Automation Integration · head to head
Cyclr vs Reportz

Cyclr
Automation Integration
Embedded integration platform that SaaS vendors ship inside their own product
- From
- $1595/month
- Rated
- -

Reportz
Business Intelligence
Per-dashboard marketing reporting at under ten dollars a client
- From
- $9.9/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cyclr entry pricing of 1,595 US dollars a month for one connector and 100,000 API calls means small vendors will find building two or three integrations in-house genuinely cheaper, and Cyclr only pays off past a certain integration count.; Reportz the connector library is smaller than the established agency reporting tools, and if a platform you report on is missing there is no practical route to getting it added.
- They diverge on capability: Cyclr covers White-label integration UI, Reportz covers Per-dashboard pricing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cyclr and Reportz actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cyclr
- White-label integration UI
- Connector library
- Workflow builder
- Custom connectors
- Regional hosting
- MCP server offering
- Usage metering
- Templates
Only in Reportz
- Per-dashboard pricing
- Unlimited users
- Public share links
- White labelling
- Template library
- Scheduled reports
- Custom KPI widgets
- Client management
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cyclr
- A mid-market SaaS vendor losing deals because prospects ask for a CRM integration it has not builtnot Reportz
- A product team that would rather ship an integration marketplace this quarter than hire two engineers to maintain connectorsnot Reportz
- A European software company that needs its customers' integration data processed inside the EU for procurement reasonsnot Reportz
- A vendor whose customers each want a slightly different variation of the same integration and cannot be served by one hard-coded connectornot Reportz
Reportz
- A five-person SEO agency reporting to twenty five clients that cannot justify several hundred dollars a month for reporting softwarenot Cyclr
- A freelancer who needs one white-labelled dashboard per client and nothing elsenot Cyclr
- An agency giving clients a live link instead of a monthly PDF, without buying client seatsnot Cyclr
- A marketing team wanting a cheap always-on KPI screen fed from ad and analytics platformsnot Cyclr
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cyclr
- Entry pricing of 1,595 US dollars a month for one connector and 100,000 API calls means small vendors will find building two or three integrations in-house genuinely cheaper, and Cyclr only pays off past a certain integration count.
- Connectors and API calls are metered separately, so a successful integration marketplace pushes you up tiers as your customers adopt it, meaning the cost rises with usage rather than with the revenue that usage generates.
- Custom connectors to APIs outside the library are your work to build and maintain, so the promise of not building integrations only holds for applications Cyclr already covers.
- Debugging is harder when the integration runs in a third-party runtime, because your support team sees a failed workflow rather than an HTTP response and has to escalate to Cyclr for anything non-obvious.
- Deep embedding creates real switching cost: your customers' live integrations run on Cyclr, so migrating later means recreating every customer workflow, which in practice means you rarely leave.
Reportz
- The connector library is smaller than the established agency reporting tools, and if a platform you report on is missing there is no practical route to getting it added.
- Four Dots is a small agency-owned business rather than a funded software company, so API breakages and platform changes can take longer to fix than at larger vendors.
- There is no data modelling, SQL or warehouse layer, so cross-source analysis is limited to what the widget set already supports.
- Per-dashboard billing means an agency that builds several views per client loses the headline price advantage quickly.
- Documentation and support are thin compared with larger competitors, and complex setups often need direct email support rather than self-service answers.
Pricing, plan by plan
Cyclr
$1595/month- PAYG$1595/month
- 100,000 API calls included
- 1 connector included
- Unlimited integrations and users
- Growth$2595/month
- 1,000,000 API calls included
- 10 connectors included
- Everything in PAYG
- Scale$7195/month
- 5,000,000 API calls included
- Unlimited connectors
- Everything in Growth
- Private Cloud$undefined/month
- Dedicated hosting in US, UK or EU
- Configurable processing and runtime
- Quoted pricing
Reportz
$9.9/month- Consultant$9.9/month
- Priced per dashboard
- Unlimited users
- Unlimited data sources
- Agency$99/month
- Around ten dashboards at the same per-dashboard rate
- Unlimited users
- Custom domain
- Enterprise$742.5/month
- 75 dashboards
- Volume rate
- Unlimited users
Which should you pick?
Choose Cyclr if
- You need white-label integration ui.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want connector library.
