Cybersecurity · head to head
LogicManager vs Resolver
LogicManager
Cybersecurity
Enterprise risk management priced as a flat fee with unlimited users
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
Resolver
Cybersecurity
Risk, incident and investigations platform for corporate security and operational risk teams, owned by Kroll
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: LogicManager the flat fee is quoted per organisation and not published, so the pricing model that makes LogicManager attractive still cannot be compared without a sales process.; Resolver kroll ownership since 2022 means the product is sold alongside risk consulting services, so buyers who want software with no services attach should expect that conversation and should price the licence separately in negotiation.
- They diverge on capability: LogicManager covers Risk taxonomy, Resolver covers Investigations.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which LogicManager and Resolver actually diverge.
| Attribute | LogicManager | Resolver |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web | Web, iOS, Android |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in LogicManager
- Risk taxonomy
- Unlimited users
- Risk assessments
- Third-party risk
- Policy management
- Advisory support
Only in Resolver
- Investigations
- Enterprise risk management
- Compliance and obligations
- Business continuity
- Risk Event Management
- Configurable dashboards
Both cover
- Internal audit
- Incident management
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
LogicManager
- A mid-sized bank or credit union that needs every department head contributing to risk assessment without paying for a seat eachnot Resolver
- A risk team replacing a spreadsheet register that cannot show which controls a given vendor failure would affectnot Resolver
- An organisation preparing for a regulatory examination that must evidence a linked risk, control and issue trailnot Resolver
- A company consolidating separate vendor risk, policy and audit tools onto one taxonomy so findings are not duplicatednot Resolver
Resolver
- A national retailer consolidating store incident reporting, loss prevention cases and investigations into one system with defensible evidence handlingnot LogicManager
- A bank that needs operational risk events captured against a risk and control register rather than in spreadsheets and emailnot LogicManager
- A university security operations centre running dispatch, case management and clery-style reporting from a single recordnot LogicManager
- An organisation that already retains Kroll for investigations and wants case intake and vendor handoff in the same platformnot LogicManager
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
LogicManager
- The flat fee is quoted per organisation and not published, so the pricing model that makes LogicManager attractive still cannot be compared without a sales process.
- Configuration depth means the taxonomy has to be designed properly before rollout, and organisations that skip that step end up with a structure that cannot answer the linkage questions the tool exists to answer.
- Reporting and dashboarding are functional rather than flexible, and teams wanting bespoke board reporting commonly export to Power BI, which reintroduces the manual step they were removing.
- Quantitative risk modelling is limited compared with specialist tools, so organisations needing Monte Carlo style loss simulation will need something else alongside it.
- The user interface is dated relative to newer compliance automation tools, and infrequent business users often need repeat training, which erodes the participation benefit that unlimited licensing is supposed to deliver.
Resolver
- Kroll ownership since 2022 means the product is sold alongside risk consulting services, so buyers who want software with no services attach should expect that conversation and should price the licence separately in negotiation.
- Configuration flexibility comes at the cost of implementation time, with deployments commonly running several months and typically requiring vendor or partner services, so the first-year cost is well above the annual licence.
- Module-based pricing means the platform gets expensive quickly once you add audit, compliance and continuity to a security-led purchase, and modules bought later rarely carry the discount of the original deal.
- The IT and cyber compliance side is thinner than dedicated tools, so organisations chasing SOC 2 or ISO 27001 evidence automation will find it does not replace a Drata or Vanta.
- Reporting is capable but the drag and drop builder has a real learning curve, and organisations that do not train an internal administrator end up raising support tickets for changes that should be self-service.
Pricing, plan by plan
LogicManager
On request- LogicManager Platform$undefined/year
- Fixed annual fee, unlimited users
- Risk, audit, vendor, policy and incident modules
- Advisory analyst support included
Resolver
On request- Resolver Core$undefined/year
- Priced by modules selected and number of users
- Annual or multi-year enterprise agreement
- Implementation and configuration quoted separately
Which should you pick?
Choose Resolver if
- You need investigations.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want enterprise risk management.
Questions people ask
- Is LogicManager or Resolver better?
- Neither clearly leads. LogicManager starts at On request and Resolver at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, LogicManager or Resolver?
