Government · head to head
CKAN vs Sardine

Sardine
Cybersecurity
Device intelligence and behaviour biometrics for fraud and compliance
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only CKAN has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: CKAN the package install path requires Ubuntu 20.04 or 22.04 64-bit specifically; other operating systems must use the source install; Sardine signal quality depends on the SDK being embedded in your own web and mobile clients, so fraud improvements become dependent on your app release cycle and any coverage gap is a blind spot.
- They diverge on capability: CKAN covers Dataset Management, Sardine covers Device intelligence.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CKAN and Sardine actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CKAN
- Dataset Management
- Data Harvesting
- API Access
- Visualization
- Extensions
- DataPusher
- Harvester
- Third-party Tools
Only in Sardine
- Device intelligence
- Behaviour biometrics
- Scam detection
- Onboarding risk scoring
- AML transaction monitoring
- Dispute and chargeback handling
- Rules editor
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CKAN
- Publishing open government datasets in a searchable public data portalnot Sardine
- Self-hosting a data catalogue with harvesting and an APInot Sardine
Sardine
- A neobank losing money to authorised push payment scams where the customer genuinely approved the transfernot CKAN
- A crypto exchange trying to detect accounts being operated by remote access rather than by their ownernot CKAN
- A fintech seeing synthetic identity signups that pass document verification but share device characteristicsnot CKAN
- A lender wanting first party fraud signals at application time that a credit bureau file does not containnot CKAN
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CKAN
- The package install path requires Ubuntu 20.04 or 22.04 64-bit specifically; other operating systems must use the source install
- Only Solr 9 and Solr 8 are supported, and from CKAN 2.10 they are the only Solr versions supported at all
- A working deployment requires PostgreSQL, Solr, Redis, nginx, supervisor and uWSGI to be installed and maintained separately
- Python 3.10 or later is required
Sardine
- Signal quality depends on the SDK being embedded in your own web and mobile clients, so fraud improvements become dependent on your app release cycle and any coverage gap is a blind spot.
- Behavioural and device telemetry collection needs a documented lawful basis under GDPR, and EU privacy reviews frequently delay rollouts that were scoped as engineering work.
- Pricing is per session or per active user, so a consumer product with many low value sessions pays in proportion to traffic rather than to fraud exposure.
- As a younger private company it lacks the enforcement-tested audit history that a bank examiner expects, which makes it a harder sell inside a regulated bank than inside a fintech.
- It is strongest on session-time signals and weaker as a system of record for long horizon AML typologies, so larger institutions end up running it alongside a traditional monitoring platform rather than instead of one.
Pricing, plan by plan
CKAN
Free- Open SourceFree
- Data Management
- API Access
- Visualization
Sardine
On request- Sardine$undefined/year
- Priced per user session or per monthly active user
- Annual contract with volume commitment
- SDK for web, iOS and Android
Which should you pick?
Choose CKAN if
- You need dataset management.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want data harvesting.
Choose Sardine if
- You need device intelligence.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want behaviour biometrics.
Questions people ask
- Is CKAN or Sardine better?
- Neither clearly leads. CKAN starts at Free and Sardine at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CKAN or Sardine?
- CKAN has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for CKAN and On request for Sardine.
- Does CKAN or Sardine run on more platforms?
- CKAN runs on Web. Sardine runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use CKAN for free?
- Yes. CKAN has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Sardine starts at On request.
- What is CKAN best used for?
- CKAN is most often used for publishing open government datasets in a searchable public data portal, self-hosting a data catalogue with harvesting and an api. Of those, publishing open government datasets in a searchable public data portal and self-hosting a data catalogue with harvesting and an api are not what Sardine is typically brought in for.
- What can CKAN do that Sardine cannot?
- CKAN covers Dataset Management, Data Harvesting, API Access, Visualization. Sardine covers Device intelligence, Behaviour biometrics, Scam detection, Onboarding risk scoring.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CKAN: Is CKAN open-source and what license is it available under?
Yes, CKAN is an open-source data management system built on Python and available on GitHub. The license terms are available on their GitHub repository.
SourceSardine: Does Sardine do document verification?
It focuses on device, behavioural and transaction signals, and integrates identity verification providers rather than being one. Treat it as complementary to a KYC vendor.
CKAN: Does CKAN offer commercial support for organizations?
Yes, CKAN offers commercial support through certified providers including Link Digital and Datopian. Support includes advisory services, application development, integration, managed hosting, and web development.
SourceSardine: What does it need from us to work?
An SDK in your web and mobile applications plus transaction feeds. Without the client side collector you lose the signals that differentiate it.
CKAN: Who is responsible for hosting costs when running CKAN?
Organizations deploying CKAN are responsible for their own hosting infrastructure. Commercial providers like Datopian and Link Digital offer managed hosting services if organizations prefer not to self-host.
SourceSardine: Is pricing published?
No. It is quoted, typically per session or per monthly active user with an annual volume commitment.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- CKAN vs Granicus
- CKAN vs DocuWare
- CKAN vs Accela
- CKAN vs CivicPlus
- CKAN vs Socrata
- CKAN vs DataSF
- CKAN vs mySidewalk
- CKAN vs Laserfiche
- CKAN vs IAPro
- CKAN vs Bidnet Direct
- CKAN vs eCode360
- CKAN vs Axon Records
- CKAN vs CitizenLab
- CKAN vs ClearGov
- CKAN vs DemandStar
- CKAN vs MyRec.com
- CKAN vs Legistar
- CKAN vs Unit21
- CKAN vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- CKAN vs Feedzai
- CKAN vs NICE Actimize
- CKAN vs Socure
- CKAN vs ThetaRay
- CKAN vs Transmit Security
- CKAN vs Jumio
- CKAN vs iDenfy
- CKAN vs Silent Eight
- CKAN vs Sumsub
- CKAN vs Quantexa
- CKAN vs TunnelBear
- CKAN vs Vanta
- CKAN vs Acunetix
- CKAN vs Aikido
- CKAN vs Arnica
- CKAN vs Authelia
- Sardine vs Granicus
- Sardine vs DocuWare
- Sardine vs Accela
- Sardine vs CivicPlus
- Sardine vs Socrata
- Sardine vs DataSF
- Sardine vs mySidewalk
- Sardine vs Laserfiche
- Sardine vs IAPro
- Sardine vs Bidnet Direct
- Sardine vs eCode360
- Sardine vs Axon Records
- Sardine vs CitizenLab
- Sardine vs ClearGov
- Sardine vs DemandStar
- Sardine vs MyRec.com
- Sardine vs Legistar
- Sardine vs Unit21
- Sardine vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Sardine vs Feedzai
- Sardine vs NICE Actimize
- Sardine vs Socure
- Sardine vs ThetaRay
- Sardine vs Transmit Security
- Sardine vs Jumio
- Sardine vs iDenfy
- Sardine vs Silent Eight
- Sardine vs Sumsub
- Sardine vs Quantexa
- Sardine vs TunnelBear
- Sardine vs Vanta
- Sardine vs Acunetix
- Sardine vs Aikido
- Sardine vs Arnica
- Sardine vs Authelia

