Software · head to head
Microsoft Teams vs TeamViewer
Microsoft Teams
Software
Meet, chat, call, and collaborate in just one place
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

TeamViewer
Software
Remote access and support software from Germany, used for connecting to computers anywhere
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Microsoft Teams has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Microsoft Teams resource-heavy application; slow to load and consumes significant CPU/memory compared to alternatives; TeamViewer pricing page gates all figures behind plan selection with no listed price for its Teams and Tensor Enterprise tiers, which are described as a fully customized license requiring sales contact
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Microsoft Teams and TeamViewer actually diverge.
| Attribute | Microsoft Teams | TeamViewer |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | subscription | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android | Web |
| Founded | 1975 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Microsoft Teams
- Chat & channels
- Video conferencing
- Screen sharing
- File collaboration
- Office integration
- Live events
- Phone system
- Apps & workflows
Only in TeamViewer
Nothing recorded that Microsoft Teams does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Microsoft Teams
- Remote meetingsnot TeamViewer
- Team collaborationnot TeamViewer
- Document sharingnot TeamViewer
- Project managementnot TeamViewer
- Webinarsnot TeamViewer
TeamViewer
No use cases recorded yet. See the TeamViewer review.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Microsoft Teams
- Resource-heavy application; slow to load and consumes significant CPU/memory compared to alternatives
- Limited channel structure; maximum of 200 public and 30 private channels per team
- Cannot invite guest users to specific channels; guest access grants full team visibility
- Unable to chat during screen sharing; limits real-time collaborative communication
- Limited customization options for branding and interface; cluttered UX compared to Slack
- Channels cannot be moved between teams; requires manual replication for reorganization
TeamViewer
- Pricing page gates all figures behind plan selection with no listed price for its Teams and Tensor Enterprise tiers, which are described as a fully customized license requiring sales contact
- Add-on modules (Asset Management, Endpoint Protection, Device Monitoring, Assist AR Lite, Mobile Device Management) are sold separately from the core license, only offered with a 30-day free trial before charges apply
Pricing, plan by plan
Microsoft Teams
Free- FreeFree
- Unlimited chat
- 100 participants in meetings
- 5GB file storage
- Microsoft Teams Essentials$4/month
- 300 participants in meetings
- 10GB cloud storage
- Phone & web support
- Microsoft 365 Business Basic$6/month
- Everything in Essentials
- 1TB OneDrive storage
- Web & mobile Office apps
- Microsoft 365 Business Standard$12.5/month
- Everything in Basic
- Desktop Office apps
- Webinar hosting
TeamViewer
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the TeamViewer review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Microsoft Teams if
- You need chat & channels.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android.
- You also want video conferencing.
Choose TeamViewer if
Nothing in the data separates TeamViewer from Microsoft Teams on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is Microsoft Teams or TeamViewer better?
- Neither clearly leads. Microsoft Teams starts at Free and TeamViewer at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Microsoft Teams or TeamViewer?
- Microsoft Teams has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Microsoft Teams and On request for TeamViewer.
- Does Microsoft Teams or TeamViewer run on more platforms?
- Microsoft Teams runs on Web, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android. TeamViewer runs on Web.
- Can I use Microsoft Teams for free?
- Yes. Microsoft Teams has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. TeamViewer starts at On request.
- What is Microsoft Teams best used for?
- Microsoft Teams is most often used for remote meetings, team collaboration, document sharing, project management. Of those, remote meetings and team collaboration are not what TeamViewer is typically brought in for.
- What can Microsoft Teams do that TeamViewer cannot?
- Microsoft Teams covers Chat & channels, Video conferencing, Screen sharing, File collaboration.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Microsoft Teams: Does Microsoft Teams have a free tier?
Yes. Microsoft Teams offers a free Home tier with unlimited chat, 60-minute group meetings for up to 100 people, 5GB cloud storage, and basic file sharing, though limits are restrictive for growing teams.
SourceMicrosoft Teams: What are Microsoft Teams' paid plans?
Microsoft Teams Essentials costs $4/user/month (chat, calling, meetings, 10GB storage). Microsoft 365 Business Basic costs $7/user/month (includes desktop Office apps, 1TB storage). Premium plans with Copilot start at $23.50/user/month.
SourceMicrosoft Teams: What are Microsoft Teams' primary features?
Teams provides real-time chat, video and voice calling, meetings with up to 300 participants, file sharing and storage integration with OneDrive, recording and transcripts, and deep integration with Microsoft 365 apps (Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook).
Microsoft Teams: What integrations does Teams support?
Microsoft Teams integrates with calendar apps (Outlook, Google Calendar), project management tools (Trello), and works with Zapier for custom workflow automation. Teams also has native connectors to many Microsoft 365 apps and third-party services.
Related pages
More on Microsoft Teams
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Microsoft Teams vs Zoom
- Microsoft Teams vs Loom
- Microsoft Teams vs RingCentral Video
- Microsoft Teams vs Slack
- Microsoft Teams vs Telegram
- Microsoft Teams vs Webex by Cisco
- Microsoft Teams vs Chanty
- Microsoft Teams vs Chatwork
- Microsoft Teams vs Flock
- Microsoft Teams vs Google Chat
- Microsoft Teams vs Grasshopper
- Microsoft Teams vs Lark
- Microsoft Teams vs Mattermost
- Microsoft Teams vs Quo
- Microsoft Teams vs Rocket.Chat
- Microsoft Teams vs Signal
- Microsoft Teams vs Textline
- TeamViewer vs Zoom
- TeamViewer vs Loom
- TeamViewer vs RingCentral Video
- TeamViewer vs Slack
- TeamViewer vs Telegram
- TeamViewer vs Webex by Cisco
- TeamViewer vs Chanty
- TeamViewer vs Chatwork
- TeamViewer vs Flock
- TeamViewer vs Google Chat
- TeamViewer vs Grasshopper
- TeamViewer vs Lark
- TeamViewer vs Mattermost
- TeamViewer vs Quo
- TeamViewer vs Rocket.Chat
- TeamViewer vs Signal
- TeamViewer vs Textline
