Government · head to head
CKAN vs Resolver

Resolver
Cybersecurity
Risk, incident and investigations platform for corporate security and operational risk teams, owned by Kroll
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only CKAN has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: CKAN the package install path requires Ubuntu 20.04 or 22.04 64-bit specifically; other operating systems must use the source install; Resolver kroll ownership since 2022 means the product is sold alongside risk consulting services, so buyers who want software with no services attach should expect that conversation and should price the licence separately in negotiation.
- They diverge on capability: CKAN covers Dataset Management, Resolver covers Incident management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CKAN and Resolver actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CKAN
- Dataset Management
- Data Harvesting
- API Access
- Visualization
- Extensions
- DataPusher
- Harvester
- Third-party Tools
Only in Resolver
- Incident management
- Investigations
- Enterprise risk management
- Internal audit
- Compliance and obligations
- Business continuity
- Risk Event Management
- Configurable dashboards
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CKAN
- Publishing open government datasets in a searchable public data portalnot Resolver
- Self-hosting a data catalogue with harvesting and an APInot Resolver
Resolver
- A national retailer consolidating store incident reporting, loss prevention cases and investigations into one system with defensible evidence handlingnot CKAN
- A bank that needs operational risk events captured against a risk and control register rather than in spreadsheets and emailnot CKAN
- A university security operations centre running dispatch, case management and clery-style reporting from a single recordnot CKAN
- An organisation that already retains Kroll for investigations and wants case intake and vendor handoff in the same platformnot CKAN
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CKAN
- The package install path requires Ubuntu 20.04 or 22.04 64-bit specifically; other operating systems must use the source install
- Only Solr 9 and Solr 8 are supported, and from CKAN 2.10 they are the only Solr versions supported at all
- A working deployment requires PostgreSQL, Solr, Redis, nginx, supervisor and uWSGI to be installed and maintained separately
- Python 3.10 or later is required
Resolver
- Kroll ownership since 2022 means the product is sold alongside risk consulting services, so buyers who want software with no services attach should expect that conversation and should price the licence separately in negotiation.
- Configuration flexibility comes at the cost of implementation time, with deployments commonly running several months and typically requiring vendor or partner services, so the first-year cost is well above the annual licence.
- Module-based pricing means the platform gets expensive quickly once you add audit, compliance and continuity to a security-led purchase, and modules bought later rarely carry the discount of the original deal.
- The IT and cyber compliance side is thinner than dedicated tools, so organisations chasing SOC 2 or ISO 27001 evidence automation will find it does not replace a Drata or Vanta.
- Reporting is capable but the drag and drop builder has a real learning curve, and organisations that do not train an internal administrator end up raising support tickets for changes that should be self-service.
Pricing, plan by plan
CKAN
Free- Open SourceFree
- Data Management
- API Access
- Visualization
Resolver
On request- Resolver Core$undefined/year
- Priced by modules selected and number of users
- Annual or multi-year enterprise agreement
- Implementation and configuration quoted separately
Which should you pick?
Choose CKAN if
- You need dataset management.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want data harvesting.
Choose Resolver if
- You need incident management.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want investigations.
Questions people ask
- Is CKAN or Resolver better?
- Neither clearly leads. CKAN starts at Free and Resolver at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CKAN or Resolver?
- CKAN has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for CKAN and On request for Resolver.
- Does CKAN or Resolver run on more platforms?
- CKAN runs on Web. Resolver runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use CKAN for free?
- Yes. CKAN has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Resolver starts at On request.
- What is CKAN best used for?
- CKAN is most often used for publishing open government datasets in a searchable public data portal, self-hosting a data catalogue with harvesting and an api. Of those, publishing open government datasets in a searchable public data portal and self-hosting a data catalogue with harvesting and an api are not what Resolver is typically brought in for.
- What can CKAN do that Resolver cannot?
- CKAN covers Dataset Management, Data Harvesting, API Access, Visualization. Resolver covers Incident management, Investigations, Enterprise risk management, Internal audit.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CKAN: Is CKAN open-source and what license is it available under?
Yes, CKAN is an open-source data management system built on Python and available on GitHub. The license terms are available on their GitHub repository.
SourceResolver: Who owns Resolver?
Kroll, which acquired it in 2022. It is marketed as a Kroll business and sold alongside Kroll risk and investigations services.
CKAN: Does CKAN offer commercial support for organizations?
Yes, CKAN offers commercial support through certified providers including Link Digital and Datopian. Support includes advisory services, application development, integration, managed hosting, and web development.
SourceResolver: What does Resolver cost?
Pricing is not published. It is quoted by module and user count on an annual or multi-year enterprise agreement, with implementation charged separately.
CKAN: Who is responsible for hosting costs when running CKAN?
Organizations deploying CKAN are responsible for their own hosting infrastructure. Commercial providers like Datopian and Link Digital offer managed hosting services if organizations prefer not to self-host.
SourceResolver: Is Resolver a SOC 2 compliance tool?
No. It is a risk, incident and investigations platform. Automated evidence collection for security certifications is not its strength.
Resolver: How long does implementation take?
Months rather than weeks for a multi-module deployment, and most customers use vendor or partner services to configure it.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- CKAN vs Granicus
- CKAN vs DocuWare
- CKAN vs Accela
- CKAN vs CivicPlus
- CKAN vs Socrata
- CKAN vs DataSF
- CKAN vs mySidewalk
- CKAN vs Laserfiche
- CKAN vs IAPro
- CKAN vs Bidnet Direct
- CKAN vs eCode360
- CKAN vs Axon Records
- CKAN vs CitizenLab
- CKAN vs ClearGov
- CKAN vs DemandStar
- CKAN vs MyRec.com
- CKAN vs Legistar
- CKAN vs LogicManager
- CKAN vs Diligent
- CKAN vs MetricStream
- CKAN vs NICE Actimize
- CKAN vs Omada Identity
- CKAN vs Sardine
- CKAN vs Silent Eight
- CKAN vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- CKAN vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- CKAN vs OneTrust
- CKAN vs Rhombus Systems
- CKAN vs Trulioo
- CKAN vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- CKAN vs ExpressVPN
- CKAN vs Falco
- CKAN vs Fenergo
- CKAN vs Google Authenticator
- CKAN vs Grype
- Resolver vs Granicus
- Resolver vs DocuWare
- Resolver vs Accela
- Resolver vs CivicPlus
- Resolver vs Socrata
- Resolver vs DataSF
- Resolver vs mySidewalk
- Resolver vs Laserfiche
- Resolver vs IAPro
- Resolver vs Bidnet Direct
- Resolver vs eCode360
- Resolver vs Axon Records
- Resolver vs CitizenLab
- Resolver vs ClearGov
- Resolver vs DemandStar
- Resolver vs MyRec.com
- Resolver vs Legistar
- Resolver vs LogicManager
- Resolver vs Diligent
- Resolver vs MetricStream
- Resolver vs NICE Actimize
- Resolver vs Omada Identity
- Resolver vs Sardine
- Resolver vs Silent Eight
- Resolver vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Resolver vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Resolver vs OneTrust
- Resolver vs Rhombus Systems
- Resolver vs Trulioo
- Resolver vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Resolver vs ExpressVPN
- Resolver vs Falco
- Resolver vs Fenergo
- Resolver vs Google Authenticator
- Resolver vs Grype

