Cybersecurity · head to head
Authelia vs Countly

Authelia
Cybersecurity
Open-source authentication and two-factor portal for reverse proxies
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Authelia depends on a reverse proxy: it is not a standalone identity provider; Countly the private cloud plan starts at $175 a month and is described as usage based without stating the unit
- They diverge on capability: Authelia covers Reverse proxy integration, Countly covers Event tracking.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Authelia and Countly actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Authelia
- Reverse proxy integration
- Two-factor authentication
- Access control rules
- Lightweight backends
Only in Countly
- Event tracking
- Crash reporting
- Analytics dashboard
- User retention
- Open-source
- Cloud deployment
- On-premise deployment
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Authelia
- Putting a login and 2FA in front of self-hosted services that have nonenot Countly
- Adding SSO across a small set of internal tools without a full identity platformnot Countly
- Home and small-team infrastructure behind a single reverse proxynot Countly
Countly
- Product analytics for mobile and web applicationsnot Authelia
- Self hosting analytics where data cannot leave the organisationnot Authelia
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Authelia
- Depends on a reverse proxy: it is not a standalone identity provider
- Configuration is YAML-first with no administrative interface, so changes mean editing files
- Not a full IAM: user management, provisioning and federation are limited compared with Keycloak
- Scales poorly as an organisation-wide identity solution, which is not its target
Countly
- The private cloud plan starts at $175 a month and is described as usage based without stating the unit
- No event cap, data point limit or user limit is published for either paid plan
- The self hosted Enterprise edition is custom priced and billed annually
- Adaptivity and intelligence features are separately priced add ons on the cheaper plan
Pricing, plan by plan
Authelia
Free- AutheliaFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Countly
Free- Flex (Private Cloud)$175/month
- Usage-based pricing (not seat-based)
- Advanced Analytics included
- Adaptivity and Intelligence available as add-ons
- Enterprise (Self-Hosted)$null/mo
- Custom pricing, requires demo booking
- All capabilities included
- Deploy on your infrastructure
Which should you pick?
Choose Authelia if
- You need reverse proxy integration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted.
- You also want two-factor authentication.
Choose Countly if
- You need event tracking.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Mobile, Api.
- You also want crash reporting.
Questions people ask
- Is Authelia or Countly better?
- Neither clearly leads. Authelia starts at Free and Countly at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Authelia or Countly?
- Authelia starts at Free and Countly at Free.
- Does Authelia or Countly run on more platforms?
- Authelia runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted. Countly runs on Web, Mobile, Api.
- Can I use Authelia for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Authelia best used for?
- Authelia is most often used for putting a login and 2fa in front of self-hosted services that have none, adding sso across a small set of internal tools without a full identity platform, home and small-team infrastructure behind a single reverse proxy. Of those, putting a login and 2fa in front of self-hosted services that have none and adding sso across a small set of internal tools without a full identity platform are not what Countly is typically brought in for.
- What can Authelia do that Countly cannot?
- Authelia covers Reverse proxy integration, Two-factor authentication, Access control rules, Lightweight backends. Countly covers Event tracking, Crash reporting, Analytics dashboard, User retention.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Authelia: Is Authelia free?
Yes, open source with no licence fee.
Countly: How much does Countly cost?
Countly's Flex plan (private cloud) starts at $175/month with pay-as-you-go cancellation. Enterprise (self-hosted) requires custom pricing and annual billing. Both plans include advanced analytics, and Flex offers a 14-day free trial.
SourceAuthelia: Does Authelia need a reverse proxy?
Yes. It integrates through forward authentication with Nginx, Traefik, Caddy or HAProxy rather than sitting in front of traffic itself.
Countly: What is the difference between Countly Flex and Enterprise plans?
Flex uses usage-based pricing on Countly's cloud with monthly billing. Enterprise requires custom pricing and annual billing, but allows self-hosting on your infrastructure with zero vendor access to data, dedicated support, and included SLA.
SourceAuthelia: Authelia or Keycloak?
Authelia is far lighter and aimed at protecting self-hosted services behind a proxy. Keycloak is a full identity and access management platform, and much more to run.
Countly: Can I add Adaptivity and Intelligence to Countly Flex?
Yes, Adaptivity and Intelligence suites can be added to Flex as needed. Both are included standard with Enterprise plans.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Authelia vs authentik
- Authelia vs Logto
- Authelia vs Ory Kratos
- Authelia vs Frontegg
- Authelia vs Infisical
- Authelia vs Bitwarden
- Authelia vs Semgrep
- Authelia vs Trivy
- Authelia vs Chainguard
- Authelia vs Passbolt
- Authelia vs 1Password
- Authelia vs Signicat
- Authelia vs Silent Eight
- Authelia vs Socket
- Authelia vs Socure
- Authelia vs SonicWall
- Authelia vs Sophos Intercept X
- Authelia vs Ory
- Authelia vs Crazy Egg
- Authelia vs Ruler Analytics
- Authelia vs VWO
- Authelia vs Northbeam
- Authelia vs Umami
- Authelia vs Matomo
- Authelia vs Mautic
- Authelia vs June
- Authelia vs CleverTap
- Authelia vs Moz
- Authelia vs Microsoft Clarity
- Authelia vs Netcore Cloud
- Authelia vs Whatagraph
- Authelia vs MoEngage
- Authelia vs Optimizely
- Authelia vs Vimeo
- Authelia vs Attribution
- Authelia vs Fathom Analytics
- Countly vs authentik
- Countly vs Logto
- Countly vs Ory Kratos
- Countly vs Frontegg
- Countly vs Infisical
- Countly vs Bitwarden
- Countly vs Semgrep
- Countly vs Trivy
- Countly vs Chainguard
- Countly vs Passbolt
- Countly vs 1Password
- Countly vs Signicat
- Countly vs Silent Eight
- Countly vs Socket
- Countly vs Socure
- Countly vs SonicWall
- Countly vs Sophos Intercept X
- Countly vs Ory
- Countly vs Crazy Egg
- Countly vs Ruler Analytics
- Countly vs VWO
- Countly vs Northbeam
- Countly vs Umami
- Countly vs Matomo
- Countly vs Mautic
- Countly vs June
- Countly vs CleverTap
- Countly vs Moz
- Countly vs Microsoft Clarity
- Countly vs Netcore Cloud
- Countly vs Whatagraph
- Countly vs MoEngage
- Countly vs Optimizely
- Countly vs Vimeo
- Countly vs Attribution
- Countly vs Fathom Analytics