Questions people ask
- Is Cyclr or Reportz better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cyclr starts at $1595/month and Reportz at $9.9/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cyclr or Reportz?
- Cyclr starts at $1595/month and Reportz at $9.9/month.
- Does Cyclr or Reportz run on more platforms?
- Cyclr runs on Web, API. Reportz runs on Web.
- What is Cyclr best used for?
- Cyclr is most often used for a mid-market saas vendor losing deals because prospects ask for a crm integration it has not built, a product team that would rather ship an integration marketplace this quarter than hire two engineers to maintain connectors, a european software company that needs its customers' integration data processed inside the eu for procurement reasons, a vendor whose customers each want a slightly different variation of the same integration and cannot be served by one hard-coded connector. Of those, a mid-market saas vendor losing deals because prospects ask for a crm integration it has not built and a product team that would rather ship an integration marketplace this quarter than hire two engineers to maintain connectors are not what Reportz is typically brought in for.
- What can Cyclr do that Reportz cannot?
- Cyclr covers White-label integration UI, Connector library, Workflow builder, Custom connectors. Reportz covers Per-dashboard pricing, Unlimited users, Public share links, White labelling.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cyclr: What does Cyclr actually cost?
Published tiers start at 1,595 US dollars per month for 100,000 API calls and one connector, rising to 7,195 for unlimited connectors and five million calls.
Reportz: What does Reportz cost?
9.90 US dollars per dashboard per month, with unlimited users and data sources on every tier.
Cyclr: Do my customers know they are using Cyclr?
No. The interface is white-labelled to appear as part of your product.
Reportz: Is there a free plan?
No, but there is a fifteen day trial with no card required.
Cyclr: Can I host it in the EU or UK?
Yes, on the private cloud tiers, which matters for European procurement requirements.
Reportz: Who is behind it?
Four Dots, a digital marketing agency in Belgrade that built the tool for its own client reporting.
Cyclr: What if the connector I need does not exist?
You build a custom connector using Cyclr tooling, which is work you own rather than work the platform removes.
Reportz: Can clients view without a login?
Yes, dashboards can be shared as a public link under your own domain.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Cyclr vs Tray.io
- Cyclr vs Celigo
- Cyclr vs Workato
- Cyclr vs Alloy Automation
- Cyclr vs Paragon
- Cyclr vs Nango
- Cyclr vs Merge
- Cyclr vs Hatchet
- Cyclr vs Zapier
- Cyclr vs MuleSoft
- Cyclr vs Dagster
- Cyclr vs Fivetran
- Cyclr vs Informatica
- Cyclr vs Integromat
- Cyclr vs jBPM
- Cyclr vs Kogito
- Cyclr vs Letta
- Cyclr vs Lytics
- Cyclr vs Klipfolio
- Cyclr vs Databox
- Cyclr vs DashThis
- Cyclr vs Luzmo
- Cyclr vs Cyfe
- Cyclr vs Hex
- Cyclr vs Deepnote
- Cyclr vs Dundas BI
- Cyclr vs Grow
- Cyclr vs Rill Data
- Cyclr vs Fabi
- Cyclr vs Phocas
- Cyclr vs Glean
- Cyclr vs Hebbia
- Cyclr vs Holistics
- Cyclr vs Jedox
- Cyclr vs Logi Analytics
- Reportz vs Tray.io
- Reportz vs Celigo
- Reportz vs Workato
- Reportz vs Alloy Automation
- Reportz vs Paragon
- Reportz vs Nango
- Reportz vs Merge
- Reportz vs Hatchet
- Reportz vs Zapier
- Reportz vs MuleSoft
- Reportz vs Dagster
- Reportz vs Fivetran
- Reportz vs Informatica
- Reportz vs Integromat
- Reportz vs jBPM
- Reportz vs Kogito
- Reportz vs Letta
- Reportz vs Lytics
- Reportz vs Klipfolio
- Reportz vs Databox
- Reportz vs DashThis
- Reportz vs Luzmo
- Reportz vs Cyfe
- Reportz vs Hex
- Reportz vs Deepnote
- Reportz vs Dundas BI
- Reportz vs Grow
- Reportz vs Rill Data
- Reportz vs Fabi
- Reportz vs Phocas
- Reportz vs Glean
- Reportz vs Hebbia
- Reportz vs Holistics
- Reportz vs Jedox
- Reportz vs Logi Analytics
