation Integration · head to head
Cyclr vs Luzmo

Cyclr
Automation Integration
Embedded integration platform that SaaS vendors ship inside their own product
- From
- $1595/month
- Rated
- -

Luzmo
Business Intelligence
Embedded analytics for SaaS products, billed by monthly active dashboard users
- From
- €995/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cyclr entry pricing of 1,595 US dollars a month for one connector and 100,000 API calls means small vendors will find building two or three integrations in-house genuinely cheaper, and Cyclr only pays off past a certain integration count.; Luzmo billing by monthly active users means commercial success is punished: getting every one of your customers into the dashboard weekly is exactly the outcome that pushes you into the next tier.
- They diverge on capability: Cyclr covers White-label integration UI, Luzmo covers Multi-tenant row-level security.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cyclr and Luzmo actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cyclr
- White-label integration UI
- Connector library
- Workflow builder
- Custom connectors
- Regional hosting
- MCP server offering
- Usage metering
- Templates
Only in Luzmo
- Multi-tenant row-level security
- Embeddable editor
- Theming and white labelling
- SDKs and APIs
- Luzmo IQ
- Scheduled exports
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cyclr
- A mid-market SaaS vendor losing deals because prospects ask for a CRM integration it has not builtnot Luzmo
- A product team that would rather ship an integration marketplace this quarter than hire two engineers to maintain connectorsnot Luzmo
- A European software company that needs its customers' integration data processed inside the EU for procurement reasonsnot Luzmo
- A vendor whose customers each want a slightly different variation of the same integration and cannot be served by one hard-coded connectornot Luzmo
Luzmo
- A B2B SaaS product that needs customer-facing dashboards without hiring a front-end data visualisation teamnot Cyclr
- A vertical software vendor that wants to sell an analytics module as a paid add-onnot Cyclr
- A product where each customer must only see their own rows and the security boundary has to be provable to an auditornot Cyclr
- A team that wants end customers to build their own charts rather than filing feature requests for every new reportnot Cyclr
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cyclr
- Entry pricing of 1,595 US dollars a month for one connector and 100,000 API calls means small vendors will find building two or three integrations in-house genuinely cheaper, and Cyclr only pays off past a certain integration count.
- Connectors and API calls are metered separately, so a successful integration marketplace pushes you up tiers as your customers adopt it, meaning the cost rises with usage rather than with the revenue that usage generates.
- Custom connectors to APIs outside the library are your work to build and maintain, so the promise of not building integrations only holds for applications Cyclr already covers.
- Debugging is harder when the integration runs in a third-party runtime, because your support team sees a failed workflow rather than an HTTP response and has to escalate to Cyclr for anything non-obvious.
- Deep embedding creates real switching cost: your customers' live integrations run on Cyclr, so migrating later means recreating every customer workflow, which in practice means you rarely leave.
Luzmo
- Billing by monthly active users means commercial success is punished: getting every one of your customers into the dashboard weekly is exactly the outcome that pushes you into the next tier.
- The entry price of EUR 995 per month billed annually rules it out for early-stage products, so the realistic buyer already has meaningful revenue.
- It is built for embedding rather than internal analysis, so most customers still pay for a second BI tool for their own staff, doubling the analytics line item.
- The semantic modelling layer is lighter than a dedicated one such as dbt or Cube, so complex metric definitions often have to be pre-computed in the warehouse before Luzmo sees them.
- As a smaller European vendor it has less connector breadth and a smaller partner ecosystem than the US incumbents, and unusual data sources frequently need an intermediate warehouse hop.
Pricing, plan by plan
Cyclr
$1595/month- PAYG$1595/month
- 100,000 API calls included
- 1 connector included
- Unlimited integrations and users
- Growth$2595/month
- 1,000,000 API calls included
- 10 connectors included
- Everything in PAYG
- Scale$7195/month
- 5,000,000 API calls included
- Unlimited connectors
- Everything in Growth
- Private Cloud$undefined/month
- Dedicated hosting in US, UK or EU
- Configurable processing and runtime
- Quoted pricing
Luzmo
€995/month- Starter$995/month
- Embedded dashboards with white labelling
- Custom charts
- APIs and SDKs
- Premium$2495/month
- Everything in Starter
- End-customer self-service dashboard building
- Luzmo IQ conversational insights
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Dedicated VPC option
- Flexible hosting region
- OIDC single sign-on
Which should you pick?
Choose Cyclr if
- You need white-label integration ui.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want connector library.
Choose Luzmo if
- You need multi-tenant row-level security.
- You also want embeddable editor.