- LogicManager starts at On request and Resolver at On request.
- Does LogicManager or Resolver run on more platforms?
- LogicManager runs on Web. Resolver runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is LogicManager best used for?
- LogicManager is most often used for a mid-sized bank or credit union that needs every department head contributing to risk assessment without paying for a seat each, a risk team replacing a spreadsheet register that cannot show which controls a given vendor failure would affect, an organisation preparing for a regulatory examination that must evidence a linked risk, control and issue trail, a company consolidating separate vendor risk, policy and audit tools onto one taxonomy so findings are not duplicated. Of those, a mid-sized bank or credit union that needs every department head contributing to risk assessment without paying for a seat each and a risk team replacing a spreadsheet register that cannot show which controls a given vendor failure would affect are not what Resolver is typically brought in for.
- What can LogicManager do that Resolver cannot?
- LogicManager covers Risk taxonomy, Unlimited users, Risk assessments, Third-party risk. Resolver covers Investigations, Enterprise risk management, Compliance and obligations, Business continuity. Both handle Internal audit, Incident management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
LogicManager: Is LogicManager really unlimited users?
Yes. It licences on a fixed annual fee covering the organisation rather than per seat, which is the main reason mid-market buyers pick it.
Resolver: Who owns Resolver?
Kroll, which acquired it in 2022. It is marketed as a Kroll business and sold alongside Kroll risk and investigations services.
LogicManager: What does it cost?
Not published. Mid-market ERM platforms of this class typically sit in the low tens of thousands of dollars a year, quoted by scope.
Resolver: What does Resolver cost?
Pricing is not published. It is quoted by module and user count on an annual or multi-year enterprise agreement, with implementation charged separately.
LogicManager: Is it a compliance automation tool like Drata?
No. It is enterprise risk management with audit and vendor risk, not continuous control monitoring for SOC 2 evidence collection.
Resolver: Is Resolver a SOC 2 compliance tool?
No. It is a risk, incident and investigations platform. Automated evidence collection for security certifications is not its strength.
LogicManager: How long does implementation take?
Weeks to a few months, far shorter than the enterprise GRC suites, provided the risk taxonomy is agreed up front.
Resolver: How long does implementation take?
Months rather than weeks for a multi-module deployment, and most customers use vendor or partner services to configure it.
Related pages
More on LogicManager
Other head to heads
- LogicManager vs Diligent
- LogicManager vs MetricStream
- LogicManager vs Drata
- LogicManager vs Silent Eight
- LogicManager vs NICE Actimize
- LogicManager vs Rhombus Systems
- LogicManager vs Trulioo
- LogicManager vs Trend Micro Vision One
- LogicManager vs IBM QRadar
- LogicManager vs Motorola Vigilant
- LogicManager vs VMware Carbon Black
- LogicManager vs Quantexa
- LogicManager vs Termly
- LogicManager vs Transcend
- LogicManager vs WireGuard
- LogicManager vs Akeyless
- LogicManager vs DataGrail
- LogicManager vs Omada Identity
- LogicManager vs Sardine
- LogicManager vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- LogicManager vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- LogicManager vs OneTrust
- LogicManager vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- LogicManager vs ExpressVPN
- LogicManager vs Falco
- LogicManager vs Fenergo
- LogicManager vs Google Authenticator
- LogicManager vs Grype
- Resolver vs Diligent
- Resolver vs MetricStream
- Resolver vs Drata
- Resolver vs Silent Eight
- Resolver vs NICE Actimize
- Resolver vs Rhombus Systems
- Resolver vs Trulioo
- Resolver vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Resolver vs IBM QRadar
- Resolver vs Motorola Vigilant
- Resolver vs VMware Carbon Black
- Resolver vs Quantexa
- Resolver vs Termly
- Resolver vs Transcend
- Resolver vs WireGuard
- Resolver vs Akeyless
- Resolver vs DataGrail
- Resolver vs Omada Identity
- Resolver vs Sardine
- Resolver vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Resolver vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Resolver vs OneTrust
- Resolver vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Resolver vs ExpressVPN
- Resolver vs Falco
- Resolver vs Fenergo
- Resolver vs Google Authenticator
- Resolver vs Grype