Softwr

CRM & Sales · head to head

Clay vs Quo

Clay logo

Clay

CRM & Sales

Data platform for sales teams

From
On request
Rated
-
Quo logo

Quo

Communication & Collaboration

Formerly OpenPhone

From
Free
Rated
-

The short version

  • Only Quo has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • Each has a real cost: Clay two separate meters run at once, actions and data credits, and a plan can exhaust either independently; Quo unlimited calling to US and Canadian numbers is subject to a Fair Usage Policy rather than being truly unlimited

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Clay and Quo actually diverge.

Attributes where Clay and Quo differ
AttributeClayQuo
Starting priceOn requestFree
Pricing modelquotefreemium
Free tierNoYes
CategoryCRM & SalesCommunication & Collaboration
Founded2021Unknown

Identical on both: platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Clay

  • Data enrichment
  • Contact management
  • Workflow automation
  • Integration
  • API access
  • Salesforce
  • HubSpot
  • Zapier

Only in Quo

Nothing recorded that Clay does not also cover.

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Clay

  • Enriching prospect lists from multiple data providers in one tablenot Quo
  • Building automated outbound research and outreach workflowsnot Quo

Quo

No use cases recorded yet. See the Quo review.

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Clay

  • Two separate meters run at once, actions and data credits, and a plan can exhaust either independently
  • Data credit overage is sold at a 30% premium over the plan rate, so exceeding the allowance costs more per unit than planning for it
  • The free plan allows 500 actions, 100 data credits and 200 rows per table
  • The entry paid plan starts at $167 a month, and both paid prices are starting figures rather than fixed
  • The free plan cannot buy overage at all, so hitting the limit stops work rather than billing for it

Quo

  • Unlimited calling to US and Canadian numbers is subject to a Fair Usage Policy rather than being truly unlimited
  • Starter tier's $15/user annual rate requires prepaying annually; monthly billing costs $19/user, about 27% more
  • The Sona AI agent automation credits are capped at 1,000 free per plan before additional usage is billed

Pricing, plan by plan

Clay

On request
  • Pricing upon request$undefined/month
    • Data enrichment
    • Integration
    • Support

Quo

Free

No published plan breakdown. See the Quo review.

Which should you pick?

Choose Clay if

  • You need data enrichment.
  • You also want contact management.

Choose Quo if

  • You want to start without paying.

Questions people ask

Is Clay or Quo better?
Neither clearly leads. Clay starts at On request and Quo at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Clay or Quo?
Quo has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Clay and Free for Quo.
Does Clay or Quo run on more platforms?
Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
Can I use Quo for free?
Yes. Quo has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Clay starts at On request.
What is Clay best used for?
Clay is most often used for enriching prospect lists from multiple data providers in one table, building automated outbound research and outreach workflows. Of those, enriching prospect lists from multiple data providers in one table and building automated outbound research and outreach workflows are not what Quo is typically brought in for.
What can Clay do that Quo cannot?
Clay covers Data enrichment, Contact management, Workflow automation, Integration.

Related pages

Other head to heads