Questions people ask
- Is Cyclr or Luzmo better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cyclr starts at $1595/month and Luzmo at €995/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cyclr or Luzmo?
- Cyclr starts at $1595/month and Luzmo at €995/month.
- Does Cyclr or Luzmo run on more platforms?
- Cyclr runs on Web, API. Luzmo runs on Web.
- What is Cyclr best used for?
- Cyclr is most often used for a mid-market saas vendor losing deals because prospects ask for a crm integration it has not built, a product team that would rather ship an integration marketplace this quarter than hire two engineers to maintain connectors, a european software company that needs its customers' integration data processed inside the eu for procurement reasons, a vendor whose customers each want a slightly different variation of the same integration and cannot be served by one hard-coded connector. Of those, a mid-market saas vendor losing deals because prospects ask for a crm integration it has not built and a product team that would rather ship an integration marketplace this quarter than hire two engineers to maintain connectors are not what Luzmo is typically brought in for.
- What can Cyclr do that Luzmo cannot?
- Cyclr covers White-label integration UI, Connector library, Workflow builder, Custom connectors. Luzmo covers Multi-tenant row-level security, Embeddable editor, Theming and white labelling, SDKs and APIs.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cyclr: What does Cyclr actually cost?
Published tiers start at 1,595 US dollars per month for 100,000 API calls and one connector, rising to 7,195 for unlimited connectors and five million calls.
Luzmo: Is Luzmo the same as Cumul.io?
Yes. Cumul.io rebranded to Luzmo; it is the same company and product line.
Cyclr: Do my customers know they are using Cyclr?
No. The interface is white-labelled to appear as part of your product.
Luzmo: How is it priced?
By monthly active users of your embedded dashboards, from EUR 995 per month on Starter billed annually.
Cyclr: Can I host it in the EU or UK?
Yes, on the private cloud tiers, which matters for European procurement requirements.
Luzmo: Is there a free tier?
No, only a trial. There is no perpetual free plan.
Cyclr: What if the connector I need does not exist?
You build a custom connector using Cyclr tooling, which is work you own rather than work the platform removes.
Luzmo: Can our customers build their own dashboards?
Yes, but the embeddable editor for end-customer self-service sits on the Premium tier.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Cyclr vs Tray.io
- Cyclr vs Celigo
- Cyclr vs Workato
- Cyclr vs Alloy Automation
- Cyclr vs Paragon
- Cyclr vs Nango
- Cyclr vs Merge
- Cyclr vs Hatchet
- Cyclr vs Zapier
- Cyclr vs MuleSoft
- Cyclr vs Dagster
- Cyclr vs Fivetran
- Cyclr vs Informatica
- Cyclr vs Integromat
- Cyclr vs jBPM
- Cyclr vs Kogito
- Cyclr vs Letta
- Cyclr vs Lytics
- Cyclr vs GoodData
- Cyclr vs Sisense
- Cyclr vs DashThis
- Cyclr vs Reportz
- Cyclr vs Klipfolio
- Cyclr vs Baremetrics
- Cyclr vs ChartMogul
- Cyclr vs Cyfe
- Cyclr vs Hex
- Cyclr vs Deepnote
- Cyclr vs Grow
- Cyclr vs Rill Data
- Cyclr vs Holistics
- Cyclr vs Jedox
- Cyclr vs Logi Analytics
- Cyclr vs NetBase Quid
- Cyclr vs Phocas
- Cyclr vs Preset
- Luzmo vs Tray.io
- Luzmo vs Celigo
- Luzmo vs Workato
- Luzmo vs Alloy Automation
- Luzmo vs Paragon
- Luzmo vs Nango
- Luzmo vs Merge
- Luzmo vs Hatchet
- Luzmo vs Zapier
- Luzmo vs MuleSoft
- Luzmo vs Dagster
- Luzmo vs Fivetran
- Luzmo vs Informatica
- Luzmo vs Integromat
- Luzmo vs jBPM
- Luzmo vs Kogito
- Luzmo vs Letta
- Luzmo vs Lytics
- Luzmo vs GoodData
- Luzmo vs Sisense
- Luzmo vs DashThis
- Luzmo vs Reportz
- Luzmo vs Klipfolio
- Luzmo vs Baremetrics
- Luzmo vs ChartMogul
- Luzmo vs Cyfe
- Luzmo vs Hex
- Luzmo vs Deepnote
- Luzmo vs Grow
- Luzmo vs Rill Data
- Luzmo vs Holistics
- Luzmo vs Jedox
- Luzmo vs Logi Analytics
- Luzmo vs NetBase Quid
- Luzmo vs Phocas
- Luzmo vs Preset
