CRM & Sales · head to head
Clay vs Lark

Lark
Communication & Collaboration
The super app for team collaboration
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Lark has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Clay two separate meters run at once, actions and data credits, and a plan can exhaust either independently; Lark lark's own pricing page description states it offers a free starter pack, a Pro plan, and an Enterprise plan, and directs buyers to Contact us rather than publishing Pro/Enterprise figures on the rendered page.
- They diverge on capability: Clay covers Data enrichment, Lark covers Team messaging.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Clay and Lark actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Clay
- Data enrichment
- Contact management
- Workflow automation
- Integration
- API access
- HubSpot
- Zapier
- Slack
Only in Lark
- Team messaging
- Video conferencing
- Collaborative docs
- Cloud storage
- Calendar
- Jira
- GitHub
- Google Workspace
Both cover
- Salesforce
- Cloud deployment
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Clay
- Enriching prospect lists from multiple data providers in one tablenot Lark
- Building automated outbound research and outreach workflowsnot Lark
Lark
- Team communicationnot Clay
- Document collaborationnot Clay
- Project managementnot Clay
- Company intranetnot Clay
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Clay
- Two separate meters run at once, actions and data credits, and a plan can exhaust either independently
- Data credit overage is sold at a 30% premium over the plan rate, so exceeding the allowance costs more per unit than planning for it
- The free plan allows 500 actions, 100 data credits and 200 rows per table
- The entry paid plan starts at $167 a month, and both paid prices are starting figures rather than fixed
- The free plan cannot buy overage at all, so hitting the limit stops work rather than billing for it
Lark
- Lark's own pricing page description states it offers a free starter pack, a Pro plan, and an Enterprise plan, and directs buyers to Contact us rather than publishing Pro/Enterprise figures on the rendered page.
Pricing, plan by plan
Clay
On request- Pricing upon request$undefined/month
- Data enrichment
- Integration
- Support
Lark
Free- StarterFree
- Up to 50 users
- 100GB storage
- Unlimited messaging
- Pro$12/month
- Unlimited users
- 1TB storage per user
- 24-hour meetings
- Enterprise$20/month
- SSO/SAML
- eDiscovery
- Custom retention
Which should you pick?
Choose Lark if
- You need team messaging.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Windows, Macos, Linux, Ios, Android.
- You also want video conferencing.
Questions people ask
- Is Clay or Lark better?
- Neither clearly leads. Clay starts at On request and Lark at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Clay or Lark?
- Lark has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Clay and Free for Lark.
- Does Clay or Lark run on more platforms?
- Clay runs on Web. Lark runs on Web, Windows, Macos, Linux, Ios, Android.
- Can I use Lark for free?
- Yes. Lark has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Clay starts at On request.
- What is Clay best used for?
- Clay is most often used for enriching prospect lists from multiple data providers in one table, building automated outbound research and outreach workflows. Of those, enriching prospect lists from multiple data providers in one table and building automated outbound research and outreach workflows are not what Lark is typically brought in for.
- What can Clay do that Lark cannot?
- Clay covers Data enrichment, Contact management, Workflow automation, Integration. Lark covers Team messaging, Video conferencing, Collaborative docs, Cloud storage. Both handle Salesforce, Cloud deployment, Web support.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Clay vs Outreach
- Clay vs Gong
- Clay vs Seismic
- Clay vs Pipedrive
- Clay vs HubSpot
- Clay vs Salesforce
- Clay vs Bitrix24
- Clay vs Capsule
- Clay vs Clari
- Clay vs Freshsales
- Clay vs Streak
- Clay vs Zoho CRM
- Clay vs Affinity
- Clay vs Agile CRM
- Clay vs Apollo.io
- Clay vs Capsule CRM
- Clay vs Clearbit
- Clay vs Cloze
- Clay vs Zoom
- Clay vs Microsoft Teams
- Clay vs Loom
- Clay vs RingCentral Video
- Clay vs Slack
- Clay vs Telegram
- Clay vs Webex by Cisco
- Clay vs Chanty
- Clay vs Chatwork
- Clay vs Flock
- Clay vs Google Chat
- Clay vs Grasshopper
- Clay vs Mattermost
- Clay vs Quo
- Clay vs Rocket.Chat
- Clay vs Signal
- Clay vs TeamViewer
- Clay vs Textline
- Lark vs Outreach
- Lark vs Gong
- Lark vs Seismic
- Lark vs Pipedrive
- Lark vs HubSpot
- Lark vs Salesforce
- Lark vs Bitrix24
- Lark vs Capsule
- Lark vs Clari
- Lark vs Freshsales
- Lark vs Streak
- Lark vs Zoho CRM
- Lark vs Affinity
- Lark vs Agile CRM
- Lark vs Apollo.io
- Lark vs Capsule CRM
- Lark vs Clearbit
- Lark vs Cloze
- Lark vs Zoom
- Lark vs Microsoft Teams
- Lark vs Loom
- Lark vs RingCentral Video
- Lark vs Slack
- Lark vs Telegram
- Lark vs Webex by Cisco
- Lark vs Chanty
- Lark vs Chatwork
- Lark vs Flock
- Lark vs Google Chat
- Lark vs Grasshopper
- Lark vs Mattermost
- Lark vs Quo
- Lark vs Rocket.Chat
- Lark vs Signal
- Lark vs TeamViewer
- Lark vs Textline

