CRM & Sales · head to head
Clay vs TeamViewer

TeamViewer
Communication & Collaboration
Remote access and support software from Germany, used for connecting to computers anywhere
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Clay two separate meters run at once, actions and data credits, and a plan can exhaust either independently; TeamViewer pricing page gates all figures behind plan selection with no listed price for its Teams and Tensor Enterprise tiers, which are described as a fully customized license requiring sales contact
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Clay and TeamViewer actually diverge.
| Attribute | Clay | TeamViewer |
|---|---|---|
| Category | CRM & Sales | Communication & Collaboration |
| Founded | 2021 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Clay
- Data enrichment
- Contact management
- Workflow automation
- Integration
- API access
- Salesforce
- HubSpot
- Zapier
Only in TeamViewer
Nothing recorded that Clay does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Clay
- Enriching prospect lists from multiple data providers in one tablenot TeamViewer
- Building automated outbound research and outreach workflowsnot TeamViewer
TeamViewer
No use cases recorded yet. See the TeamViewer review.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Clay
- Two separate meters run at once, actions and data credits, and a plan can exhaust either independently
- Data credit overage is sold at a 30% premium over the plan rate, so exceeding the allowance costs more per unit than planning for it
- The free plan allows 500 actions, 100 data credits and 200 rows per table
- The entry paid plan starts at $167 a month, and both paid prices are starting figures rather than fixed
- The free plan cannot buy overage at all, so hitting the limit stops work rather than billing for it
TeamViewer
- Pricing page gates all figures behind plan selection with no listed price for its Teams and Tensor Enterprise tiers, which are described as a fully customized license requiring sales contact
- Add-on modules (Asset Management, Endpoint Protection, Device Monitoring, Assist AR Lite, Mobile Device Management) are sold separately from the core license, only offered with a 30-day free trial before charges apply
Pricing, plan by plan
Clay
On request- Pricing upon request$undefined/month
- Data enrichment
- Integration
- Support
TeamViewer
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the TeamViewer review.
Which should you pick?
Choose TeamViewer if
Nothing in the data separates TeamViewer from Clay on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is Clay or TeamViewer better?
- Neither clearly leads. Clay starts at On request and TeamViewer at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Clay or TeamViewer?
- Clay starts at On request and TeamViewer at On request.
- Does Clay or TeamViewer run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is Clay best used for?
- Clay is most often used for enriching prospect lists from multiple data providers in one table, building automated outbound research and outreach workflows. Of those, enriching prospect lists from multiple data providers in one table and building automated outbound research and outreach workflows are not what TeamViewer is typically brought in for.
- What can Clay do that TeamViewer cannot?
- Clay covers Data enrichment, Contact management, Workflow automation, Integration.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Clay vs Outreach
- Clay vs Gong
- Clay vs Seismic
- Clay vs Pipedrive
- Clay vs HubSpot
- Clay vs Salesforce
- Clay vs Bitrix24
- Clay vs Capsule
- Clay vs Clari
- Clay vs Freshsales
- Clay vs Streak
- Clay vs Zoho CRM
- Clay vs Affinity
- Clay vs Agile CRM
- Clay vs Apollo.io
- Clay vs Capsule CRM
- Clay vs Clearbit
- Clay vs Cloze
- Clay vs Zoom
- Clay vs Microsoft Teams
- Clay vs Loom
- Clay vs RingCentral Video
- Clay vs Slack
- Clay vs Telegram
- Clay vs Webex by Cisco
- Clay vs Chanty
- Clay vs Chatwork
- Clay vs Flock
- Clay vs Google Chat
- Clay vs Grasshopper
- Clay vs Lark
- Clay vs Mattermost
- Clay vs Quo
- Clay vs Rocket.Chat
- Clay vs Signal
- Clay vs Textline
- TeamViewer vs Outreach
- TeamViewer vs Gong
- TeamViewer vs Seismic
- TeamViewer vs Pipedrive
- TeamViewer vs HubSpot
- TeamViewer vs Salesforce
- TeamViewer vs Bitrix24
- TeamViewer vs Capsule
- TeamViewer vs Clari
- TeamViewer vs Freshsales
- TeamViewer vs Streak
- TeamViewer vs Zoho CRM
- TeamViewer vs Affinity
- TeamViewer vs Agile CRM
- TeamViewer vs Apollo.io
- TeamViewer vs Capsule CRM
- TeamViewer vs Clearbit
- TeamViewer vs Cloze
- TeamViewer vs Zoom
- TeamViewer vs Microsoft Teams
- TeamViewer vs Loom
- TeamViewer vs RingCentral Video
- TeamViewer vs Slack
- TeamViewer vs Telegram
- TeamViewer vs Webex by Cisco
- TeamViewer vs Chanty
- TeamViewer vs Chatwork
- TeamViewer vs Flock
- TeamViewer vs Google Chat
- TeamViewer vs Grasshopper
- TeamViewer vs Lark
- TeamViewer vs Mattermost
- TeamViewer vs Quo
- TeamViewer vs Rocket.Chat
- TeamViewer vs Signal
- TeamViewer vs Textline

