Software · head to head
Clay vs Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Teams
Software
Meet, chat, call, and collaborate in just one place
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Microsoft Teams has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Clay two separate meters run at once, actions and data credits, and a plan can exhaust either independently; Microsoft Teams resource-heavy application; slow to load and consumes significant CPU/memory compared to alternatives
- They diverge on capability: Clay covers Data enrichment, Microsoft Teams covers Chat & channels.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Clay and Microsoft Teams actually diverge.
| Attribute | Clay | Microsoft Teams |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | subscription |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web | Web, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android |
| Founded | 2021 | 1975 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Clay
- Data enrichment
- Contact management
- Workflow automation
- Integration
- API access
- Salesforce
- HubSpot
- Zapier
Only in Microsoft Teams
- Chat & channels
- Video conferencing
- Screen sharing
- File collaboration
- Office integration
- Live events
- Phone system
- Apps & workflows
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Clay
- Enriching prospect lists from multiple data providers in one tablenot Microsoft Teams
- Building automated outbound research and outreach workflowsnot Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Teams
- Remote meetingsnot Clay
- Team collaborationnot Clay
- Document sharingnot Clay
- Project managementnot Clay
- Webinarsnot Clay
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Clay
- Two separate meters run at once, actions and data credits, and a plan can exhaust either independently
- Data credit overage is sold at a 30% premium over the plan rate, so exceeding the allowance costs more per unit than planning for it
- The free plan allows 500 actions, 100 data credits and 200 rows per table
- The entry paid plan starts at $167 a month, and both paid prices are starting figures rather than fixed
- The free plan cannot buy overage at all, so hitting the limit stops work rather than billing for it
Microsoft Teams
- Resource-heavy application; slow to load and consumes significant CPU/memory compared to alternatives
- Limited channel structure; maximum of 200 public and 30 private channels per team
- Cannot invite guest users to specific channels; guest access grants full team visibility
- Unable to chat during screen sharing; limits real-time collaborative communication
- Limited customization options for branding and interface; cluttered UX compared to Slack
- Channels cannot be moved between teams; requires manual replication for reorganization
Pricing, plan by plan
Clay
On request- Pricing upon request$undefined/month
- Data enrichment
- Integration
- Support
Microsoft Teams
Free- FreeFree
- Unlimited chat
- 100 participants in meetings
- 5GB file storage
- Microsoft Teams Essentials$4/month
- 300 participants in meetings
- 10GB cloud storage
- Phone & web support
- Microsoft 365 Business Basic$6/month
- Everything in Essentials
- 1TB OneDrive storage
- Web & mobile Office apps
- Microsoft 365 Business Standard$12.5/month
- Everything in Basic
- Desktop Office apps
- Webinar hosting
Which should you pick?
Choose Microsoft Teams if
- You need chat & channels.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android.
- You also want video conferencing.
Questions people ask
- Is Clay or Microsoft Teams better?
- Neither clearly leads. Clay starts at On request and Microsoft Teams at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Clay or Microsoft Teams?
- Microsoft Teams has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Clay and Free for Microsoft Teams.
- Does Clay or Microsoft Teams run on more platforms?
- Clay runs on Web. Microsoft Teams runs on Web, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Microsoft Teams for free?
- Yes. Microsoft Teams has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Clay starts at On request.
- What is Clay best used for?
- Clay is most often used for enriching prospect lists from multiple data providers in one table, building automated outbound research and outreach workflows. Of those, enriching prospect lists from multiple data providers in one table and building automated outbound research and outreach workflows are not what Microsoft Teams is typically brought in for.
- What can Clay do that Microsoft Teams cannot?
- Clay covers Data enrichment, Contact management, Workflow automation, Integration. Microsoft Teams covers Chat & channels, Video conferencing, Screen sharing, File collaboration.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Microsoft Teams: Does Microsoft Teams have a free tier?
Yes. Microsoft Teams offers a free Home tier with unlimited chat, 60-minute group meetings for up to 100 people, 5GB cloud storage, and basic file sharing, though limits are restrictive for growing teams.
SourceMicrosoft Teams: What are Microsoft Teams' paid plans?
Microsoft Teams Essentials costs $4/user/month (chat, calling, meetings, 10GB storage). Microsoft 365 Business Basic costs $7/user/month (includes desktop Office apps, 1TB storage). Premium plans with Copilot start at $23.50/user/month.
SourceMicrosoft Teams: What are Microsoft Teams' primary features?
Teams provides real-time chat, video and voice calling, meetings with up to 300 participants, file sharing and storage integration with OneDrive, recording and transcripts, and deep integration with Microsoft 365 apps (Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook).
Microsoft Teams: What integrations does Teams support?
Microsoft Teams integrates with calendar apps (Outlook, Google Calendar), project management tools (Trello), and works with Zapier for custom workflow automation. Teams also has native connectors to many Microsoft 365 apps and third-party services.
Related pages
More on Microsoft Teams
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Clay vs Outreach
- Clay vs Gong
- Clay vs Seismic
- Clay vs Pipedrive
- Clay vs HubSpot
- Clay vs Salesforce
- Clay vs Bitrix24
- Clay vs Capsule
- Clay vs Clari
- Clay vs Freshsales
- Clay vs Streak
- Clay vs Zoho CRM
- Clay vs Affinity
- Clay vs Agile CRM
- Clay vs Apollo.io
- Clay vs Capsule CRM
- Clay vs Clearbit
- Clay vs Cloze
- Clay vs Zoom
- Clay vs Loom
- Clay vs RingCentral Video
- Clay vs Slack
- Clay vs Telegram
- Clay vs Webex by Cisco
- Clay vs Chanty
- Clay vs Chatwork
- Clay vs Flock
- Clay vs Google Chat
- Clay vs Grasshopper
- Clay vs Lark
- Clay vs Mattermost
- Clay vs Quo
- Clay vs Rocket.Chat
- Clay vs Signal
- Clay vs TeamViewer
- Clay vs Textline
- Microsoft Teams vs Outreach
- Microsoft Teams vs Gong
- Microsoft Teams vs Seismic
- Microsoft Teams vs Pipedrive
- Microsoft Teams vs HubSpot
- Microsoft Teams vs Salesforce
- Microsoft Teams vs Bitrix24
- Microsoft Teams vs Capsule
- Microsoft Teams vs Clari
- Microsoft Teams vs Freshsales
- Microsoft Teams vs Streak
- Microsoft Teams vs Zoho CRM
- Microsoft Teams vs Affinity
- Microsoft Teams vs Agile CRM
- Microsoft Teams vs Apollo.io
- Microsoft Teams vs Capsule CRM
- Microsoft Teams vs Clearbit
- Microsoft Teams vs Cloze
- Microsoft Teams vs Zoom
- Microsoft Teams vs Loom
- Microsoft Teams vs RingCentral Video
- Microsoft Teams vs Slack
- Microsoft Teams vs Telegram
- Microsoft Teams vs Webex by Cisco
- Microsoft Teams vs Chanty
- Microsoft Teams vs Chatwork
- Microsoft Teams vs Flock
- Microsoft Teams vs Google Chat
- Microsoft Teams vs Grasshopper
- Microsoft Teams vs Lark
- Microsoft Teams vs Mattermost
- Microsoft Teams vs Quo
- Microsoft Teams vs Rocket.Chat
- Microsoft Teams vs Signal
- Microsoft Teams vs TeamViewer
- Microsoft Teams vs Textline

